Skip to comments.
Profane Pumpkin Creates A Stir
wlky ^
| 10-31-03
Posted on 10/31/2003 10:19:11 AM PST by wheelgunguru
13-Year-Old Girl Carved Words 'Just For Laughs'
DETROIT -- There's an empty spot on the porch at a house in Warren, Mich. where a pumpkin used to sit.
The profane pumpkin, crudely carved and on the front porch of the home, was taken away after it created a stir with neighbors.
The pumpkin was carved by 13-year-old Christina Hall and said the crude display was "just for laughs." The pumpkin contained the words "(expletive) off."
"That's just inappropriate," said Carrie White, an outraged neighbor, who lives next door to the cursing pumpkin.
She called Warren police and sent an e-mail to Mayor Mark Steenburgh, who promised to contact the chief of police.
The response was "Sorry, we can't help you," White told WDIV TV. It seems the pumpkin is protected by the First Amendment and it's a case of freedom of speech.
The pumpkin is now gone, however. Warren police changed their position on the issue, saying if the object causes a public disturbance, they can remove it or order it removed.
In this case, the family removed it themselves Thursday night before police arrived and it's now in the trash.
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: fword; halloween
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: wheelgunguru
her parents allowed this!?!?!?!?
To: wheelgunguru
Good to know kids are practicing spelling during non-school hours.
3
posted on
10/31/2003 10:21:12 AM PST
by
GSWarrior
To: wheelgunguru
Oh NO, you don't want to make Carrie White mad. Just ask Piper Laurie...
4
posted on
10/31/2003 10:21:15 AM PST
by
Treebeard
(dirtypillows)
To: wheelgunguru
She called the cops on a pumpkin?! It never occured to her to go chat with the neighbor and ask them to take it down?
5
posted on
10/31/2003 10:21:48 AM PST
by
discostu
(You figure that's gotta be jelly cos jam just don't shake like that)
To: wheelgunguru
Some people just don't like sharing their candy. (I'm one of them.)
To: wheelgunguru
7
posted on
10/31/2003 10:23:48 AM PST
by
Koblenz
(There's usually a free market solution)
To: discostu
The kind of neighbor that would allow this sort of thing isn't someone you want or should talk to.
To: wheelgunguru
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
9
posted on
10/31/2003 10:23:57 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: wheelgunguru
10
posted on
10/31/2003 10:24:33 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
To: wheelgunguru
""That's just inappropriate," said Carrie White, an outraged neighbor, who lives next door to the cursing pumpkin."
However, it might be appropriate if William Judas Clinton lived across the street. It certainly would be an fitting message for him.
11
posted on
10/31/2003 10:25:18 AM PST
by
punster
To: Tijeras_Slim
that's hilarious! where can I find that pic? :>
12
posted on
10/31/2003 10:25:46 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: KantianBurke
13
posted on
10/31/2003 10:26:52 AM PST
by
Koblenz
(There's usually a free market solution)
To: wheelgunguru
Public disturbance on Private Property?
What a crock. Could political signs be called a disturbance? Bumper stickers? Newspapers?
14
posted on
10/31/2003 10:28:16 AM PST
by
CyberCowboy777
(After taking several readings, I'm surprised to find my mind still fairly sound.)
To: KantianBurke
15
posted on
10/31/2003 10:29:49 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
To: wheelgunguru
"The pumpkin is now gone, however. Warren police changed their position on the issue, saying if the object causes a public disturbance, they can remove it or order it removed."
Yep, time to nix the 1st, another in a long line of progression to the police state!
16
posted on
10/31/2003 10:30:49 AM PST
by
CSM
(Shame on me for attacking an unarmed person, a smoke gnatzie!)
To: wheelgunguru
if the object causes a public disturbance Now, there's a excuse that could be tailored for any occasion of abuse. Goodbye, 1st amendment.
17
posted on
10/31/2003 10:34:18 AM PST
by
TexasRepublic
(Liberal = Socialist = Communist)
To: Tijeras_Slim
To: CyberCowboy777
Could political signs be called a disturbance? During the Lewinsky affair I had a life size Bill Clinton mannequin on my porch. Attached to the rail, right infront of the fully clothed mannequin's crotch, was a beauty school practice head wearing a red beret.
The local sherriff's office came by and told my husband to remove the display because they had received a complaint. We had received hundreds of compliments, but being a law-abiding type, my husband complied.
The next morning I resurrected the display. I told my husband I was willing to take it all the way to the Supreme Court if need be.
The police never returned. I guess they spoke with their lawyers.
To: wheelgunguru
One's a cactus; the other is a gourd (sort of pumpkin-related):
20
posted on
10/31/2003 10:53:07 AM PST
by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson