Skip to comments.
The largest gathering of self-indulged, complete cowardice I have ever seen.
Fark.com ^
| today
| none
Posted on 11/04/2003 7:45:05 PM PST by Michael Barnes
This thread has to be by far the largest nesting of complete wimps I have yet to uncover.
I know Fark has a right leaning tendancy, but you should hear all the brave souls on this thread getting ready to hop ship.
Quite honestly, I hope they do, I would shudder to think that even half of them would serve in my beloved Armed Service.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: commie; ohcanada; wimp; yellow
shaking head...
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: unix
Just remember. Leftist online usually are several degrees outside of reality. As such when what they say filters out to the real world it just alienates the average joe even further.
3
posted on
11/04/2003 7:51:34 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
arghhh...yup, it's right there as well....
4
posted on
11/04/2003 7:51:34 PM PST
by
Michael Barnes
(Al Gore's Invention is killing the Democratic Party)
To: unix
Well, to the extent they oppose the draft, this veteran agrees with them.
While I would support limiting the right to vote to those who serve in the military, I would not reinstitute the draft. A society whose young men and women are unwilling to defend it does not deserve to survive.
5
posted on
11/04/2003 7:53:19 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: CatoRenasci
I don't support the draft purely because I don't wnat people like "them" in our Military. I have faith that enough would join up..
6
posted on
11/04/2003 7:56:31 PM PST
by
Michael Barnes
(Al Gore's Invention is killing the Democratic Party)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Sad.
7
posted on
11/04/2003 7:56:54 PM PST
by
lainie
To: lainie
very sad indeed...
8
posted on
11/04/2003 8:01:11 PM PST
by
Michael Barnes
(Al Gore's Invention is killing the Democratic Party)
To: unix
Perhaps you misunderstand.
The gang at Fark are not objecting to fighting for their country (a significant percentage are hardcore RKBA types), they're objecting to the idea of conscription.
I don't blame 'em. Ask me to defend my country, and I'll show up gung-ho providing my own significant firepower and training. Force me to fight and the fight won't be with who you tell me to.
It's the draft argument again.
9
posted on
11/04/2003 8:06:01 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
To: ctdonath2
No, I think I understand perfectly..
There is a very large amount in this country that want's all the country can give, but want to give nothing in return. Like you, I would drop what I am doing and go to help out the country at the drop of a hat. Even after serving 4 years.
10
posted on
11/04/2003 8:21:17 PM PST
by
Michael Barnes
(Al Gore's Invention is killing the Democratic Party)
To: ctdonath2
It's FARK. That's how almost all the threads go.
It's an Internet tabloid featuring strange stories, odd headlines and, sometimes, amusing discussion. Don't look to it for anything resembling intelligent debate (on most issues).
-D.
11
posted on
11/04/2003 8:35:35 PM PST
by
dionyza
To: unix
What these jagoffs don't realize (thanks in large part to a Leftist-biased media) is that the
registration for the draft was reinstated six years after the conclusion of the Vietnam conflict by none other than President Jimmy Carter.
Naturally, nobody in the media speaks ill of Carter or mentions this inconvenient little fact because he's a Democrat.
12
posted on
11/04/2003 9:06:28 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I want to be immortal. Then I'll never have to vote Democrat.)
To: unix
What a bunch of whinie babies, and there is no way that a draft will be necassary.
A draft would be a huge mistake, but if the Dem's get any kind of majority, expect it to be done.
They would like nothing more then to turn Iraq into the quagmire they claim it is, and starting up a draft would do exactly that, turn Iraq into a political football for them to kick around, as if they aren't doing that now, the scumbags.
13
posted on
11/04/2003 9:12:04 PM PST
by
Ogmios
(Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson