[Libertarianize the GOP]

ping

[Onelifetogive]

OK, where is the ballsy Republican who will go on TV and read a list of names of Senators who voted YES on this AFTER 20 or so fire deaths and billions of dollars in fire damage, but would not vote YES BEFORE the losses.

[chachacha]

What a bunch of opportunists. Don't America ever get tired of this vote pandering but, only when and if you have to. This is sooooooooooooooooo convenient.

What does it take to convince a Democrat that they are thee problem.

[Uncle Miltie]

Dozens dead, thousand of homes burned, and hundreds of thousands of acres later, the Dems admit they were wrong to block sensible legislation.

When liberal policies crater (California, '70's Taxes, Forests, Welfare, Cold War) they come around too late. The collateral damage we incur while they live out their fantasies is horrific.

[daviddennis]

Okie, what do you think of the passages protecting old growth forests?

If I have understood your own writings and those of others, it's old growth forests that are exactly the problem - if they are not thinned, they're endangered.

Am I missing anything, or is this still a pretty dangerous compromise?

D

[farmfriend]

Rights, farms, environment ping.

Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.

For real time political chat - Radio Free Republic chat room

[Dark Wing]

fyi