To: runningbear
So is his defense is, I had lots of girlfriends? LOL. Keep digging Scott.
It's so obvious he had an incentive to do with away with the ball and chain. He'll be convicted.
5 posted on
11/06/2003 5:34:57 AM PST by
veronica
("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
To: veronica
I loved the words:"Bed Hopper"......;o)
8 posted on
11/06/2003 5:39:40 AM PST by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
To: veronica
I believe his exact words were "When the cat's out of the way, this dog will put himself in play."
9 posted on
11/06/2003 5:44:20 AM PST by
at bay
(no deals, Snotty, only nee-deals)
To: veronica
The legal counter-punch would try to prove Peterson had no reason to kill for Frey, a 28-year-old massage therapist, because he was happy just running around behind Laci's back, according to defense sources and others familiar with their strategy. I believe it was the baby that interfered with his "sexual problem" (serial adultery). That was what was different. He didn't want to be a father, didn't want to be "tied down". Having a wife didn't stop him, but having a wife and baby making more and more demands on his time and attention would have been a serious aggravation to his social life.
11 posted on
11/06/2003 5:50:15 AM PST by
wimpycat
To: veronica
I have always thought that the best way for a husband to defend himself against charges he killed his wife is the "I had lots of girlfriends so I did not need to kill my wife." That shows a depth of character which should immediately lead to a not guilty verdict. I am sure the jury will be as impressed as I am at this logic.
37 posted on
11/06/2003 9:07:46 AM PST by
babaloo
To: veronica
I believe that Scott is a sex addict. Addicts will do just about ANYTHING to get their fix....including murder. How many crackheads have killed in order to get money or more drugs? Scott killed his wife because she got in the way of him scoring more women to have sex with. I hope he rots in hell.
57 posted on
11/06/2003 9:25:32 AM PST by
Ragirl
To: veronica
It's so obvious he had an incentive to do with away with the ball and chain
Yeah, he thought it would be cheaper to kill her and the baby than pay child support for 18 years...not to mention all those weekends he would have to "waste" on the child.
What a piece of s....
65 posted on
11/06/2003 9:58:11 AM PST by
Taffini
(I like Tony Soprano even though he is a fat boy.)
To: veronica
good point veronica. A WORLD full of women, not just Amber huh? Keep digging is right. This sex addict stuff just hurt them some more. The prospective Jury is gonna HATE this guy if this keeps up.
68 posted on
11/06/2003 10:01:53 AM PST by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson