Posted on 11/04/2003 1:56:35 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Edited on 11/04/2003 2:47:08 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
A memo circulated among Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence shows the committee's minority plotting to use classified information against the White House in next year's presidential campaign.
The document, obtained and disclosed by nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity Tuesday afternoon, suggests that the top priority among senior Democrats entrusted with guarding the nation's security is instead driving the Bush administration from power based on claims it exaggerated intelligence on the threat posed by Iraq.
The memo as reported by Hannity reads as follows:
"We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:
"1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard.
"For example, in addition to the President's State of the Union speech, the chairman [Sen. Pat Roberts] has agreed to look at the activities of the office of the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department.
"The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and cosigns our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. [We can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.]
"2) Assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it.
"In that regard we may have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims. We will contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry.
"The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an Independent Commission [i.e., the Corzine Amendment.]
"3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation of the administration's use of intelligence at any time. But we can only do so once.
"The best time to do so will probably be next year, either:
"A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report, thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public. Additional views on the interim report (1). The announcement of our independent investigation (2). And (3) additional views on the final investigation. Or:
"B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue, we would attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the use of intelligence.
"In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter footdragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman. We have independently submitted written requests to the DOD and we are preparing further independent requests for information.
"SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war.
"The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives." [End of Memo Excerpt.]
The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.
That's the whole "beauty" of it (from the 'Rat perspective). They only have to threaten to do so, or advocate investigations that might do so. They will depend on the administration to protect the security of intelligence information, but in doing so they (the administration) can be made to appear to be "hiding something" or "obstructing justice".
The best and most effective 'Rat strategies are those based on the assumption their opponents will behave honorably and responsibly. Our best strategies are based on the opposite assumption.
Exactly. Whatever "intelligence" that Hillary is hoping to mangle for the 2004 election needs to be repeated over and over again. And? We need repeat the talking points from Hillary's foray into Senate Intelligence Committee espionage ourselves .
Nothing works like the Clintonian "old news" spin, you know. By the time the election rolls around, they'll have shot their entire wad (with a little help from our side).
I guess if we had to investigate this war throughly, we'd better to go back to Clinton bombing Iraq for it's WMD's as well. After all, that's why he attacked, too. Right? The Clinton administration told us about Saddams WMD's for 8 long years. Where did he get his information to brief Bush?
Thanks for the link ! Gettin' late for me, so I'll be shutting down this machine.bttt for the morning to catch up to this BIG news ...
Exactly. The Democrats are the party of death. (Of course, dead people make up a bunch of their voting base, so I suppose for them, that's logical.)
A draft of what? If this was the early version, what did the final version look like? I won't believe that it looked nothing like the draft.
-PJ
Politics is neither polite nor honest. It is a shame that the idea of the citizen taking the time to serve in public office will never again be possible. We have nothing but a corrupt political class that just keeps on helping themselves. Until the voters decide enough is enough it will never stop...and the Democrats have always been better at paying for the privilege to steal...Republicans are usually too afraid of the consequence.
So, now this. It looks like they were playing the Chairman for a chump all along. And, it also looks like Roberts is more interested in maintaining his fantasy of bi-partisanship on the Intelligence committee than in believing what his own eyes are telling him.
-PJ
I'll bet they spent this whole night on the phone to each other. Rove must be totally P.O'd! My guess is they're working on the check mate right now.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.