Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marijuana activist dies following explosion
Ottawa Citizen ^ | November 1, 2003 | James Gordon

Posted on 11/01/2003 9:04:19 AM PST by Loyalist

CREDIT: Jonathan Hayward, The Canadian Press

Don Appleby died of his injuries suffered in an Oct. 12 explosion while he was trying to make a concentrated oil using marijuana and butane.

Don Appleby's fight against the aids virus that was sapping him was made more difficult by a tragic paradox. While the Ottawa man was one of the few Canadians who could legally smoke marijuana for medicinal purposes, he could rarely afford it due to his minuscule disability pension.

In the end, he was killed in the struggle to produce the drug that was helping him survive.

On Oct. 12, Mr. Appleby was in the bathroom of his Blake Boulevard apartment, trying a dangerous method to get some use out of the non-smokable parts of his marijuana plants.

By injecting butane into a plastic container with the plant in it, he hoped to make a concentrated oil he could use. Friends suspect he then tried to light a joint, igniting an explosion that blew the bathroom door off its hinges.

Residents of the apartment above his heard the explosion, and rushed him to the Ottawa Hospital's General campus. It's where he remained in intensive care since the incident, and where he died Thursday morning.

Ron Whelan was Mr. Appleby's close friend, and was living under the same circumstances. He said yesterday that Mr. Appleby never should have died the way he did.

Both 44, they received about $900 a month on disability, not nearly enough to pay for both marijuana and food. While the government would pay for the $1,500-$2,000 of aids medication Mr. Appleby needed, they wouldn't pick up the cost of the marijuana. Nausea was a side-effect of the pills, and without the drug, he couldn't keep them down.

Forced to buy marijuana himself and pay rent, his friends say Mr. Appleby was reduced to scrounging through dumpsters to find the food he could no longer afford. He would go searching behind restaurants late at night so nobody would see him. At the same time, he wasn't shy about asking people with marijuana gardens to help him.

"You do what you have to do to survive, whether it's beg, borrow or steal," Mr. Whelan said. If one had a bag of dry macaroni from the food bank, he would often go to the other's place to share.

Mr. Appleby decided to try and save some money by growing his own marijuana, and after two failed gardens, things were starting to work out for him. Still, the cost to grow was still high. With no other source of medicine, he resorted to the butane method. He never recovered from the burns that covered 75 per cent of his body and his scorched lungs.

Mr. Whelan said although Mr. Appleby experienced difficult times in the past, he really blossomed after meeting people similar to him. He loved participating in marijuana rallies, and helping others.

"The world needs more people like Donny," he said. "He was there for the underdog, and it's a terrible loss for everyone who knew him."

Mr. Whelan said he doesn't blame the government for what happened to his friend, but said it should take more responsibility and provide for people like him.

© Copyright 2003 The Ottawa Citizen


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 420; chronic; darwin; darwinaward; donappleby; explosion; ganja; grass; hippylettuce; marijuana; maryjane; pot; puffthis; reefer; spliff; warondrugs; weed; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-333 next last
To: CWOJackson
Also, try clotted cream and black current preserves on a scone for breakfast with some good coffee

Gotta love those canucky's. "Clotted cream" is probably homemade cool whip and the canucky's probably look their nose down at us, for using cool whip.

I made Sunday dinner yesterday for my parents and if I would had served the pumpkin pie with "clotted cream", instead of "cool whip", they would have given me a look saying "what the F you talking about".

Amazing how different words about the same thing can mean different things to people.

301 posted on 11/03/2003 12:13:41 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
You misread. I said that your judgement was that butane should not be criminalized. You said that the principle on which this judgement is based is that it's not yet a widespread problem.
302 posted on 11/03/2003 12:32:36 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson; jmc813; Loyalist
Gotta go, and thank you all for the great conservation at the end of this thread.

Loyalist, just to show that I ain't 100% anti-Canucky, and as a twist of fate one of Canada's greatest exports best tune came on my local radio station, BTO with "Taking care of Business".

You all take care.

303 posted on 11/03/2003 12:45:35 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Thanks for the baseless and worthless opinion.

Truth hurts, huh?

304 posted on 11/03/2003 1:46:49 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
Normally, the first person who mentions Hitler or the Nazis in a conversation on FR automatically loses, but since you misspelled Hitler, I don't know quite what to think.
305 posted on 11/03/2003 1:53:20 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
My question is what your standard is for deciding what dual-use technologies/products should be criminalized. I understand you believe all drugs that are currently illegal should stay illegal. What I'm trying to understand is what consistent principle you apply when you form an opinion on what dual-use items such as butane, pipes, hemp, etc. should or should not be prohibited.
306 posted on 11/03/2003 2:12:53 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: ellery
"is what consistent principle you apply when you form an opinion on what dual-use items such as butane, pipes, hemp, etc. should or should not be prohibited. "

My personal consistent principle? I would say, "1) According to the manner in which the product is advertised for use, and/or 2) According to the manner in which the product is actually used.

When applying the above, I take into consideration the scope (if any) of the legitimate use of the product.

Remember the McDonalds plastic coffee stirrers that had a little spoon at the end? Turns out that the spoon was exactly .1 cc, the ideal heroin dose. That met my #1, but failed #2.

307 posted on 11/03/2003 4:13:21 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude!
308 posted on 11/03/2003 4:14:23 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
You're fighting for legitimacy. You want society to endorse your irresponsible, selfish, self-centered, nihilistic, hedonistic, childish, lifstyle choice by making drugs legal.

Lose the ad hominems. I don't do drugs (nor have I ever voted libertarian) and neither do most of the libertarians here. And if I do wind up occasionally toking on a joint at a party, I don't feel the need to go so far as to change laws in order to justify it.
309 posted on 11/03/2003 6:15:57 PM PST by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
I thought it was Messcans raping white wimmin, not zoot suited Nergros they feared.
310 posted on 11/03/2003 6:30:04 PM PST by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
He should watch a real sport like pro wrestling.
311 posted on 11/03/2003 6:31:07 PM PST by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
You threw yourself in with the rest of the pro-dopers when you asked the question. So you get thrown in when it's answered.

If you take this as a personal ad hominem, then maybe next time you'll phrase the question differently.

312 posted on 11/04/2003 5:36:44 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Let's make a pool about how long it takes LeRoy to join the "show" at the BB over at LP.

Why would I want to go preach to the choir, when I can educate FR lurkers by thumping WODdies here?

313 posted on 11/04/2003 5:59:05 AM PST by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
what does that have to do with his post?

I just wanted to be sure he waasn't setting himself up for a disappointment.

314 posted on 11/04/2003 6:00:02 AM PST by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
not very many lurkers come to these threads

Thanks for the baseless and worthless opinion.

Truth hurts, huh?

Provide evidence for your claim that it is the truth that not very many lurkers come to these threads.

315 posted on 11/04/2003 6:08:39 AM PST by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Truth and cinFLA do not go together.
316 posted on 11/04/2003 6:28:41 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: ellery
"I said that your judgement was that butane should not be criminalized. You said that the principle on which this judgement is based is that it's not yet a widespread problem."

Partly true.

First, we don't have a "problem" with people using butane to squeeze out the last drops of THC from low-content hemp.

Second, IF it became a problem, we'd have to ask ourselves why it became a problem (ie., what's different).

Third, IF it was determined that some kind of restriction on butane was the solution, then I proposed a voluntary addition of impurities to the butane by the manufacturer.

Lastly, IF those voluntary additions weren't being done, then I stated that I would go to plan B, federal mandatory addition.

Nowhere, ever, did I say that butane should be criminalized, or that butane should be banned.

317 posted on 11/04/2003 6:44:39 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Now someone post a Kournakova picture.


318 posted on 11/04/2003 7:01:43 AM PST by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"We pro-druggies refuse to believe that pot causes white women to sleep with negro jazz musicians, much to your chagrin as well"

Totally off topic. Shows that a pro-druggie doesn't think very clearly.

319 posted on 11/04/2003 9:45:28 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"We pro-druggies refuse to believe that pot causes white women to sleep with negro jazz musicians, much to your chagrin as well"Totally off topic.

Henry Anslinger's (the father of the Drug War) comments about white women having sex with black jazz musicians has as much validity as your claim that pot kills brain cells.

320 posted on 11/04/2003 10:03:16 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-333 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson