Skip to comments.
Husband (Michael Schiavo) in Right-To-Die Case Rips Parents
Yahoo! News ^
| October 27, 2003
| VICKIE CHACHERE
Posted on 10/27/2003 8:29:28 PM PST by El Conservador
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-217 next last
To: woofie
You just hit the nail on the head, Woofie. And her parents swear they taught her to swallow... they fed her pudding behind Michael's back. But the staff at the nursing home and hospice were given strict instructions by Michael NOT to give Terri ANY therapy what so ever.
It's pretty easy to starve someone to death when they aren't even allowed water or nurishment, while the tube is removed. What's she supposed to do? Push the nurse's button and ask for some fried chicken? (Sorry... that was sarcasm)
101
posted on
10/27/2003 10:56:38 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: radiohead
I think you are right so how could all the courts carry their decisions to this extreme?
102
posted on
10/27/2003 10:56:42 PM PST
by
woofie
(I want to die peacefully in my sleep like Grandpa ...not screaming, like the passengers in his car)
To: woofie
Even if Michael was on the up and up about her "wishes", how can anyone be sure that he didn't just imagine her saying something once? Maybe he got it in his head somehow --- projecting what he would wish or what someone else had once said? It isn't safe to trust someone's memory 15 years down the road --- there is nothing more concrete than that --- no written documents, no other witnesses.
103
posted on
10/27/2003 10:57:06 PM PST
by
FITZ
Comment #104 Removed by Moderator
To: incindiary
Now I apologize for getting a little gross here myself, but is that logical? Would a brain-damaged woman have her legs almost "frozen" together?
Also along the same vein, if it is true, it could be a result of no therapy. With physical therapy, I doubt that would be allowed to happen, but I don't know for sure.
I wish someone could pursue it delicately with experts, as it could be a bold-faced lie.
Also, one might think there would be a catheter for ease of care in this type of situation which would need to be checked periodically. There was talk of using diapers, but that wouldn't necessarily indicate that she didn't have a catheter which I think would be normal in such a situation.
Please excuse the indelicacy and I wouldn't pursue it, but it could indicate a lie.
105
posted on
10/27/2003 10:57:52 PM PST
by
Aliska
Comment #106 Removed by Moderator
To: FITZ
but to trust everything to one man's memory of what someone might have said once over 15 years ago? People forget, and memories aren't always reliable.And people lie. That's why most states require a written declaration. It's my understanding that Florida is one of the few that will take an oral statement.
What bothers me is that, to my understanding, the statement was uncorroborated, right? As a lawyer, I'd be loathe to advance the argument that we should unplug or stop feeding someone based on one person's oral testimony of something that happened 15 years ago. But that's just me...maybe that's why I don't practice anymore.
To: STARWISE
Did you catch the part about Michael being so happy that he has TWO WOMEN in his life to love or some crap like that. I thought I was going to THROW UP all over the carpet. Good Heavens!!!
108
posted on
10/27/2003 10:59:52 PM PST
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Humidston
extraordinary method of keeping someone alive Normally one wouldn't, but I thought I read somewhere here that it is considered so as the laws are written in Florida.
Florida has become a real trouble-spot in this nation. The Gonzales mess, the election imbroglio, and now this.
109
posted on
10/27/2003 10:59:55 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: woofie
My question is IF she had a "living will" with instuctions not to use heroic measures to keep her alive would they remove the feeding tube? Don't know. Her parents have a web site if you want to ask them.
110
posted on
10/27/2003 11:00:05 PM PST
by
concerned about politics
( Maybe, could be, I think., what if, is it true?, I heard..............................)
To: concerned about politics
Michael Schiavo is an evil monster and his lawyer is even worse. End times alert.
111
posted on
10/27/2003 11:01:17 PM PST
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: El Conservador
Prayers for Terri
112
posted on
10/27/2003 11:03:09 PM PST
by
Dajjal
To: Saundra Duffy
I think you're on to something. Actually I hope you are. How long, O Lord? I can't help thinking of my children and grandchildren and the horrors they may face.
113
posted on
10/27/2003 11:04:04 PM PST
by
Aliska
To: woofie
The judge that usually has made decisions slanted in Michael's favor is Judge Greer. It's been in his court for years.
Many of us question his neutrality since he also is or was on the board of directors at this same hospice and the hospice is under investigation for defrauding Medicare for millions of bogus claims. This plot goes very very deep!
BTW, Felos - Michael's death lawyer is or was also on that board!
114
posted on
10/27/2003 11:04:13 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: El Conservador
"This is Terri's wish," he said of the removal of her feeding tube. "And I am going to follow that if this is the last thing I can do for Terri." Just one problem Mikey .. On Gretta's show, she found a document where you refuse to remove the tube shorty after her colapse because that's what you claimed Terry would want
So which is it????
115
posted on
10/27/2003 11:04:57 PM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: concerned about politics
I think Radiohead answered it in #95...If you want to be certain, a person has to state specifically in writing that they dont want a feeding tube if they cant eat, something that no one thinks of
116
posted on
10/27/2003 11:05:50 PM PST
by
woofie
(I want to die peacefully in my sleep like Grandpa ...not screaming, like the passengers in his car)
To: woofie
I think you are right so how could all the courts carry their decisions to this extreme? There was another thread linking the whole chain of legal people to Hospice. If I remember right, the sherif, the lawyer, the judge? Hospice is an organization that helps people die.
117
posted on
10/27/2003 11:06:47 PM PST
by
concerned about politics
( Maybe, could be, I think., what if, is it true?, I heard..............................)
To: Saundra Duffy
You know - speaking of him "loving" two women.... What if he's just using Terri as an excuse for not marrying Jodi and making her an honest woman??!! LOL!! (I hope they read these threads!!!!)
118
posted on
10/27/2003 11:07:07 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Humidston
119
posted on
10/27/2003 11:07:43 PM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Aliska
I don't know... but the lack of therapy for the last 10 years is definitely part of the problem (and he's the one who has been denying her therapy)
And no problem, I was also going to say please excuse the indelicacy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson