Skip to comments.
Gephardt Plows Down Dean in Iowa
Talon News ^
| 10/29/03
| Charles Mahaleris
Posted on 10/29/2003 6:57:52 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Not content with merely retaking the lead in Iowa, Congressman Dick Gephardt on Tuesday continued to plow through Howard Dean with new attacks on the Vermonter's lack of support for retirement entitlements. During a speech detailing his plan to solve Iowa's Medicare reimbursement disparity, Gephardt (D-MO) continued to attack Dean (D-VT) even though polls in Iowa now show the former House minority leaders winning in those first in the nation caucuses.
Gephardt said on Tuesday, "As you might imagine, there are clear differences in this campaign on the issue of Medicare, specifically Medicare reimbursements. In 1993, Howard Dean called Medicare 'one of the worst things that ever happened.' He said it was 'one of the worst federal programs ever.' Howard Dean said Medicare should be a 'wholly managed care program.' And most importantly, he supported the 1995 Republican plan to cut Medicare by $270 billion dollars. Well, that plan would have devastated rural health care."
Gephardt continued, "As Tom Harkin said at the time, under the Medicare reimbursement formula, Iowa hospitals alone would have lost over $1,200 dollars for every Medicare case, costing Iowa health care billions of dollars."
He charged that Dean continued to support decreases in funding for Medicare after Democrats had prevented cuts to the entitlement program two years prior.
"But two years later, the 1997 Balanced Budget Act cut $200 billion dollars from Medicare, cuts that Howard Dean still supports to this day, saying quote 'I believe I'm a farsighted person.' Well, to me, there's nothing more shortsighted than trying to balance the budget by cutting Medicare," Gephardt said.
Dean's staff shot back almost instantly.
"It may be close to Halloween, but it's time for Dick Gephardt to stop scaring seniors," Dean Campaign Manager Joe Trippi said on Tuesday.
He continued, "Dick Gephardt has had 27 years in Washington to provide universal health insurance, a prescription drug benefit for our seniors or health coverage for our children. And what do Americans have as a result? Nothing. And while Washington politicians talked, Dr. Dean was delivering health care to thousands with his own hands, and as Governor, Howard Dean delivered health care for nearly every child in Vermont and a real prescription drug benefit for seniors who need help. We need a President who has a record of results, not a record of rhetoric."
Last week, a Zogby poll of 500 likely Democrat caucus voters in Iowa gave Gephardt a 1 point lead over Dean (22% to 21%). Likewise, a poll released on October 17 by Democracy Corps showed Gephardt at 27% and Dean with 26%.
Gephardt also went on the offensive against Dean in New Hampshire recently, although, realisticly, the mid-west lawmaker does not stand any chance of capturing the Granite State.
Nationally, though, Gephardt is a factor. A CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll conducted over the weekend across the nation shows the top of the field of nine Democrats being very tight.
In that poll, Dean has 16% support, Wesley Clark (D-AR) has 15%, and Gephardt has 12%. That's a statistical dead heat, considering the margin of error for the poll is plus or minus 6 points.
Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) tied with Gephardt in that poll, and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) captured 10% support. The other candidates scored in the single digits.
Dean is expected to easily win New Hampshire but his strong showing in Iowa has forced Gephardt to spend more time and resources campaigning in a state he should have secured months ago.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; dean; electionpresident; gephardt; howarddean; iowa
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Howard Dean delivered health care for nearly every child in Vermont and a real prescription drug benefit for seniors who need help."
Medicaid cuts will affect thousands of Vermonters
January 23, 2002
By DAVID MACE
Vermont Press Bureau
MONTPELIER Tens of thousands of Vermonters would see their state health care benefits rolled back or cut off completely under Gov. Howard Deans proposed budget, which seeks to wring $16.5 million in savings from Medicaid.
In an effort to curb costs in a rapidly expanding part of the social services budget, Dean is proposing to require many people who got coverage under his expansions of Medicaid programs to pay for a greater share of their health care.
Medicaid is the state-run program that uses both state and federal money to provide benefits to the poor and disabled. Over the past several years Dean has expanded the programs by allowing participation by Vermonters with incomes higher than the federal guidelines.
Under the proposed budget, about 3,200 elderly or disabled Vermonters who get half the cost of long-term drugs paid for under a program called VScript Expanded would see their benefits disappear. This would save the state nearly $2.5 million. A single Vermonter with an annual income up to $19,332 is currently eligible.
And even those making less who are covered under the states standard VScript program will see their costs rise.
Currently, a single person with an income as high as $15,036 is eligible to have all their long-term drugs covered for only a $1 or $2 co-payment.
Under Deans proposal, those people about 3,200 are currently enrolled would be required to pay half the costs of their drugs, though they would not have to pay more than $750 out of pocket in a year. This would save the state an estimated $800,000.
And Vermonters who get help paying for drugs under the Vermont Health Access Plan, or VHAP Pharmacy, which covers all drugs and requires only a $1 or $2 co-payment, would also have to pay half the cost with a $750 limit.
Currently, about 10,300 people get such assistance, which is available to people with incomes up to $12,888 for a single person. The savings from making them pay half is estimated at nearly $2.7 million.
Finally, some 21,000 residents who get help paying for other medical care under VHAPs programs would see the services they get reduced and co-payments increased, such as a $250 co-payment for hospital treatment.
All Medicaid patients would see some benefits curtailed because the state would no longer pay for dentures, chiropractic, or podiatry services, and would limit prescription drug choices more severely.
Deans plan would also lower the amount the state pays to hospitals for treating Medicaid patients, rolling back an effort by the Legislature last year to beef up the reimbursement level and reduce cost-shifting.
Thats what occurs when the state and federal government dont pay enough to hospitals and doctors to cover the cost of treating patients on Medicaid and Medicare, the health care program for the elderly. Doctors and hospitals must then charge more to patients with insurance coverage, driving up insurance costs.
http://timesargus.nybor.com/Legislature/Story/41169.html
2
posted on
10/29/2003 7:05:03 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
People April 18, 2002
Gov. Howard Dean, Visiting Randolph
Predicts Cigarette Tax Will Go Up
ÐÏࡱ
Vermont's legislature will eventually agree to raise the cigarette tax by 67 cents per pack, as he first suggested last year. That was the prediction of Gov. Howard Dean at the Chamber of Commerce breakfast Monday at Vermont Technical College.
In his last appearance as an official guest at a legislative breakfast, Dean also cautioned that even with the major increase in cigarette taxes, the state must also make cuts in the Medicaid program, which is draining state coffers in Vermont and elsewhere.
Dean proposed the cigarette tax increase last year, but it went nowhere. This year he didn't propose a tax increasebut he thinks he'll get one.
The governor admitted that he "never expected" the legislature to accept the deep Medicaid cuts he proposed this year. To offset the cuts, legislators are looking at the cigarette tax increase, with even the Republican House agreeable to a tax in the 35-cent-per-pack area.
Dean predicted, however, that after the Senate weighs in, something like the full 67-cent tax increase will be passed.
Even then, he stressed "we will need cuts anyway, especially in pharmacy benefits."
Passing a big cigarette tax increase and cutting some Medicaid benefits will "supply a cushion" of several years for the Medicaid program, he argued. After those several years, the Medicaid funding shortfall is likely to return, he admitted.
http://www.rherald.com/News/2002/0418/People/p01.html
3
posted on
10/29/2003 7:08:38 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
That red headed Dick would not know a real plow if he fell over one.
4
posted on
10/29/2003 7:13:57 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Who did this title? The proper expression is "plowed under".
To: upcountryhorseman
The proper expression is "plowed under". Dadburned city slickers!
6
posted on
10/29/2003 11:28:52 AM PST
by
Aegedius
(Money can buy happiness. Money can buy love. Money can't buy class.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I think it's great that Democrats are accusing EACH OTHER of "Scaring Seniors"
Too...much...irony.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson