Posted on 11/05/2003 5:32:53 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Edited on 04/12/2004 6:00:53 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
A member of the Board of Supervisors best known for his focus on homelessness and a more liberal colleague were chosen by voters Tuesday to face off next month in what could be an electrifying contest for mayor between two thirty-somethings.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
This is a joke. In San Francisco's ever delightful Mission District, Newsom is consistently portrayed as a corporate blood-sucker cynically using the "homeless" as stepping stones to his place at the trough. I don't recall him yet being adorned with swastikas (as Pres. Bush constantly is) but it won't surprise me if/when it happens. People who don't spend time on the streets of S.F. simply can't imagine how far skewed the politics are here.
"It is not too hard to figure out why San Francisco has so many vagrants. Indigent adults receive cash payments of $320 to $395 a month, with only a nominal work requirement for the able-bodied. Supplemented by a little panhandling, this is a tidy sum in the agreeable North California climate. When I wrote about the situation on this magazines website, I got e-mails from people in neighboring towns and counties saying: Please dont write about this. Were happy with things just as they are. San Francisco takes in all our homeless people, so were spared the problem...
"Naturally this logic is lost on the citys irredeemably liberal Board of Supervisors and their soul-mates in the local press. One of the latter, Ilene Lelchuk of the San Francisco Chronicle, recently began a sentence thus: "With San Francisco's homeless population growing despite the millions of dollars the city spends annually to help its most desperate residents..." Note that word despite. We spend more and more on the homeless, and still their numbers increase. How can this be? What a strange and wonderful thing is the liberal mind! (Recall the similarly clueless New York Times headline: Prison Population Swells Despite Falling Crime Levels.)
"By last year the situation had already got so bad that city voters were presented with a November ballot initiative, Proposition N, under whose terms that $395 monthly cash handout would be reduced to $59, the balance being replaced by city-provided food and shelter. This Care not Cash initiative was passed, with 60 percent of voters in favor. That of course outraged the citys left-wing activists, who immediately challenged the vote in court. On May 8 Superior Court Judge Ronald Quidachay ruled that only the Board of Supervisors can set city welfare policy, and that the ballot initiative was therefore invalid. The hundred-dollars-a-week handouts to anyone that shows up will continue in a city that is looking at a $350m deficit this year
So, the city of San Francsico spends MILLIONS of dollars per year on these worthless bums; How stupid is it to understand that when you hand out free money, the problem is going to get worse because it only attracts more of the same??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.