To: Carry_Okie
I have a question? Surely there are some legal eagles on this site that would have an opinion.
What is the problem with returning fire and holding these enviro nuts accountable. If fuel load = hotter , bigger fires then, Why not sue the Sierra Club and many of these other groups for the cost of these wild fires.
They are the ones advocating, and litigating the policies that increase fuel load.
To: TASMANIANRED
27 posted on
10/26/2003 8:58:09 PM PST by
D_Okie
(Citizens Advocating Local Control of Our Forests)
To: TASMANIANRED
What is the problem with returning fire and holding these enviro nuts accountable. If fuel load = hotter , bigger fires then, Why not sue the Sierra Club and many of these other groups for the cost of these wild fires. They are the ones advocating, and litigating the policies that increase fuel load. President Clinton indemnified any NGO belonging to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) in EO-12986. It's unconstitutional as hell, but Bush has not rescinded it.
28 posted on
10/26/2003 9:13:54 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson