Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Chief Navy Counsel Alleges Cover-Up by LBJ of 1967 Israeli Attack on U.S. Ship
AP ^

Posted on 10/22/2003 5:25:49 PM PDT by TheOtherOne

Former Chief Navy Counsel Alleges Cover-Up by LBJ of 1967 Israeli Attack on U.S. Ship

Published: Oct 22, 2003

advertisement

WASHINGTON (AP) - A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident.

In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."

Boston was senior legal counsel to the Navy's original 1967 review of the attack. He said in the sworn statement that he stayed silent for years because he's a military man, and "when orders come ... I follow them."

He said he felt compelled to "share the truth" following the publication of a recent book, "The Liberty Incident," which concluded the attack was unintentional.

The USS Liberty was an electronic intelligence-gathering ship that was cruising international waters off the Egyptian coast on June 8, 1967. Israeli planes and torpedo boats opened fire on the Liberty at what became known as the outbreak of the Israeli-Egyptian Six-Day War.

In addition to the 34 Americans killed, more than 170 were wounded.

Israel has long maintained that the attack was a case of mistaken identity, an explanation that the Johnson administration did not formally challenge. Israel claimed its forces thought the ship was an Egyptian vessel and apologized to the United States.

After the attack, a Navy court of inquiry concluded there was insufficient information to make a judgment about why Israel attacked the ship, stopping short of assigning blame or determining whether it was an accident.

It was "one of the classic all-American cover-ups," said Ret. Adm. Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.

"Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own?" Moorer asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack.

Moorer, who has long held that the attack was a deliberate act, wants Congress to investigate.

Israeli Embassy spokesman Mark Regev disputed any notion that Israel knowingly went after American sailors.

"I can say unequivocally that the Liberty tragedy was a terrible accident, that the Israeli pilots involved believed they were attacking an enemy ship," Regev said. "This was in the middle of a war. This is something that we are not proud of."

Calls to the Navy seeking comment were not immediately returned.

In Boston's statement, he does not say why Johnson would have ordered a cover-up. Attempts were made to reach Boston at his home in Coronado, Calif., but he did not return calls seeking comment.

Moorer's panel suggested several possible reasons Israel might have wanted to attack a U.S. ship. Among them: Israel intended to sink the ship and blame Egypt because it might have brought the United States into the 1967 war.

---

On the Net:

USS Liberty Memorial Web site: http://www.ussliberty.org

AP-ES-10-22-03 1943EDT



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; coverup; israel; liberty; thomasmoorer; ussliberty; warcrimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-269 next last
To: yonif
Many people think that military forces in combat have perfect situational awareness and know instantly when something happens.

In short, too many people get their knowledge of military science from Hollyweird.
81 posted on 10/22/2003 7:35:17 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory
Admiral Moorer wrote and published numerous articles on the truth of the Liberty incident at the time of the independent panel; this is not a late statement by him but by Ward Boston.

For what it's worth, it's not a "late statement", rather a filler by AP. Ward Boston has been saying this for about a year, since the Kristol book came out.

82 posted on 10/22/2003 7:35:21 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
There is also the fact that not all the Liberty crewmen support this fight against Israel (regarding this incident). Some of them believe it was a mistake.
83 posted on 10/22/2003 7:37:01 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Dr Zilman
Amen Doc.
84 posted on 10/22/2003 7:43:21 PM PDT by squirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: marktwain
Once they start digging....this might go off in various directions with dozens of people coming up to assert cover-ups all over the place. Both Kennedy murders would likely fall into this category...as well as MLK. While it would be a breathe of fresh air to clear alot of these...I wonder just how far this would go and if the public would lose total trust in the government.
86 posted on 10/22/2003 7:52:10 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr Zilman
Pray tell, point out where I'm wrong.

Were the jets that dropped napalm (curious ordnance to attack a ship with) flying very low and slow to ensure that they knew the identity of their target?

Were the topside fires on the Liberty completely smokeless?

87 posted on 10/22/2003 7:54:30 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Your comments lead me to ponder this question: If it could be demonstrated, incontrovertibly, that Israel knew it was an American ship and that the Israeli government and military knew they were killing US servicemen in the attack on the Liberty, would you be willing to condemn and repudiate Israel’s actions?

Moreover, given your knowledge of the working of the Israeli military and government, could you tell me if you know of any instance, where Israel has ever done something, anything, that is morally unjustifiable? I'm just trying to understand whom I'm listening to. Thanks.
88 posted on 10/22/2003 7:59:19 PM PDT by US admirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Luckily I have my tin foil hat ready for use.
89 posted on 10/22/2003 8:01:01 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: US admirer
Your comments lead me to ponder this question: If it could be demonstrated, incontrovertibly, that Israel knew it was an American ship and that the Israeli government and military knew they were killing US servicemen in the attack on the Liberty, would you be willing to condemn and repudiate Israel’s actions?

Yes.

Moreover, given your knowledge of the working of the Israeli military and government, could you tell me if you know of any instance, where Israel has ever done something, anything, that is morally unjustifiable? I'm just trying to understand whom I'm listening to. Thanks.

Of course. The fact the Israeli government refuses to defy the US and the world, and go out and kill the terrorist leader Arafat who has been responsible for hundreds of Israeli murders, is morally unjustifiable from the side of the Israeli government because of the millions of Israeli civilians who have to continue to live in fear of more terror coming from Arafat.

90 posted on 10/22/2003 8:03:58 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Your reply is appreciated.
91 posted on 10/22/2003 8:06:35 PM PDT by US admirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

Comment #92 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr Zilman
If Israel could stand on it's own, and didn't rely on the annual $6 billion in "aid" from the U.S. they could defy anybody and do exactly whatever they wanted.

Israel was not receiving any aid from the US during 1967. Aid started after 1973. The aid every year is around $3 billion. Mostly in the form of loans. What does this, if I may ask, have to do with this thread?

93 posted on 10/22/2003 8:10:03 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I served 10 years in the VP community. (P-3 patrol aircraft) I know what ships look like from the air and How they are identified. Also being a private pilot. I know how pilots fly. And being raised in the Wisconsin deer woods. I know about “ Buck Fever

First even at 8 miles/min. more than enough time to get a good look. But the identifying aircraft were not doing that speed. More like 150-200 Kt.

And what flag the ship flies is the last thing you look at when “rigging a ship”

FOI P-3s when on station fly at 200 ft. 200 Kts

You look at the ship construction and configuration. And then see if that matches the name and flag that should go to it.

So even if it hadn’t been identified by a flying boxcar earlier. And the first attacking aircraft didn’t get a good look before it started it’s run. The following flights have plenty of time to get a good look. Plus there going to be doing battle assessment. To see were weapons hit ( Good shooting you hit right by that big dish antenna)

One thing is for sure! The attack was no accident!
You know How you can tell a unmarked Police car from a mile away. When your driving down the road. Sort of the same thing. And you don’t have “Arab Fever” for 30, 20, 15 or even 10 Min.
94 posted on 10/22/2003 8:11:08 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
What do you think of this?
http://www.thelibertyincident.com/docs/Misidentification.pdf
95 posted on 10/22/2003 8:13:38 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr Zilman
Reread my reply. As I already said, Israel was receiving almost no aid in 1967. Aid, in the form of loans, began in 1973.

Here is the take on aid:

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/foreign_aid.html

Again, let me ask, tell me how this relates to whether or not Israel attacked the Liberty on purpose, as you say?

98 posted on 10/22/2003 8:19:06 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
First even at 8 miles/min. more than enough time to get a good look. But the identifying aircraft were not doing that speed. More like 150-200 Kt.

The Mystere drivers were going much faster than that.

And what flag the ship flies is the last thing you look at when “rigging a ship”

The US Navy maritime patrol community is better-trained at this thing than Israeli fast-movers are.

FOI P-3s when on station fly at 200 ft. 200 Kts

Mysteres scrambled on a panic call fly 500 knots and 1,000 feet.

You look at the ship construction and configuration. And then see if that matches the name and flag that should go to it.

Sure.

Do that in a single-seat fast-mover under wartime conditions. Do it reliably, while knowing that getting too low and slow next to a hostile ship is a great way to get shot down.

So even if it hadn’t been identified by a flying boxcar earlier.

And you're going to tell me that there's never been a breakdown in communications between a maritime patrol outfit, the Israeli Army, and a bunch of fast-movers?

And the first attacking aircraft didn’t get a good look before it started it’s run. The following flights have plenty of time to get a good look.

After the damn ship's on fire?

One thing is for sure! The attack was no accident!

OK. Please tell that to the crew of the USCGC Point Welcome (attacked by the USAF off Vietnam, 1966) and the crew of the USS Nautilus (attacked by US Army Air Force bombers during the Battle of Midway, 1942).

99 posted on 10/22/2003 8:20:15 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Dr Zilman
You are exactly right about the shamefulness of this. Congress was too cowardly to even investigate this attack on an American ship.

The only ones who believe this attack was an "accident" are idiots who believe whatever the government says or shills of Israel.

100 posted on 10/22/2003 8:20:21 PM PDT by Thorin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson