Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie; azkathy
Okie, what do you think of the passages protecting old growth forests?

If I have understood your own writings and those of others, it's old growth forests that are exactly the problem - if they are not thinned, they're endangered.

Am I missing anything, or is this still a pretty dangerous compromise?

D
11 posted on 10/30/2003 9:23:58 AM PST by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: daviddennis
We have 190 million acres of forest at risk of catastrophic fire. The HFI promises to spend $100 billion thinning 10 million acres, and plans to use exclusively fire to manage those lands after that. As far as I am concerned it is little more than a cynical ruse.

I won't make a generalization like "old growth is the problem," since I view such things on an individual case basis, but I would say that many old growth forests are at risk largely due to accumulations of undergrowth.

My understanding is that the HFI was largely written by the Wilderness Society. IMHO, when considering the magnitude of our nation's forestry problems, it's stupid, it's expensive, it's bureaucratic, it's too little, and too late... but it is a start. At least they have acknowledged that there is a problem. They don't understand the causes much less the solutions. I think the longer term is much more serious than we realize.

I've stayed out of the day to day fire stuff because I find most people's understanding of what needs to be done so upsetting. I have put up one little rant you might find useful. Have you dug very far into the book?

12 posted on 10/30/2003 9:49:59 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson