Skip to comments.
CA: Instant immigrant job check in danger
OC Register ^
| 11/1/03
| Dena Bunis
Posted on 11/01/2003 9:17:58 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:26 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: danger; immigrant; immigrantlist; instant; jobcheck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
How SAVE works
SAVE, the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, allows employers in California, Texas, Illinois, Florida, Nebraska and New York to voluntarily enroll and check new employee's Social Security numbers and immigration status against federal databases. Here's how it works:
Employer inputs employee name, Social Security number, date of birth, hire date, status in the United States and type of identification documents presented into a computer program.
Information is matched electronically against information in the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security immigration databases.
Possible outcomes:
1. The system confirms the information and the employee is authorized to work.
2. The information does not match, and that results in a "tentative non-confirmation." Employer notifies the employee, who can contest it either with the Social Security Administration or immigration officials. The employee has eight working days to correct the record and establish work eligibility.
If an employee is referred to immigration officials, they'll be given a toll-free number and talk to an immigration status verifier, who will try to resolve the case. Then an answer will be sent electronically to the employer within one day.
If an employee is referred to the Social Security Administration, he must go to a local Social Security office. Within 24 hours of the employee going to the local office, the employer must resubmit the case to get a final determination.
To: NormsRevenge
Democrats see value in the program but say Republicans tried to ram the extension through this past week without enough debate.Classic stalling tactic. "We need more debate." They do this on every issue. If it were up to them, we'd be debating until doomsday.
To: NormsRevenge
I suspect that over 95% of the employers in California aren't even aware of the system. Of that 95% an equally large amount probably wouldn't use the system without some incentive.
To: Amerigomag
I suspect that over 95% of the employers in California aren't even aware of the system.On another thread on this, some businessman from Texas said he never heard of it and opined it was geared towards the larger companies, when in fact most of the illegal hiring is done by the smaller operations.
Of that 95% an equally large amount probably wouldn't use the system without some incentive.
Yeah, they would look on it as added bookkeeping overhead. However, if the syetem was available and the company didn't use it, a stiff fine per illegal might be the proper motivator.
4
posted on
11/01/2003 11:32:12 AM PST
by
Oatka
To: *immigrant_list; .cnI redruM; 07055; 1ofmanyfree; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; ...
Illegal Immigrant Ping
5
posted on
11/01/2003 11:56:37 AM PST
by
XHogPilot
To: XHogPilot
Bump to the Top
6
posted on
11/01/2003 11:58:10 AM PST
by
XHogPilot
To: XHogPilot
Thanks, but I already get WAY too many pings...
7
posted on
11/01/2003 11:58:45 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: The Old Hoosier
Classic stalling tactic. "We need more debate." They do this on every issue. If it were up to them, we'd be debating until doomsday. You're right. What's to debate? This seems like a pretty cut and dried issue if you look at it logically (which Dims don't.)
Again, they fail the grasp the simple concept of the word "illegal."
8
posted on
11/01/2003 12:00:26 PM PST
by
Allegra
To: NormsRevenge
A workable program will be absolutely essential to even begin to deal with illegal immigration.
9
posted on
11/01/2003 12:02:26 PM PST
by
Scenic Sounds
(Me caigo a mis rodillas y hablo a las estrellas de plata. "¿Qué misterios usted está encubriendo?")
To: NormsRevenge
thanks for the ping... and the problem with this system is what??? It's only a problem for illegal aliens, not legal immigrants with legitimate papers.
10
posted on
11/01/2003 12:06:05 PM PST
by
cyborg
(Kyk nou, die ding wat jy soek issie hierie sienj)
To: The Old Hoosier
If it were up to them [the demoncats], we'd be debating until doomsday.They are trying to create Doomsday.
To: NormsRevenge
Change "illegal aliens" to "guns" and the Demoncats would do everything in their power to make sure a nationwide system was in place, and mandatory prison sentences were given to all who didn't comply.... Oh wait, there is already a program like that - The Brady Bill.
Yes we can count on the Party of Treason to make sure that illegal aliens and terrorists can roam without fear of prosecution, while American citizens who simply wish to defend themselves against illegal aliens, criminals and terrorists - or simply wish to "put food on the table" are required by Fe'ral Law to check their 2nd Amendment at the door, pay a fee, and wait for the Fe'ral Government to allow one American citizen to sell another American citizen a chunk of metal and polymer.
Since Demoncats hate laws and seem to enjoy their jihad against Western culture, Freedom and Prosperity; I wonder if they wouldn't mind if we elected an illegal alien to replace them in Congress. Can't do any worse.
To: Admin Moderator
Could you add to Front Page News?
To: NormsRevenge
...the INS and SSA were not accessible enough to employers," said Rep. Loretta Sanchez, who voted no on the bill. "Thirty-nine percent of employers said that SSA never returned their calls and 43 percent reported that INS didn't return their calls promptly," said Sanchez, D-Santa Ana. If the program went nationwide, she said, businesses would be more frustrated.
So Ms. Sanchez says the system isnt perfect so it should be scrapped, yet:
By January, employers who now must use special software and a modem to access the data will be able to go to a Web site for the same information.
Problem solved. Round em up, move em out.
14
posted on
11/01/2003 12:41:17 PM PST
by
NewRomeTacitus
("This burka is killing me." - Saddam, last week.)
To: NormsRevenge
More PC pandering to hispanics. The "elected ones" who refuse to encourage immigration laws to be enforced should be thrown out on their butts come election time, including President Bush.
All the legislation favoring illegal aliens seems to pass easily, but anything that might actually help solve the problem gets lost in red tape, and the ones in power continue to vote against what the majority of America wants. They should not be re-elected.
15
posted on
11/01/2003 12:46:34 PM PST
by
janetgreen
(TANCREDO FOR PRESIDENT)
To: Allegra
These Capitol Hill clowns couldn't even agree on the color of fresh snow.
To: janetgreen
I'm with you. And if Tancredo ever runs for president I will get very active politically for the first time on my life.
17
posted on
11/01/2003 1:39:18 PM PST
by
Mears
To: janetgreen
Oops! "In my life"
18
posted on
11/01/2003 1:40:18 PM PST
by
Mears
To: NewRomeTacitus
So Ms. Sanchez says the system isnt perfect so it should be scrapped, yet: Let's see by this logic the IRS and federal income taxes should also be scrapped because after 60 years they're still corrupt. Wonder if any democrats would call for that?
To: NormsRevenge
The duplicitous Democrats and the immigration lawyers lobby always talk about it being a problem of employers demanding and hiring illegal aliens. About stopping illegal immigration from the employer's end, instead of the employee's end. The duplicitous Democrats always talk about punishing the employers rather than the poor noble downtrodden Mexicans who just come here to earn money for his starving family in Mexico. (/barf)
Here's a program that helps the honest employer obey the law and the Democrats sabotage it.
20
posted on
11/01/2003 2:16:19 PM PST
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson