Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/05/2003 3:12:10 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
"It smells of intimidation to me. It sounds to me like they were intimidated," Daschle said Tuesday at a news conference.

"And I'm disappointed. I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

Poor tommy Dashole is deeply disappointed........
whereas if "the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by" INSIDE forces, that would be OK.


"...that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

Warning! Caution! Some statements in the above article may be incomplete as befits a "fictional biographical" sketch.

Thanky you.

2 posted on 11/05/2003 3:22:42 AM PST by tet68 (Patrick Henry ......."Who fears the wrath of cowards?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
It's just so great that leftists have lost their media stranglehold on America. The hysterics are just so much proof of it. It is a good thing. The so called "special interests" that "intimidated" CBS are called customers, Tommy. They are regular Americans who (by the way) own the airwaves, and who are consumers of television, and have every right to have their voice heard, you little twerpy elitist loser. Just wait until the GOP gets a filibuster proof majority! Then you will REALLY be disappointed!
3 posted on 11/05/2003 3:23:04 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Even CNSNews calls Medved a "conservative" critic?! I hope they identify Roger Ebert as a "liberal" critic and others by their political stipes as well.
4 posted on 11/05/2003 3:42:41 AM PST by aardvark1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
If they actually air it on showtime I'm going to drop the service.
6 posted on 11/05/2003 4:02:31 AM PST by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
the Republican Party of turning American "television into [a] Soviet-Style Propaganda Tool."

No dear, that would be what SeeBS was doing.

9 posted on 11/05/2003 4:27:40 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; All
Shelving of 'Reagans' touches off hot debate ***"In pulling the film, CBS did incredible harm, much more harm than they could ever have done in making the film," said Neal Gabler, author of Life the Movie: How Entertainment Conquered Reality. "What they've told us now is that a small group of people have censorship power over the broadcast networks."

What complicates the issue for some is the very nature of docudrama - a debased genre that includes wholesale invention and what Thompson called "pure dish." Networks have become so brazen in ignoring any journalistic or historical concerns of accuracy that some analysts see it as significant that CBS finally admitted there was a line and that The Reagans crossed it.

"I do find it offensive that important points of our national history are totally rewritten in such docudramas to serve entertainment values intended to appeal to the lowest common denominator," said Phil Seib, media historian and Lucius W. Nieman professor of journalism at Marquette University.

"So, you have to legitimately ask yourself whether this could be interpreted as a victory for history and taste. If it is, though, it would be a rare one when it comes to network television and our national past. And it does raise serious concerns that such pressure was mounted and the film was pulled without anyone outside of CBS seeing it."

The controversy started last month when CBS sent a cassette with selected "highlights" from the miniseries to critics. Portions of the script were also selectively leaked. The highlights showed Nancy Reagan portrayed as a modern-day Lady Macbeth, manipulating her husband and scheming backstage to run the White House. Reagan was portrayed as mean-spirited and often befuddled.

The portion of the script that has drawn the most fire involved a portrayal of Reagan as being utterly insensitive to those suffering from AIDS. When Nancy tries to enlist his aid in fighting the emerging epidemic, the script has Reagan replying, "They that live in sin, shall die in sin."

In the highlight reel, Reagan is also shown approving the sale of arms to Iran in 1984 during a moment of dementia when he fails to even recognize the national security aide to whom he is speaking. Brent Baker, vice president of the Media Research Center, yesterday cited that depiction as the kind of questionable history that so troubled his organization. ***

12 posted on 11/05/2003 5:07:06 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4ConservativeJustices; .45MAN; ABG(anybody but Gore); acnielsen guy; aeronca; Angelwood; AnnaZ; ...
"It smells of intimidation to me. It sounds to me like they were intimidated," Daschle said Tuesday at a news conference. "And I'm disappointed. I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

-------------------------------------------------------------

(Please Freepmail me if you want on/off Daschle ping.)

13 posted on 11/05/2003 5:08:03 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
bfl
16 posted on 11/05/2003 5:13:09 AM PST by oyez (blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Someone should make a movie in which a mentaly deficient husband is badgered and ordered around by a dominating, but non the less equally mentally deficient wife, and call it "The Striesands"
19 posted on 11/05/2003 5:18:01 AM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"Leaving aside its content or its political slant, my guess is CBS is deciding to save itself embarrassment"

Are you kidding? If the people at CBS were capable of embarrassment, they'd wear bags over their heads for the rest of their lives!

"'We believe it does not present a balanced portrayal of the Reagans for CBS and its audience,' the Viacom statement read."

Strange that they didn't notice this until after the public outcry...!

ABSURD OBSERVATION OF THE WEEK:

"The original decision to broadcast a factually distorted film about the former president when he is in the latter stages of Alzheimer's disease showed disgustingly poor taste"

BRENT!!! You are talking about THE DEMOCRATS!!!

(F'cryin' out loud!!! Whaddaya expect??? Honesty???)

20 posted on 11/05/2003 5:19:22 AM PST by Savage Beast (The meaning of the California Revolution: The socioeconomic fabric is not indestructable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

BS I happen to know for a fact it was he who pressured the producers of Dallas to bring Bobby back. Leaving the viewers stuck with a years worth of dreams....

21 posted on 11/05/2003 5:20:12 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
How strange that the left is in a tizzy about this show getting the axe. Here is part of a NY Times article that was also printed in the Austin Un-American Liberal Rag today.

"It's clear that CBS has given into the GOP's demands," said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a Washington advocacy group. "It's a very bad precedent, and it sends a message to the creative community that no matter how good your work is, it can easily get axed."

Strange, there wasn't ONE LINE about the RAT memo detailing how to derail the Bush Whitehouse from yesterday..... Not that I would expect to see it in that rag...

24 posted on 11/05/2003 5:23:05 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter are living proof that not all blondes are dumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"CBS' Hitler miniseries also underwent some changes after an early draft of the script leaked and drew fire. That all those changes were aimed at making Hitler look even worse than he appeared in the original just goes to show you Ronald Reagan has a lot more friends," Gray wrote Tuesday.

I haven't had my coffee, so maybe I'm missing something. Is this TV journalist suggesting that only pro-Reagan people would demand that Hitler be shown as a bad guy on TV? I mean, I know Hitler was a socialist ... but I thought even the socialists tried to dissociate theselves from him. In this quote it looks like only Republicans would dislike the guy.

31 posted on 11/05/2003 5:31:02 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The hypocrisy of all this makes me sick. Clearly Daschle and friends have never heard of the liberal onslaught that got Dr. Laura's tv cancelled, nor attempts to have her radio showed cancelled as well. Oh, and there are the constant liberal attacks against Rush, culminating in an almost Palestinian-like victory dance by Ed Asner, Hollywood's most mentally unbalanced liberal, when Rush spoke the truth about Donovan McNabb's less-than-spectacular quarterback abilities- with the threat that Sean Hannity is next. And there really isn't a need to mention the cries of fools like Al Franken and Barbra Streisand, who claim that conservatives are taking over all the media.
36 posted on 11/05/2003 5:42:18 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
And I'm disappointed

Listen Tom, you need to drop this as your middle name and make it your last name.

42 posted on 11/05/2003 6:35:41 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"It smells of intimidation to me. It sounds to me like they were intimidated," Daschle said Tuesday at a news conference. "And I'm disappointed. I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

I'm sure Daschle et al echoed similar sentiments when the "outside forces" went after Dr. Laura and Michael Savage.

NOT.

45 posted on 11/05/2003 6:42:29 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Who are the members of the dirty little group that thought this project up and saw it through to compleasion?

Where are they hiding now?

Notice how we are not hearing about them in these articles.

46 posted on 11/05/2003 6:44:32 AM PST by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I like that, we are being called a "Special Interest Group"
The commie libs fail to see the big picture, this was Middle America exercising our right to free speech by using the only thing these morons understand, OUR ECONOMIC CLOUT!!
Get used to it libs your stranglehold on the media is loosening faster than you can scream "Vast Right Wing Conpiracy". By the way we are a Special Interest Group, we are 'specially interested in keeping our Constitutional Republic out of your power hungry commie little hands.
54 posted on 11/05/2003 8:59:11 AM PST by sean327 (Gun control=Good sight picture, and good sight alignment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Cancelled Reagan Miniseries Was 'a Stinker,' Says Critic

How could it NOT be a stinker: it has the stench of Barbra Streisand all over it!

55 posted on 11/05/2003 9:17:24 AM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"...it does again raise the specter of just how powerful some of these special interest groups truly are today," Daschle added."

Individual citizens, banding together to boycott those promoting filth about an individual we admire, are now considered a "special interest group."

Whatever...MUD

66 posted on 11/05/2003 5:59:03 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson