Skip to comments.
Book on Genius Out.
The Wall Street Journal ^
| 23 Oct 03
| GARY ROSEN
Posted on 10/23/2003 8:24:25 AM PDT by sbw123
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:03 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Best and Brightest Charles Murray tries to quantify "Human Achievement."
BY GARY ROSEN Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:01 a.m.
In our age of overused superlatives, none stands in greater need of rehabilitation than "genius," a title that Leonardo now shares with such eminences as Warren Buffett and Eminem. Charles Murray's rough-and-ready test is whether an individual's work makes us ask, in wonder, "How can a human being have done that?" But he doesn't stop there. Incorrigible social scientist that he is, Mr. Murray wants to prove that supreme excellence actually exists in the arts and sciences. The result is "Human Accomplishment," a systematic effort to rate and rank the likes of Aristotle, Mozart and Einstein and to describe the conditions that have allowed them to flourish. Much of this brick of a book is devoted to explaining, in tiresome detail, just how Mr. Murray goes about quantifying the seemingly unquantifiable. His trick is to consult the experts--or, rather, to distill usable numbers from their encyclopedias, anthologies, general histories and biographical dictionaries. An individual making an appearance in at least 50% of the selected sources for a given field wins the label "significant figure." By Mr. Murray's reckoning, there have been 4,002 such "people who matter" in the period 800 B.C. to 1950. Each member of this Pantheon gets an "index score" on a 100-point scale, based on how much attention--pages, column inches, etc.--he receives in the specialist literature.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: achievement; bestandbrightest; bookreview; charlesmurray; civilization; contribution; correctness; culture; genius; humanaccomplishment; iq; political
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Well, this is by Charles Murray, so you know all the PC vultures will hate it. He examines 4,000 plus people who have made the greatest impact on the world. www.chapination.blogspot.com
1
posted on
10/23/2003 8:24:25 AM PDT
by
sbw123
To: sbw123
"Edison and Watt in technology" I'd be interested to see how Murray handles Tesla, the impact of whose work in our daily lives equals or exceeds those mentioned in the posted article.
To: sbw123
The next overused noun he needs to explore is HERO. When everyone is a hero, none truly stand out.
3
posted on
10/23/2003 8:48:04 AM PDT
by
wizr
To: sbw123
Soon as I saw this thread was about geniuses I just had to check it out and see what my peers have been up to. ;-)
4
posted on
10/23/2003 8:53:11 AM PDT
by
beckett
To: sbw123
Well, the liberals are going to HATE this book- although they are all convinced that THEY are far above average, it is not permissible to discuss diffrences in human cognitive abilities in polite society these days.
There is a really annoying "Public Service Announcement" that goes something like "Stupid kids are really brilliant- they just learn differently".
That pretty much sums it up for me.
5
posted on
10/23/2003 8:57:28 AM PDT
by
RANGERAIRBORNE
("Si vis pacem, para bellum"- still good advice after 2000 years.)
To: beckett
We're not in it. I checked.
To: sbw123
"Wealth matters, as does the critical mass of talent present only in elite cities."
Talent tends to find its way into cities because that is where the MONEY is. IMO, the West (glorious above all else, hahaha!) has flourished because of, for lack of a better word, capitalism; or, how about the free-market (o.k. more or less free). The bustling, rowdy, competitive market place is intimately tied to the West's fantastic record of geniuses.
To: sbw123
the West's rate of achievement has been in serious decline over the past century. In the sciences, whose progress is cumulative, we have simply exhausted many of the possibilities for fundamental advancement; the laws of nature can only be discovered once Now, THAT is a bizarrely naive statement.
The greatest inventions and advancements have been made in the last century.
True, there can be only one Newton [who should be ranked at the top of the 4,000 with Aristotle (leaving out Jesus, who outranks them all in importance)], but he never dreamed of quantum mechanics, nor of personal computers, nor of quarks, nor of - ad infinitum.
8
posted on
10/23/2003 9:06:15 AM PDT
by
fqued
(The mainstream media wouldn't over-rate anyone, would they?)
To: sbw123
I'm pining to buy it along with John Gribbin's The Scientists. Once a year there are books that are a real treat to add to one's collection. Charles Murray's work is a must have next to Paul Johnson's magisterial survey, Art: A New History. Oh and the conservative book lover should definitely NOT miss Jean Francois Revel's little tome just out, Anti-Americanism. Choices, choices, choices... sigh>
9
posted on
10/23/2003 9:11:00 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: sbw123
When Mr. Murray invokes the "Aristotelian principle" as the measure of artistic greatness--the notion that the highest human pleasures derive from appreciating complexity and refinement--he stands in the tradition of aristocracy and aristocratic connoisseurship. Then call me an aristocrat. And all of you leftists can kneel now, to receive your bread and stripes. ;)
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Some are. Such as Einstein - he about flunked out of shool.
And then there was the time he wanted to study the rate of growth in a house fire...
I thin the author makes some good point, but I strongly disagree with his assertion that the rate of progress is decaying.
It most certainly is not.
11
posted on
10/23/2003 9:17:39 AM PDT
by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
To: fqued
Except for that whole calculus thing, Newton stole his work from Keppler.
12
posted on
10/23/2003 9:20:18 AM PDT
by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
To: patton
I think it was Leibniz, Gottfried Leibniz, not Kepler, who was (is?) the other half of the calculus controversy.
To: macamadamia
Johannes Keppler derived "Newton's" laws numerically - Isaac Newton provided the closed form solutions. Both acts were pure genius, but Keppler is oft forgotten.
14
posted on
10/23/2003 9:38:24 AM PDT
by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
To: patton
"Some are. Such as Einstein - he about flunked out of shool." True- I am pretty familiar with Einstein's life, but I do not believe that American schools are being overwhelmed by a plague of kids so brilliant that they just can't be bothered to do the regular schoolwork.
I do think that we are raising the worst-educated generation in the history of this Nation- with consequences that are likely to be unfortunate. And making absurd excuses for these dummies is not going to help, in the long run.
15
posted on
10/23/2003 9:50:05 AM PDT
by
RANGERAIRBORNE
("Si vis pacem, para bellum"- still good advice after 2000 years.)
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I agree with you - but I gotta tell you, boring the kids out of school is still a problem, on a massive scale.
It is a constant struggle to keep the smart ones engaged. In many respects, "special education" has helped this - schools have adopted the idea that different kids learn differently. And that is good for the top end, too.
16
posted on
10/23/2003 9:55:27 AM PDT
by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
To: patton
What absolute garbage. This is straight from Wolfram:
"Newton singlehandedly contributed more to the development of science than any other individual in history."
He revolutionised mathematics, physics, optics and astronomy. To suggest that his work was the result of theft is without any merit.
Andrew
To: sbw123
btt
18
posted on
10/23/2003 9:57:13 AM PDT
by
Cacique
To: patton
Keppler is oft forgotten.Keppler who?
19
posted on
10/23/2003 10:00:19 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Proud member: "Old Crow and White Lightning Association" aka "MA power & light")
To: patton
Some are. Such as Einstein - he about flunked out of shool. No, he didn't. It was a grading method discrepancy when he changed schools.
20
posted on
10/23/2003 10:00:35 AM PDT
by
balrog666
(Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? -Abraham Lincoln)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson