To: LADY J
if he is no longer terri's guardian,would the hubby still get the insurance money,if she dies???????
To: fishbabe
He's still her heir, I think, unless a court changes that.
821 posted on
10/21/2003 9:14:10 PM PDT by
ChemistCat
(It's not over till she's better. He may still have killed her. Pray!)
To: fishbabe
if he is no longer terri's guardian,would the hubby still get the insurance money,if she dies??????? While most insurance companies don't like the publicity that can come from refusing to pay claims, I think that the insurance company could get very good publicity if it insisted on an investigation before making payment.
826 posted on
10/21/2003 9:15:21 PM PDT by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: fishbabe
"if he is no longer terri's guardian,would the hubby still get the insurance money,if she dies???????"
The policy was taken out before she got in this condition and has nothing to do with him being the guardian. It has a lot to do with him being the husband! Probably why he never wanted the divorce to marry his tramp.
I read about this on one of the many 'million' posts and wish I could link it for you. I'm sure there is a FReeper who has read about it too and they will do the honors.
833 posted on
10/21/2003 9:18:00 PM PDT by
LADY J
To: fishbabe
You have to have some sort of legal right [insurable interest] in order to take out an insurance policy on someone. I know that in divorce cases, all that gets divided up. I don't know about the murky ground that the Schiavos are in. It is possible the insurance company could determine that he no longer has an insurable interest, in which case they can cancel the policy but have to refund the premiums.
I am not sure what Florida law says, but those are some of the points to consider.
837 posted on
10/21/2003 9:19:13 PM PDT by
hoosierpearl
(One nation under God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson