[TASMANIANRED]

I have a question? Surely there are some legal eagles on this site that would have an opinion.

What is the problem with returning fire and holding these enviro nuts accountable. If fuel load = hotter , bigger fires then, Why not sue the Sierra Club and many of these other groups for the cost of these wild fires.
They are the ones advocating, and litigating the policies that increase fuel load.

[D_Okie]

See http://www.waterforthewest.org for a billboard with
your message.

We may not be able to hold them legally responsible, but
we can do quite a lot to get out the truth about what is really happening.

Also, for a list of Resources, see
http://www.calcof.org/Resource_Links.php

http://www.calcof.org/forums/index.php for a forum on
Healhy Forests.

[Carry_Okie]

What is the problem with returning fire and holding these enviro nuts accountable. If fuel load = hotter , bigger fires then, Why not sue the Sierra Club and many of these other groups for the cost of these wild fires. They are the ones advocating, and litigating the policies that increase fuel load.

President Clinton indemnified any NGO belonging to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) in EO-12986. It's unconstitutional as hell, but Bush has not rescinded it.