Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Army 'going to Linux'
The Register ^ | 10/27/2003 | John Lettice

Posted on 10/28/2003 5:46:38 PM PST by yhwhsman

US Army 'going to Linux' after OS switch for GI PDA
By John Lettice
Posted: 27/10/2003 at 15:44 GMT

The US Army has abandoned Windows and chosen Linux for a key component of its "Land Warrior" programme, according to a report in National Defense Magazine. The move, initially covering a personal computing and communications device termed the Commander's Digital Assistant (CDA), follows the failure of the previous attempt at such a device in trials in February of this year, and is part of a move to make the device simpler and less breakable.

According to program manager Lt Col Dave Gallop this is part of a broader move towards Linux by the US Army: "Evidence shows that Linux is more stable. We are moving in general to where the Army is going, to Linux-based OS." The trials of the earlier version, at Hunter Airfield in Georgia, showed it exceeding the permitted one mission failure per 158 hours, not having sufficient battery life and having its communications obstructed by trees. The latter objection seems a little harsh to us, given that trees are pretty hardware- and OS-agnostic, but what do we know?

The new devices are to be compatible with the new Stryker infantry vehicle, and hence come under the title Land Warrior Stryker Interoperable (SI). The previous was the LW-IC (Initial Capability). The LW-SI is intended to use the Stryker as a base station for recharging and downloading battlefield information, which would appear to provide a workaround for the limitations of the currently available communications systems.

General Dynamics Decision Systems was awarded a development contract in February, and the computer (or maybe computerish) part of the system will come in a number of shapes and sizes, depending on role. Standard infantry versions will be pretty light and rugged, but the "leader version" could have longer range radio, keyboard and handheld display. GDDS says it's also developing variants for medics, combat engineers and forward observers.

Even if Lt Col Gallop is slightly premature in predicting the military's imminent switch to Linux, it's adoption for Land Warrior is a pretty big deal, given that this could conceivably turn it into the base OS for the devices carried by every US soldier. According to to GDDS (FAQ here, project overview here) it's a first step on the path to the "Future Soldier", beginning to realise the US military's visions of the digitised battlefield, the tactical Internet and (new one on us) the Soldier as a System. There's an impressive big graphic of the roadmap here, which gives an idea of the CDA (currently 12 pounds), how it fits in, and the evolutionary/revolutionary approach being taken.

The Stryker, incidentally, is designated a "light armored vehicle", or LAV. We fear this may severely impact its marketability vis a vis the British Army, and caution the developers never, ever to designate one a LAV-E. ®


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: landwarrior; linux; operatingsystem; stryker; usarmy
Thought this was kinda interesting.
1 posted on 10/28/2003 5:46:39 PM PST by yhwhsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
Penguin Bump!
2 posted on 10/28/2003 5:47:24 PM PST by LibertyAndJusticeForAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
Yep, it's silly to use Windows in systems where security and stability are paramount.
3 posted on 10/28/2003 5:51:16 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
the real reason is $$$$$$$$
4 posted on 10/28/2003 6:00:15 PM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
bookmark
5 posted on 10/28/2003 6:04:05 PM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
I wonder why everyone is ignoring the fact that a company named IBM may be behind this??

People often forget that a few years ago IBM invested over US$1 billion porting Linux to run on IBM's AS/400 and S/390 big iron machines, and given IBM is a huge supplier of computer hardware and services to the US government small wonder why you see Linux being installed on many military systems.

6 posted on 10/28/2003 6:33:04 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"Evidence shows that Linux is more stable. We are moving in general to where the Army is going, to Linux-based OS."

Ping! Do you have a pic of Tux in fatigues? LOL

7 posted on 10/28/2003 6:41:03 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Anyone know how MS and Linux do head to head in the imbedded arena?
8 posted on 10/28/2003 7:11:09 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unix
Anyone know how MS and Linux do head to head in the imbedded arena?

I'm not an expert. So with that disclaimer, as far as what I know, MS has the biggest share though recent articles seem to indicate that Linux is making advances in the embedded market.

9 posted on 10/28/2003 8:58:12 PM PST by yhwhsman ("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

10 posted on 10/28/2003 10:21:59 PM PST by zeugma (Mozilla/Firebird - The King of Browsers... YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
Once again, The Register (foreign website) completely overexaggerates the success of Linux. Wasn't it just last month they claimed Ford Motor was completely switching to Linux, just to have Ford release a statement they weren't?

Now it's "US Army going to Linux", more complete bunk. Check some of these recent headlines to see what products the Army is actually investing in for IT infrastructure:

http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2002/0603/news-army-06-03-02.asp

http://philadelphia.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2003/06/16/story4.html

If the Linux crowd wasn't so full of BS they might get more respect.
11 posted on 10/29/2003 4:55:31 AM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
I wonder why everyone is ignoring the fact that a company named IBM may be behind this??

The plot thickens. I hear a company called Microsoft is behind Windows!

12 posted on 10/29/2003 5:15:11 AM PST by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: camas
the real reason is $$$$$$$$

LOL - since when has the government ever cared about that?

13 posted on 10/29/2003 5:24:03 AM PST by general_re ("I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Why do you assume that we "Linux zealots" universally respect The Register or agree with everything they put in print?

As a matter of fact, I think the editor (whatsisname) is a bitter little Eurosocialist whiner, and view most of what appears on the site with the appropriate measure of scepticism.

14 posted on 11/01/2003 9:45:00 AM PST by dwollmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
I wonder how that squares with this:

Wednesday, June 25, 2003

Microsoft wins biggest order in its history $470 million Army software deal covers 494,000 computers

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER STAFF AND NEWS SERVICES

Microsoft Corp. has won a six-year contract worth more than $470 million to provide software to the U.S. Army, the biggest order ever for the company's programs.

The deal covers 494,000 desktop computers, Microsoft spokesman Keith Hodson said. The Army will buy the software from a Microsoft reseller, Softmart, based in Downingtown, Pa. Hodson declined to say how the companies will divide the revenue.

The Defense Department has questioned the security of Microsoft and rival products in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

One of the department's server computers was attacked in March using a flaw in Microsoft's Windows program. The contract demonstrates that the Army has decided that Microsoft's security is sufficient, said Rob Enderle, an analyst at Forrester Research Inc.

"It looks like whatever that problem was, it wasn't great enough to stop the sale, or it was fixed," Enderle said. "The Army wouldn't buy this stuff if it still had exposures they couldn't mitigate."

In fact, Army leaders "stated openly that they put a lot of faith in the security of our platform," Hodson said, citing Microsoft's overall security model, its Trustworthy Computing initiative, and the enhanced security features in its Windows operating systems.

Full article here...

15 posted on 11/06/2003 5:25:08 PM PST by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson