It takes a village of cattle farmers to produce this much Methane.
To: .cnI redruM
Usually do not touch such posts not to say that I do not share the view.
But keeping this fang in the news only glorifies her position, it is like the citation index, for good or bad she is in the news. Most articles are against her, but she gains from it.
I appreciate your thoughts.
2 posted on
10/23/2003 9:26:35 AM PDT by
inPhase
To: .cnI redruM
And if the timorous Senate Republicans allowed a real trial, with live witnesses, Clinton would have been convicted. The Democrats knew he was guilty as sin and they hitched their wagons to him. And they can't figure out ever since why they've been losing even though Billy Boy has been out there campaigning for their party and their candidates. Call it the House Managers' Revenge.
3 posted on
10/23/2003 9:32:13 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: .cnI redruM
hurl
4 posted on
10/23/2003 9:38:01 AM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: .cnI redruM
read later
To: .cnI redruM
I'm gasping for air! Gasping, I tell you!
6 posted on
10/23/2003 9:41:13 AM PDT by
ysoitanly
To: .cnI redruM
You forgot, "I am not a dyke"
7 posted on
10/23/2003 9:42:50 AM PDT by
Porterville
(I am a cynical bastard; EU... FU, and liberal your derivative lifestyle will never be normalized.)
To: .cnI redruM
Herewith is an accounting just partial, I'm sure of some of deceptions, distortions, misrepresentations, and general howlers in Hillary's book. Perhaps foolishly, I'm trusting her on things like her assertion on page 363 of Living History that "I'm a pushover for big, stirring ceremonies." Lowry is really nailing both clintons to the wall.
I am sick of those who shrug and act like that couple are just a couple of politicians. They need to be denounced and called what they are, and Lowry is doing it very well, indeed.
8 posted on
10/23/2003 9:47:49 AM PDT by
cyncooper
(We call evil by its name...President George W. Bush to the Australian Parliament)
To: .cnI redruM
#27 is my favorite. Silly women just keep 'misinterpreting' Bill. lol
Pinz
To: .cnI redruM
Great post. Definitely one to bookmark. Thanks.
To: .cnI redruM
9) "Bill signed the legislation on August 10, 1993." (Page 179) THIS IS A TRUE STATEMENT!
Holey moley!
16 posted on
10/23/2003 11:39:25 AM PDT by
lowbridge
(As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly. -Mr. Carlson, WKRP in Cincinnati)
To: .cnI redruM
Clintoon received $12 million for his memoirs. Hitlery received $8 million for her memoirs. That totals $20 million for memories from two people who for 8 years repeatedly testified, under oath, that they couldn't remember anything.
To: .cnI redruM
bump
To: .cnI redruM
2) "Perhaps most important, the system would allow patients to choose their own doctors, a non-negotiable item in Bill's view." (Page 150) The thrust of Hillary health-care plan was to make it more difficult for people to choose their own doctors.
"More difficult"? Try next to impossible! Not only did she (and the reprehensible Ira Magaziner) want to criminalize choice of physicians, they also wanted to micromanage medical schools and training programs -- to ensure that enough minorities and women went into targeted specialties in targeted locations.
24) "Members of Starr's team, and Starr himself, appeared to be leaking secret grand jury testimony, which was against the law." (Page 406)
"Appeared" is a weasel word. Starr was absolved of making any illegal leaks.
Actually, I believe it was none other than the oozing Dick Morris who proved that the leaks were coming from the Clinton team. He was subpoenaed and told nobody other than his (long-suffering) wife, because he wanted to see if his upcoming appearance before the grand jury would be leaked, and it was not.
27) "He said that she had misinterpreted his attention, which was something I had seen happen dozens of times before. It was such a familiar scenario that I had little trouble believing the accusations were groundless." (Page 441)
It's unlikely that Clinton's attentions were so often "misinterpreted."
Yes, I can certainly understand how dropping trou and barking "Kiss it," and suggesting that a woman "put some ice on it" after he raped her (twice in a row!) can be misconstrued...
33) "With the whole world watching much of it wondering what the fuss was about Bill felt that the President of the United States couldn't afford to appear on television looking weak." (Page 468)
This refers to Clinton's speech after his grand-jury testimony. Mostly, he was just pissed. If he was so worried about the appearance of the presidency, he wouldn't have had Monica service him in the first place.
Actually, I can believe that he's primarily concerned with *appearances*. That's all he's about -- all surface, no substance. If he truly cared about the *institution* of the presidency and not just the appearance (not to mention his vain, ridiculous Legacy Quest), he would not have splooged the Oval Office sink.
21 posted on
10/23/2003 3:00:37 PM PDT by
NYC GOP Chick
(Cristy Lane's gaping nostrils scare me.)
To: .cnI redruM
Susan McDougal didn't talk because she wanted to live.
To: .cnI redruM
I can't wait to buy Rich Lowry's new book " Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years this weekend.
23 posted on
10/31/2003 2:58:05 PM PST by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson