Skip to comments.
San Francisco Approves Nation's Most Ambitious Minimum Wage Law
ABC28 ^
| 11/5/03
Posted on 11/05/2003 6:15:24 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
San Francisco-AP -- San Francisco is one of the most expensive places to live -- and voters there are trying to make it a little more affordable. They've approved a ballot measure boosting the minimum wage to eight-dollars and 50 cents an hour. That's more than three dollars above the federal minimum wage and will apply to virtually every employer in San Francisco.
The federally required minimum wage of five-15 an hour is far below the federal poverty level.
Yesterday's vote makes San Francisco the third city in the country to set its own higher wage threshold. Backers are hoping the idea spreads to other cities.
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2003; minwage; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I say raise the minimum wage to $20/hr in SF> That will bankrupt that hell hole.
2
posted on
11/05/2003 6:16:26 AM PST
by
nwrep
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If they think SF if expensive to live now---
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why can't these fools realize that when you force wages up, with no rise in production, prices go up just as much?
4
posted on
11/05/2003 6:17:40 AM PST
by
sticker
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
San Francisco is one of the most expensive places to live -- and voters there are trying to make it a little more affordable. They have succeeded, but they may not realize how.
With this minimum wage, and without a minimum purchasing law to insist people support the prices necessary to sustain this wage, jobs will be lost. As the jobs go, the population will decline. Declining population will reduce demand for housing, lowering the prices.
All in all, an effective plan. The danger, of course, is they will raise taxes on the remaining people to replace the lost tax base with the reduced work force. If that happens, the plan will fail.
Dimwit liberals - ya could love 'em if they didn't always have their hands stuck in your pockets.
Shalom.
5
posted on
11/05/2003 6:18:25 AM PST
by
ArGee
(Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What uncompassionate pigs these guys are if they think $8.50/hour is a "living wage" in the Bay Area.
They should raise it to $100/hour.
6
posted on
11/05/2003 6:18:59 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Nice headline. They should try it with pom-poms next time.
7
posted on
11/05/2003 6:20:48 AM PST
by
AngryJawa
("The bang is great, but the shockwave is where it’s at.")
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Lefties just don't seem to be able to understand that everyone's income is somebody else's cost.
8
posted on
11/05/2003 6:21:17 AM PST
by
Maceman
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"A Liberal is someone who watches a 14 year old girl performing a live sex act on stage and wonders if she's being paid a living wage."
Ann Coulter
9
posted on
11/05/2003 6:23:50 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
(I got hemoglobin, you got hemoglobin, all God's children got hemoglobin)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Next they're going to need an ordiance against layoffs because all businesses will be shedding workers like fleas to contain their labor costs, prior to leaving Baghdad-by-the-bay.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hmmm....what economics class did the writer of this article sleep through? :o)
If all business must pay 62% higher prices for a product, they have to raise prices accordingly. That does not make the community where the businesses are located "more afforable".
If businesses must pay 62% higher prices for labor, they have to raise prices accordingly. Neither does this make the community where the bussinesses are located "more afforable".
Sometimes I think Alice In Wonderland's world was more rational than the one politicians and journalists live in.
:o)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm still waiting for an answer. Any kind of an answer.
If this is legal, and a good idea, why didn't they propose a minimum wage of $85 an hour?
12
posted on
11/05/2003 6:27:09 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Beautiful San Francisco, home of the $10.00 Latte..
13
posted on
11/05/2003 6:27:23 AM PST
by
stylin_geek
(Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
To: Publius6961
It's $8.50 because that's what Sante Fé's living wage is.
14
posted on
11/05/2003 6:30:06 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Let them enjoy their $20 cup of coffee...
Suddenly there will be no low skill jobs in San Francisco available... They could get that nice big fat minimum wage if only they could get a job... Amazing...
I'll enjoy watching them self-destruct from a distance...
15
posted on
11/05/2003 6:30:10 AM PST
by
DB
(©)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sounds like San Francisco doesn't want low wage earners in their city. I guess they'll have to go somewhere else.
To: Semper Paratus
Next they're going to need an ordiance against layoffsI believe this is already the case in Germany, with the predictable results, of course.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Next comes price controls after businesses are forced to raise prices to PAY the wage. How long before we hear some Idiotarian complaining that "evil big business" is making people pay more so that the "living wage" isn't helping.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This should do wonders to alleviate the homeless problem. Guess they decided there weren't enough desperate souls sleeping in the doorways and parks of downtown SF. The idiocy of the left is a gift that just keeps on giving.
19
posted on
11/05/2003 6:35:07 AM PST
by
massadvj
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
All those US citizens who washed dishes, worked in dry cleaning, and worked as janitors will now be fired. Their jobs will be replaced by Almost-Legal-Slave Immigrants, who will be paid $1.50/hour.
Teenagers can just forget getting summer employment.
But of course, all the lost jobs will be blamed on Bush.
20
posted on
11/05/2003 6:37:27 AM PST
by
kidd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson