Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTT TRYST TWIST
The NY Post ^ | Nov 6, 2003

Posted on 11/06/2003 5:29:25 AM PST by runningbear

SCOTT TRYST TWIST


BED HOPPER: Scott Peterson, in court recently, "has a need" for adultery, a relative says. - Pool photo

SCOTT TRYST TWIST

By HOWARD BREUER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 6, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Scott Peterson might have had up to six extramarital flings, and defense lawyers will use his alleged bed-hopping to debunk claims he killed his wife to be with gal pal Amber Frey, sources told The Post.

The legal counter-punch would try to prove Peterson had no reason to kill for Frey, a 28-year-old massage therapist, because he was happy just running around behind Laci's back, according to defense sources and others familiar with their strategy.

Authorities have theorized that Peterson, a Modesto fertilizer salesman, murdered Laci and their unborn son, Connor, so he could clear the way to take up with Frey.

But if prosecutors push that theory, Peterson's defense is ready to admit the Frey affair was merely one of many.

The Fox News Channel yesterday quoted a family relative, who said Scott Peterson had at least three affairs.

"He has a sexual problem and has a need to sleep with other women," the relative told Fox.

Lead defense lawyer Mark Geragos was not available for comment yesterday. A DA spokesman conceded that the new allegations could be a wild card at Peterson's trial.

"It's hard to say which way that would land," said John Goold, chief deputy DA. "Both sides could have different arguments on the issue."

The series of affairs, if ever used as evidence, would surely be a slippery slope for one side or another, said Fox News Channel legal editor Stan Goldman.

"The prosecution should probably not put all its eggs in that basket, that Amber Frey was the sole motive for killing his wife," said Goldman, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. "If it turns out that he had many other girlfriends, then Amber Frey becomes less and less important."

"But on the other hand, the prosecution could still argue that it wasn't one woman that was the motive to kill his wife, but rather that it was a world of women," Goldman added.

Pregnant Laci, 27, vanished on Christmas Eve while Scott, 31, allegedly went on a solo fishing trip in San Francisco Bay.

The remains of her and Connor washed ashore in April near San Francisco, leading to Peterson's arrest days later.

Yesterday was supposed to be the sixth day of testimony in Scott Peterson's ........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mops Used In Laci Murder Clean-Up?

Mops Used In Laci Murder Clean-Up?

Nov 5, 2003 8:34 am US/Central

MODESTO, Calif. (CBS) A police officer said Tuesday that he saw a bucket and mops in plain sight in front of Scott Peterson's home as officers began investigating his pregnant wife's disappearance.

The defense testimony is considered a counterpoint to a possible prosecution argument that Peterson mopped the kitchen after killing Laci Peterson on the night of Dec. 23.

Evers said there was no smell of bleach or other cleaning agents in the house, reports CBS News Correspondent Manuel Gallegus.

Other officers have reported detecting the scent of bleach in the kitchen.

Evers testified on the fifth day of a hearing to determine if Peterson, a former fertilizer salesman, will stand trial on two counts of murder for the death of his wife and unborn son.

Peterson, 31, told police he last saw his wife the morning before Christmas as he left to go fishing near Berkeley. He told them he returned to their Modesto home late that afternoon, shortly before family members reported Laci Peterson missing.

The bodies of 27-year-old Laci Peterson and her unborn son washed ashore along the San Francisco Bay in April, about three miles from where her husband said he was fishing.

Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Peterson.

On Friday, the couple's housekeeper, Margarita Nava, testified that she mopped the kitchen floor Dec. 23 with water and Pine-Sol. She said she put the mop outside to dry but put the bucket on top of the washing machine with rags that needed to be laundered.

On Monday, Scott Peterson's defense attorneys challenged the type of DNA analysis done on a hair found in his boat, saying the technique is too unreliable to be used in court.

Prosecutors believe the hair, found in a pair of pliers in the boat, could be from Peterson's wife, Laci. An FBI crime lab supervisor testified during the preliminary hearing last week that mitochondrial DNA from the hair matched a gene swab taken earlier this year from Laci Peterson's mother, Sharon Rocha.

Defense witness William Shields, a biology professor from the State University of New York at Syracuse, testified Monday that while mitochondrial DNA testing can be useful, it is not as precise as other types of DNA testing.

Mitochondrial DNA cannot specifically identify an individual, but if compared with samples taken from a family member, it can show the statistical likelihood that a hair or other tissue came from a certain person.

Peterson is charged with murder in the deaths of his 27-year-old wife and the baby boy she was carrying. The preliminary hearing is to determine if he will stand trial.

There is no evidence Laci Peterson was ever in the boat before her death, and prosecutors are expected to show that she did not even know about the vessel.

Mitochondrial DNA — a molecule that is much smaller than the more familiar nuclear DNA that is used to reveal a person's genetic makeup — helped identify victims of the World Trade Center attack. It can be extracted from hair and bones when little else remains of a body.........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scott Peterson quickly came under suspicion, detective testifies

Posted on Tue, Nov. 04, 2003

Scott Peterson quickly came under suspicion, detective testifies

BY JULIA PRODIS SULEK

Knight Ridder Newspapers

MODESTO, Calif. - (KRT) - Police became suspicious of Scott Peterson within hours after his wife was reported missing, first when he seemed to trip up on his alibi, then when he smoothed out a small rug that was scrunched up against the back door, a detective testified Tuesday.

While the prosecution is counting on Peterson's initial statements and actions to bolster its case, the defense is expected to use the police's reaction to further its own contention - that police became so focused on Peterson from the start that they neglected to adequately pursue any other leads in the murder of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son.

The defense also pointed out Tuesday that when Detective Jon Evers filed his police report he wrote that there was "nothing out of the ordinary to indicate a struggle or violence had occurred" at the Peterson home. Evers also acknowledged under cross examination that he did not smell any cleaning products when he entered the home - potentially undermining a police theory that Peterson mopped up evidence that day.

Two more detectives plan to take the stand this morning in the sixth day of Peterson's preliminary hearing, which will determine whether the 31-year-old fertilizer salesman will stand trial on two first-degree murder charges. Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant, was reported missing Christmas Eve. Her body and the body of their unborn sun washed up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay in April.

One of the star witnesses against Peterson - his former mistress Amber Frey - also could testify as early as Wednesday afternoon. The 28-year-old massage therapist from Fresno could shed light on the only motive suggested so far - that Peterson's feelings for her were so strong that he killed his pregnant wife to be with her.

Tuesday's testimony in Stanislaus County court again focused on Peterson's behavior during his first contact with police.

Evers said Peterson had told him he had spent that day fishing in the San Francisco Bay and came home to find his wife gone and the leash still on the dog in the yard. As he walked through the house with Peterson and a fellow officer, the other officer asked Peterson what he had been fishing for that day. Evers didn't hear Peterson's answer, but Evers said that the fellow officer took him aside a moment later and whispered, "Scott didn't know what he was fishing for."

Evers also said he noticed a throw rug "scrunched" up against the back door jamb, and asked Peterson, "Is that always like that?"

"He said, `Oh, no, the cat and the dog must have been playing,'" Evers testified.

With the toe of his shoe, Peterson then pulled the rug away from the door, Evers said. Although the significance of the rug wasn't mentioned, those in the courtroom were left to wonder whether something heavy, such as a body, had been dragged across it.

But Peterson's defense lawyer, Kirk McAllister, asked Evers why he never mentioned the rug in his police report.

"I was in a hurry when I prepared that," he said, adding that he told detectives about it the next day.

McAllister continued to downplay the significance of the rug when he asked Evers, "Was there a lump under it, like some weapon?"

"I didn't see anything," Evers replied.

"It was a flat rug, right?"

"Yes," Evers said.

McAllister also tried to contradict the police theory that Peterson mopped up his crime scene. Evers testified that he noticed a wet mop and bucket along the walkway near the front door, but he conceded he noticed no wet floors when he went through the house after 5 p.m. Christmas Eve. And contrary to previous reports that police smelled bleach in the house, Evers told McAllister he didn't smell any.

"You smelled no odor of any kind - chlorine, bleach or any other cleaning agent?" McAllister asked.

"That's correct," Evers replied.

Detectives who are scheduled to take the stand Wednesday will likely be asked whether they smelled bleach, either on that first night or in the next couple of days while Peterson was still living in the modest ranch-style house.

Acting on their suspicions, police asked Peterson that night to take them to his office, which was attached to a warehouse storage unit where he kept his fishing boat - a 14-foot aluminum Gamefisher that was reportedly purchased just two weeks before Laci vanished...........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday Proceeding Cancelled In Peterson Case

Wednesday Proceeding Cancelled In Peterson Case

POSTED: 11:25 AM PST November 5, 2003
UPDATED: 11:41 AM PST November 5, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. -- Proceedings in the Scott Peterson preliminary hearing were delayed Wednesday after lead defense attorney Mark Geragos was forced to stay in Los Angeles to deal with a hung jury in another murder case.

Geragos was absent from the proceedings on Tuesday, but was expected to be back in Modesto on Wednesday morning. When the court was told he had been delayed, the proceedings were pushed back to 2:30 p.m. in the hopes that Geragos could make it back. But when Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami was told Geragos could not make it back at all, he called off the proceedings.

Court will be back in session at 9:30 a.m. PST on Thursday.

On Tuesday, with defense attorney Kurt McAllister taking the lead, Modesto police officer Jon Evers testified about what he saw when he arrived at the Peterson home on Christmas Eve.

He said he noticed a mop bucket and two mops in front of Scott and Laci Peterson's home. The officer said the mops were in plain view as he entered the modest single-story green-shingled house on Covena Avenue.

Evers also said he never smelled bleach or any other cleaning agent inside the house.

Video

Ted Rowlands Reports On Tuesday's Hearing

The testimony is considered a counterpoint to a possible prosecution argument that Peterson, 31, cleaned and mopped the kitchen after killing his wife on the night of Dec. 23.

On Friday, the couple's housekeeper, Margarita Nava, testified that she mopped the kitchen floor Dec. 23 with water and Pine-Sol. She said she put the mop outside to dry but put the bucket on top of the washing machine with rags that needed to be laundered.

Other officers have reported detecting the scent of bleach in the kitchen. The mop bucket was seized for evidence, Evers said.

Evers testified on the fifth day of a hearing to determine if Peterson will stand trial on two counts of murder for the death of his wife and unborn son.

While Evers' report noted that there was no evidence of a break-in or sign of a struggle in the house, he did notice that a rug by the breezeway was "scrunched" up against the door jamb. He asked Peterson about it.

"I pointed out that it was the first time I noticed the rug scrunched up against the door," Evers said. "I asked him, 'Is that always like that?"'

"He said, 'Oh no, the cat and dog must have been playing,"' Evers said.................

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Superior Court, Stanislaus County November 5, 2003

Minute Order: Preliminary Hearing

(ie; Sixth day court provided overview)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson lawyer quizzes detective


Laci Peterson was reported missing December 24; her husband, Scott, has pleaded innocent to charges of killing her and their unborn son.

Peterson lawyer quizzes detective

Tuesday, November 4, 2003 Posted: 6:42 PM EST (2342 GMT)

VIDEO

A defense expert says a DNA testing technique used to identify a hair found in Scott Peterson's boat is unreliable.

MODESTO, California (CNN) -- A lawyer for Scott Peterson on Tuesday cross-examined one of the first police officials to interview Peterson after his wife was reported missing.

The cross-examination by defense attorney Kirk McAllister came in an abbreviated session of Peterson's preliminary hearing. Lead defense attorney Mark Geragos was in court in Los Angeles on another case.

Detective Jon Evers interviewed Peterson on December 24 last year, the day Peterson's wife was reported missing by her family.

Evers testified he was told by another law enforcement official that although Peterson said he was fishing in the San Francisco Bay that day, he could not specify the kind of fish he hoped to catch.

Peterson is charged with killing his pregnant wife, Laci, 27, and their unborn son. Their bodies washed up from San Francisco Bay in April.

Peterson, a 31-year-old former fertilizer salesman, has proclaimed his innocence. Prosecutors have said they would seek the death penalty if he is convicted.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441-460 next last
To: Queen Jadis
Ignore my Amy question,I think it was a comment about Rosie in another trial!
161 posted on 11/06/2003 1:56:39 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: MaggieMay
Normally my cable runs Court TV on time delays so I can't watch what East Coasters and such watch. But during high profile cases we go LIVE.

And today they are evidently doing just that. Catherine Crier coming up next, right?

162 posted on 11/06/2003 1:57:59 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Yes,CST gets it live.
163 posted on 11/06/2003 1:58:50 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thankyou!!! I was concerned when no one else affirmed what I heard Beth Karas say.
164 posted on 11/06/2003 1:59:43 PM PST by MaggieMay (A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
If Laci faced a gun and the LE knew it because of "spattuh" that could well explain Sharon's upset this morning. Oh my G-d. My heart breaks anew.

And Devil Anse mentions above that there was a bullet MISSING in the gun. Yikes.

No wonder all the mopping and the bleach. And the draining of the pool. That b@stard must have shot her in the head. And he hangs her beautiful picture up on his wall. I could death penalty him myself.

165 posted on 11/06/2003 2:02:16 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Where is Sandylapper?? When you get here Sandy - SEE, I told you there was gonna be LOTS of incriminating stuff on Snott. There is NOT a CHANCE he didn't Kill Laci & Connor. The Prosecution has just STARTED letting the good stuff out - there is plenty more and WORSE to come. Remember when the Rocha's very suddenly closed the Search Centre forever - THAT's when they knew definitively that Laci was dead!! I hope a LOT of this is a surprise to Geragos. No wonder they are talking planted evidence and sex addict etc. THIS DEFENSE TEAM IS CLIMBING UPHILL WITH SNOT ON THEIR SHOES!!
166 posted on 11/06/2003 2:02:19 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Yes,Gloria Gomez is talking about the jewlery now.
167 posted on 11/06/2003 2:03:30 PM PST by MaggieMay (A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta; Devil_Anse; All
Did you see where it said that MG will ask for charges to be dismissed in reguards to the FBI tapes??
Dev, what's up with that??
168 posted on 11/06/2003 2:03:48 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
On a lighter note before I blow a fuse here, right now I am sure that Robert Blake is on the phone to his attorneys informing them that he had just been playing with an old outboard motor the day of his wife's untimely demise.
169 posted on 11/06/2003 2:03:53 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: MaggieMay; Sandylapper
... and let's see, what else did I learn from you and the others (forgive the repetition):

The FBI had Scott's home under video surveillance, from a neighbor's house. I assume this began after Laci became "missing", perhaps it began on Christmas?

Oh, have to ping Sandylapper, though I'm sure she already knows this: They report that Amber discovered that Scott was married on Dec. 9! Sandy, you were only 2 days off in calculating that!

And Amber confronted him with this, which was when he said he was a "widower".

It looks like that secret warehouse was of a type which is supposed to be for storing boats and RV's; now it really begins to look like that was the one of his warehouses where he kept the boat.

The police found 2 unopened packs of fishing lures in Scott's truck.

Scott called Amber in January and told her he had a gift for her; she made excuses and said she couldn't meet with him, so he arranged to, and did, drop it off in some bushes by Children's Hospital in Fresno. It was jewelry, but no one knows WHICH jewelry.

Det. Brocchini, w/ permission, took down the contents of Scott's cellphone log.

Laci's cell was in her vehicle, and was found to have a msg from Scott on it, in which he said he was on his way back from fishing, and told her he couldn't pick up the gift basket for Amy.

There was also a msg from Scott to Laci on the home phone.
170 posted on 11/06/2003 2:05:43 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Could the case be dismissed on the basis of the video surveillance? WHY? I hope Geragos is just trying to diddle his way into his million and that there is no way the case can be dismissed.

We would all tear our hair out if Scaughty walked free.

171 posted on 11/06/2003 2:06:06 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
If he shot her, and we're trying to figure out where, don't forget he travelled about 90 miles, probably in the dead of night, the night of the 23-24. She could have been unconscious, knocked out, or even asleep, and he could have shot her anywhere along the country roads, perhaps even outside the vehicle. Although if he did that, it is amazing that they didn't find any trace of blood in the truck. Well, he DID later wash out the truck bed with gasoline...
172 posted on 11/06/2003 2:08:37 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Wowee-wow! Already read the fax!!??
173 posted on 11/06/2003 2:08:42 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I just heard that "sources say" that the jewelry was costume jewelry,not Laci's. (CTV)
174 posted on 11/06/2003 2:08:44 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Re widower comment -- IF Scott were innocent, why in heck would he say that? Since he is NOT, I believe, then all he was really saying to Amber is "The check is in the mail."
175 posted on 11/06/2003 2:09:13 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: All; Yaelle; runningbear; Sandylapper; Jackie-O; Canadian Outrage; Velveeta; Devil_Anse; ...
I just got back online so haven't had time to read all the postings. I don't know if this was reported or not, but just heard on radio news one of the first officers found a 22 caliber simi-automatic handgun in Scotts pickup.
176 posted on 11/06/2003 2:09:30 PM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: MaggieMay
I wish I could hear Gloria Gomez. She's on top of this case.
177 posted on 11/06/2003 2:09:32 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Court TV:

Guy reporter just confirmed (in addition to some other details we had established) that the testimony today was that Scott Peterson did ask if they were using cadaver dogs, which the officer (of course) thought was suspicious.

Gal reporter (not Beth K.) now saying how Scott told Amber he was a widow and "this would be his first Christmas without his wife".

Hmmmmmmmm
178 posted on 11/06/2003 2:09:58 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
You are right -- he could have drugged her and shot her anywhere.

Did he REALLY clean out the bed of the truck with GASOLINE? How often does anyone do THAT??

179 posted on 11/06/2003 2:10:48 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
He said he "just found out" about that. He'll claim they violated discovery rules. If the tapes have anything EXCULPATORY on them, he'll claim they violated the Brady case, which says they must disclose exculpatory evidence in their possession to the defense.

I heard that the prosecution said that they did too give him those tapes.
180 posted on 11/06/2003 2:12:11 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441-460 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson