Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr Bush, here is why we opposed the Iraq war
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | 10/23/03 | many

Posted on 10/22/2003 4:15:15 PM PDT by Pokey78

Forty-one ALP federal parliamentarians have written an open letter to George Bush.

Dear President Bush,

The friendship between our countries is longstanding and deeply felt. We have a great deal in common, particularly our commitment to democracy. We retain our commitment to the ANZUS alliance.

That's why we feel it's important for you to understand why so many Australians opposed the war on Iraq.

Australians have a history of support for international efforts to stop the spread of weapons including weapons of mass destruction and landmines. Weapons inspectors should have been given the time they asked for to peacefully disarm Iraq. No evidence of a massive weapons building program nor capability has emerged since the war. Australia, the US and Britain went to war because of a "clear and present danger" which just did not exist.

The ALP firmly believes that international conflict should, wherever possible, be dealt with peacefully and through international co-operation under the auspices of the United Nations. When all attempts for a peaceful resolution have been exhausted, United Nations sanction is vital if force is to be used.

What is to prevent other countries from following the example of our attack on Iraq, and arguing the right to preventative self-defence? Why shouldn't North and South Korea attack each other using the template we developed in Iraq? Or India and Pakistan?

The precedent we have set is a very dangerous one, and there is every indication that the world will become less safe, not more, because of our actions. Certainly the British Joint Intelligence Committee believes the risk of terrorism will increase due to the war with Iraq.

Our own government knew of this increased risk before the war and refused to tell the Australian people.

Many Australians have continuing concerns about what will happen in Iraq now. Civil unrest continues. The death toll for Iraqis and US, UK and allied troops mounts. The bombing of the United Nations headquarters shocked the world, and it seems that instead of eradicating terrorism in Iraq the country has become a terrorist magnet.

The United States must now redouble its efforts to enlist the help of the world community to bring peace and rebuild Iraq, and then withdraw as soon as practicable. Iraqis must regain control of their destinies and their resources as soon as possible.

While many of us didn't support the war on Iraq, all Australians welcome the end of Saddam Hussein's brutal regime.

Our hope for Iraq is that there will be a strong, stable, democratic government which represents all the people of Iraq, including the ethnic and religious minorities.

Our hope is that the people of Iraq will have control over the rich resources of their country and be able to use those resources for their collective benefit. Our hope for the world is that this mistake will lead us to renew our commitment to the United Nations and its processes for promoting and maintaining global peace.

Signed by:

Dick Adams, Anthony Albanese, Anna Burke, Ann Corcoran, Laurie Ferguson, Jennie George, Steve Gibbons, Sharon Grierson, Alan Griffin, Jill Hall, Kelly Hoare, Julia Irwin, Harry Jenkins, Duncan Kerr, Mark Latham, Carmen Lawrence, Kirsten Livermore, Jann McFarlane, Leo McLeay, Bob McMullan, Daryl Melham, Michelle O'Byrne, Brendan O'Connor, Gavin O'Connor, Tanya Plibersek, Harry Quick, Lindsay Tanner, Maria Vamvakinou. Senators Nick Bolkus, George Campbell, Peter Cook, Trish Crossin, Kay Denman, John Faulkner, Linda Kirk, Kate Lundy, Jan McLucas, Gavin Marshall, Claire Moore, Ruth Webber, Penny Wong.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bigyawn; ignore; yawn

1 posted on 10/22/2003 4:15:15 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Kelly Hoare

That's sad.

At least her first name isn't 'Ima'.

2 posted on 10/22/2003 4:17:10 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Question for these earnest folks - do they really want it back the way it was? The rape rooms? The shredder executions? The live burials? Because that's exactly what they just asked for.
3 posted on 10/22/2003 4:18:55 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Too wordy. How about:

Dear President Bush,

Logic is a foreign concept to the undersigned.

Signed,
...

4 posted on 10/22/2003 4:19:43 PM PDT by Snake65 (Osama Bin Decomposing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
And here I thought they opposed it because they are a bunch of Quislings with short memories.
5 posted on 10/22/2003 4:20:22 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Question for the quislings.............

Would you give up your freedom to stop a war half a world away?

6 posted on 10/22/2003 4:25:56 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
" ... went to war because of a 'clear and present danger' which just did not exist. No, these doofuses dudes and dudettes choose to ignore the terrorist training camps Saddam operated for the many nationalities and al Qaeda operatives, ignore the Salman Pak jet hijacking facility, and choose to ignore the research and development programs already discovered to have been up and running ina the protected Saddam lair. If the delivery of bi-chem weapons by trained suicidal terrorists, trained in Iraq, isn't considered a clear and present danger, then their aren't any rice grains left in China. ... Oops, don't tell those dolts that one, they'll start a relief train for China! Pre-emptive deterrence and regime change are the only acts that can stop the rise of suicide terrorists being train in state's sponsoring terrorism. That's one big reason there cannot be a Palestinian State for the next fifty years!
7 posted on 10/22/2003 4:28:42 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The signers of this letter are either uninformed, agenda driven or complete morons.

What gives these people reason to believe that the next 12 years of sanctions/inspections would be different than the last 12 years of sanctions/inspections?

8 posted on 10/22/2003 4:36:12 PM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Weapons inspectors should have been given the time they asked for to peacefully disarm Iraq.

(continueing the thought for them) - Even if that means spending every last dollar you yanks have building up and drawing down your forces depending on how Saddam feels at any given moment. Just emagine all the world respest you would gain from letting a two-bit thug pull the greatest military power on earth around by its nose hairs for the rest of his life and the life of his sons and their sons and so on ...

9 posted on 10/22/2003 4:46:23 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
While many of us didn't support the war on Iraq, all Australians welcome the end of Saddam Hussein's brutal regime.

Of course, we all know that if we'd just asked him politely, Hussein would have stopped being so brutal and maybe would have even stepped down from power.

What idiots! How on earth did they think Saddam would be stopped?

10 posted on 10/22/2003 4:46:50 PM PDT by exDemMom (Happy to be on the side of light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
imagine not emagine
11 posted on 10/22/2003 4:47:50 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rudypoot
I'd say another hit in their back yard (Bali bombing incident that killed Ozzies) might convince these morons. If that doesn't do it, a hit on their famous bridge in Sydney Harbor or their famous (albeit, ugly)opera house should do the trick.
12 posted on 10/22/2003 5:30:35 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The ALP firmly believes that international conflict should, wherever possible, be dealt with peacefully and through international co-operation under the auspices of the United Nations. When all attempts for a peaceful resolution have been exhausted, United Nations sanction is vital if force is to be used.

1. The UN is a corrupt, impotent and dysfunctional dis-organization. 2. The UN had 11+ years and accomplished nothing in Iraq except to profit from the sanctions. 3. The United States of America does not defer our national security to the UN. 4. You are an appeaser and a contributer to instability.

13 posted on 10/22/2003 8:04:14 PM PDT by slimer ("The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slimer
"We have a great deal in common, particularly our commitment to democracy."

That's it? Like they do with France, Germany, Russia?

I consider this understatement an insult to the relationship. A carefully chosen weak phrase.

They would be speaking Japanese now if not for us.
14 posted on 10/22/2003 10:44:05 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals (Hillary's book tour was a thermometer in the behinds of the Dim sheeple for a 2004 run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson