To: fishbabe
He's still her heir, I think, unless a court changes that.
821 posted on
10/21/2003 9:14:10 PM PDT by
ChemistCat
(It's not over till she's better. He may still have killed her. Pray!)
To: ChemistCat
"He's still her heir, I think, unless a court changes that." But if it were to be determined that either her "death" were not an accident or that there was criminal intent or motive, as has been suggested regarding the trust fund, wouldn't that nullify any benefit he might stand to gain as beneficiary of her life insurance policy? And if that was the case, would there be a sedondary beneficiary, or would the money be forfeited altogether?
1,240 posted on
10/22/2003 10:18:54 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson