[nuffsenuff]

Anyone else wondering why this story is getting any traction whereas "The Memo" isn't?

One story is about Saddam Hussein failing at an attempted delay tactic. The other is about potentially treasonous activity.

Which one is more important?

I hate liberals.

[cdrw]

you beat me to it - my sentiments exactly.

[eureka!]

what you said

[cyncooper]

Anyone else wondering why this story is getting any traction whereas "The Memo" isn't?

I'm not wondering why, but I've certainly noticed.

Sadly, I know all too well why.

[cyncooper]

Defend the dems is the tack being taken.

MSNBC is (finally? I don't think I've heard them discuss it much until this morning) talking about the memo. I heard it this morning with 3 pundits and the predictable "everybody's partisan" spin from the female "journalist" from Michigan.

Just now they teased that topic coming up and the new brunette female hostess (I forget her name) said "Hear how the democrats say they've been locked out" of discussing their concerns.

So there you go. The Republicans just aren't fair and when the dems are concerned, why the ends justify the means.

OK, topic discussion kicking off now.

(MSNBC "Question of the day" is "Is good economic news bad for democrats?". Everything is always framed as how the poor dems are affected)

Ah, first dem pundit up says the Republicans have reached an all time low in this memo matter. They have become garbage pickers or hacking into computers that don't belong to them.

So, the dem spin is given out as if it were established fact. He just said the Republicans are the unethical ones and dealing with them is like "Rape date" (evidently he meant "date rape").

[PogySailor]

Not me. My local fish wrap was all over this story the past two days. But I've YET to find mention of "The Memo".