Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Intel Committee Memo Reveals Anti-Bush Plot
NewsMax ^ | 11/4/03 | Limbacher

Posted on 11/04/2003 1:56:35 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Edited on 11/04/2003 2:47:08 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: Sgt_Schultze
Well, that mystified me as well but I don't think this is the full memo. It's bad enough they've been found out using committee resources, with RINO Republicans assistance, to dig for dirt. If there're indications they plan on using classified info for that purpose they're toast, as in jail time.
21 posted on 11/04/2003 2:28:28 PM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
Sean Hannity has a scoop on dem party corruption (Vanity)

Here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1014660/posts

22 posted on 11/04/2003 2:34:21 PM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
One must understand the mind of the Democratic citizen.

I can't explain why people seem to be this way, I just have learned over time that they are.

None of the media, and most of the population that either consider themselves democrats or don't particularly consider themselves Republicans, will see this and BELIEVE IT IS A REPUBLICAN PARTY PLOT TO EMBARRASS THE DEMS.

It wouldn't matter if every member of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee stood up and admitted it was true.

23 posted on 11/04/2003 2:35:05 PM PST by UCANSEE2 ("Duty is ours, Results are God's" --John Quincy Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
to copy the links to other threads

To post a link, type
<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1014660/posts"> Sean Hannity has a scoop on dem party corruption (Vanity)</a>

and it will be read as
Sean Hannity has a scoop on dem party corruption (Vanity)

24 posted on 11/04/2003 2:37:35 PM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
Without a written copy it could be denied as groundless political posturing by the Republican party.

An 'excellence in posting' BUMP.

25 posted on 11/04/2003 2:40:14 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent bump

 

hillary talks: ON CHINA

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com
 


26 posted on 11/04/2003 2:48:27 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
exactly bump!
27 posted on 11/04/2003 2:50:20 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
"I can't explain why people seem to be this way, I just have learned over time that they are."

For a person to maintain a liberal mindset beyond the age of 21 indicates the prescence of a mental disorder.

Liberalism is a mental disorder that can be treated (with heavy doses of reality) in its early stages, but becomes more difficult to cure as the person ages.

28 posted on 11/04/2003 3:04:30 PM PST by semaj ("....by their fruit you will know them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Scumbags, but this is no surprise, nor will it amount to anything but further loses for the RATS.
29 posted on 11/04/2003 3:06:36 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
My gosh, if I didn't know better, I'd say the memo was written by Dave Screwtape
30 posted on 11/04/2003 3:07:35 PM PST by Keyes2000mt (Pray for Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: All
If you follow the links within the link here:

Ignorance Making You Ill? Cure It!

...you find a lot of contact info, including, but not limited to, your "critters" in DC.

Don't let the SOB's get away with this putrid outrage.

32 posted on 11/04/2003 3:16:14 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
In a time of war this is nothing less than sedition and may even be treason.
33 posted on 11/04/2003 3:19:09 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Milquetoast Q. Whitebread is alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Dem Intel Committee"....

There is no such thing as an intelligent DnC type.
34 posted on 11/04/2003 3:21:19 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And next from the demorats: Republicans cause cancer.
35 posted on 11/04/2003 3:24:26 PM PST by Beck_isright (Socialists are like cockroaches. No matter how many die, 300 more are born under every cowpile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
...Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war...

Tough case to make when the Iraq War Resolution passed in the Senate 77-23 and the House by 296-133 including many democrats.

36 posted on 11/04/2003 3:24:47 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
The news here is that the Dems are now on record as conducting partisan witch hunts. That's the importance of the memo.

Bump.

That's significant enough, but if the source of this memo can document the willingness of Intelligence Committee Democrats to use classified material, or to declassify material for use in partisan attacks, we may be looking at criminal charges.

37 posted on 11/04/2003 3:27:52 PM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Which might make them more inclined to use declassified info to explain their flip-flop. Does the Senate get to declassify its own intell product? Or do they have to go through the executive branch for authorization? Because if the answer's the former, then how do we know that info that should've/would've remained classified hasn't been declassified just to help the Dems sell-out their country for political gain?
38 posted on 11/04/2003 3:29:15 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
What is shows is that the Democrats are only interested in using the intelligence committee for political purposes, not to advance national security.
39 posted on 11/04/2003 3:30:20 PM PST by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: em2vn
The DemocRATs misjudge the public on this. I guess they think that since THEY are all illiterate, then everyone else must be.
40 posted on 11/04/2003 3:34:20 PM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson