Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TASMANIANRED
What is the problem with returning fire and holding these enviro nuts accountable. If fuel load = hotter , bigger fires then, Why not sue the Sierra Club and many of these other groups for the cost of these wild fires. They are the ones advocating, and litigating the policies that increase fuel load.

President Clinton indemnified any NGO belonging to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) in EO-12986. It's unconstitutional as hell, but Bush has not rescinded it.

28 posted on 10/26/2003 9:13:54 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
Executive Order 12986: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

The purpose of this Executive Order, signed January 18, 1996, is to extend to the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources the privileges and immunities that provide or pertain to immunity from suit under the International Organizations Immunities Act.

I cannot find anything to show what this actually does. Could you point me in the right direction?

Thank you.

55 posted on 10/28/2003 9:03:37 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson