"Not that theyre always wrong. The ACLU is now helping to overturn a Mississippi state law that prohibits homosexual couples in that state from adopting children...."
I could very well be wrong, but I don't think gays should be adopting children. What kind of home environment would that be to grow up in?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Carbonsteel
Oh.... I think it would be gay! < /gag>
2 posted on
11/02/2003 12:50:08 AM PST by
clee1
(Where's the beef???)
To: Carbonsteel
The ACLU lately has gone so far left I almost find it embarassing to agree with them on anything. To be sure, like a broken clock they're right occasionally, but they've become so overtly leftist it's frightening.
3 posted on
11/02/2003 12:51:34 AM PST by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: Carbonsteel; Stingray51
The ACLU has now degenerated to the point where they?ll fight against your right to erect a Nativity Scene but they?ll fight for the right of the local freak who stumbles into the scene and fondles one of the sheep. ROFLMAO
4 posted on
11/02/2003 12:52:20 AM PST by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Carbonsteel
What kind of home environment would that be to grow up in?Probably very normal, for the most part. I think gay people are capable of acting like normal parents, just as much as straight people are. BUT when a kid grows up without a mother or without a father, that has to have some sort of cost attached to it. Even if a gay couple puts in a perfect effort at raising kids, I doubt the kids would be as well off as if they had come from a normal, two-parents-of-opposite-sex home.
5 posted on
11/02/2003 12:52:29 AM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: Carbonsteel
"
The American Civil Liberties Union is imploding and the wide array of life options it endorses seems to no longer include a belief in the traditional American way."Well, welcome to the party, Dennis!
However, it's just wishful thinking that the ACLU (sometimes known as the "Anti-Christian Litigation Union) is imploding. Their founder, a certain Roger Baldwin, if I'm not mistaken, was anti-constitution and called it a "living" document, subject to change.
The ACLU is and always has been a subversive organization.
To: Carbonsteel
You missed a couple of other pots the ACLU has their fingers in.
They are supporting Michael Schiavo and Felos the Fraud in putting Terri to death.
They are filing suit on the east coast to ban the ban on partial birth abortion - the President hasn't even signed it into law yet. Planned Parenthood is filing on the west coast and some Reproductive Rights group in the midwest.
These people are all CRAZY. Does anyone remember the old Sci-Fi movie "Invaders from Mars"?
People were taken aboard a spaceship that landed "under" the desert (they fell through the sand and down into the ship) wherein the aliens put some chip in the back of the neck. This caused them to do whatever the head alien wanted, including murder.
Sound familiar?
To: Carbonsteel
I can hardly wait until Dennis has a show. He's going to shake things up with his brilliant mind and witty insight rather than anger or pompous self righteousness.
10 posted on
11/02/2003 3:38:08 AM PST by
tkathy
(The islamofascists and the democrats are trying to destroy this country)
To: Carbonsteel
"ACLU hasn't A-C-L-U-E"
I like that.
To: Carbonsteel
THE ACLU began as a convicts dream to get revenge against
America. Baldwin was a devotee to Soviet Communism--said
commuist opppression was to advance the State--while ours
was just oppressive.Most of the leaders prior to the 60's
played revolving seats with the CPUSA.And in the sixties
Hoover said the bulk of their cases were in defence of
Commuinsists that had run afoul of the law.In 1989 the ACLU
successfully convinced our errant Court to accept desecration of Our Flag as protected speech a Communist
(Johnson)was behind that.Clearly a record of deception and
anti-American activitiy cannot be trumped by a few crumbs
tossed to appease the useful idiots.
To: Carbonsteel
The ACLU has now degenerated to the point where theyll fight against your right to erect a Nativity Scene but theyll fight for the right of the local freak who stumbles into the scene and fondles one of the sheep.ROTFLMAO! This is exactly what the Get A-C-L-U-E crowd is about.
To: Carbonsteel
I caught a bit of Walter Williams sitting in for Rush this week. He had an interview with a law professor who has a book out on the ACLU. The author's main point was that the ACLU was created ostensibly to protect civil liberties, i.e., to protect individual rights from government oppression. Instead, it supports using the federal government to oppress individual choices such as who we associate with, what we say, what we do, how we worship. I thought it was a very insightful analysis.
Anyone recall the name of the book or the author?
18 posted on
11/02/2003 6:25:42 AM PST by
TN4Liberty
(If I had anything interesting to say, I would say it in the post.)
To: Carbonsteel
Right now, the ACLU is trying to stop KY Republican pollwatchers from monitoring any signs of voter fraud on this Tuesday's Governor's race. ACLU lawyers are claiming that Republican pollwathcers suppress black voter turnout. What a pile of trash! The ACLU is a subsidiary of the RAT party. The ACLU's misssion is to enable DemocRATS to steal elections.
20 posted on
11/02/2003 7:44:32 AM PST by
Kuksool
To: Carbonsteel
hmmmm well, I know two women who are gay who are foster/adoptive parents to 8 black children, half of whom are deaf. All eight of the children excel in English and sign language. They make sure their kids have the best education possible so have moved out of state to make sure that happens. I also know another couple who are raising two little girls. These women are professional. Their children do not lack for male role models. The grandparents are very much a part of these kids lives. I think it doesn't matter.
21 posted on
11/02/2003 8:10:40 AM PST by
merry10
To: Carbonsteel
The argument most frequently used in favor of gays adopting children is that there are huge crowds of unwanted children who would otherwise languish in orphanages if gays are not allowed to adopt them. The truth is that there is a long waiting list of childless heterosexual couples who want to adopt. Gay adoption advocates want to be put at the head of the line and given preference over heterosexual families.
24 posted on
11/02/2003 8:20:24 AM PST by
Alouette
(Neocon Zionist Media Operative)
To: Carbonsteel
The ACLU is not just now "turning leftward". It was set up decades ago as a communist/Marxist/Christian-hating front organization. It still is.
It employs tried-and-true leftist strategery to take up a mild conservative cause at widely-spaced intervals to facilitate maintainance of their facade.
Leni
To: Carbonsteel
27 posted on
11/02/2003 8:28:19 AM PST by
lowbridge
(As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly. -Mr. Carlson, WKRP in Cincinnati)
To: Carbonsteel
You're absolutely right that queers (sorry, there is nothing "gay" about them) should NOT be adopting children. It is difficult, if not impossible, for many HETEROSEXUAL couples to adopt children. Many agencies do not allow single heterosexuals to adopt children either, or if they do they limit them to children that no one else will adopt. So tell me, how is it that all of a sudden, perverts can stroll into an adoption agency and demand to adopt a child because it is their RIGHT? GIVE ME A BREAK!
28 posted on
11/02/2003 8:35:57 AM PST by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Carbonsteel
"the wide array of life options it endorses seems to no longer include a belief in the traditional American way." Hey Dennis, any connectin between the ACLU and ANYTHING traditionally American at all, is purely accidental, coincidental and only because they live here.
29 posted on
11/02/2003 8:36:28 AM PST by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Carbonsteel
I know Gay Couples who are loving, smart and generous. I think putting kids in those stable homes (by stable I mean with couples who have been together for many years and have shown themselves to be productive members of society) are better than in State run homes or the Foster Care System. I know I am going to be attacked for this, so go right ahead.
31 posted on
11/02/2003 8:47:15 AM PST by
Hildy
To: Carbonsteel
Haven't a clue? They know EXACTLY what their doing.
35 posted on
11/02/2003 10:13:50 AM PST by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson