Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Box cutter case suspect charged, released
AP | 10/21/03

Posted on 10/20/2003 11:16:00 PM PDT by kattracks

BALTIMORE (AP) — A college student who allegedly hid box cutters and other banned items on four airliners to expose weaknesses in U.S. security was charged with a federal crime Monday, and a prosecutor said he committed a "very serious and foolish action."

The banned items were not discovered on two of the planes until a month after Nathaniel Heatwole, 20, had alerted authorities about his scheme via e-mail. He was charged Monday with taking a dangerous weapon aboard an aircraft, then released without bail for a preliminary hearing Nov. 10.

On Sept. 15, federal authorities received an e-mail from Heatwole saying he had "information regarding six security breaches" at the Raleigh-Durham and Baltimore-Washington airports between Feb. 7 and Sept. 14, according to an FBI affidavit.

Objects aboard Southwest Airlines planes that landed in New Orleans and Houston were not found until Thursday.

The discovery triggered stepped-up inspections of the entire U.S. commercial air fleet — roughly 7,000 planes. But after consulting with the FBI, the Transportation Security Administration rescinded the inspection order and no other suspicious bags were found.

According to authorities, Heatwole told federal agents he went through normal security procedures at airports in Baltimore and Raleigh-Durham. Once aboard, he said, he hid the banned items in compartments in the planes' rear lavatories.

Heatwole told authorities that he left packages on four of the six planes, according to U.S. Attorney Thomas DiBiagio. Other packages were found on April 13 and April 14 in planes in Raleigh-Durham, N.C., and Tampa, Fla., but it was unclear when they were planted.

The TSA, which received Heatwole's e-mail, did not send it to the FBI until last Friday. FBI agents then located Heatwole and interviewed him.

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, whose department includes TSA, said officials "will go back and look at our protocol" for handling such e-mails. He said that the agency gets a high volume of e-mails about possible threats and that officials decided that Heatwole "wasn't an imminent threat."

The e-mail provided details of where the plastic bags were hidden — right down to the exact dates and flight numbers — and even provided Heatwole's name and telephone number.

The charge against Heatwole, a junior at Guilford College in Greensboro, N.C., carries up to 10 years in prison.

Defense attorney Charles Leeper told U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey that it was Heatwole's "sincere desire to return to college and attend classes." Leeper and Heatwole's family would not comment after the hearing.

Gauvey set a number of conditions for Heatwole's release. Among other things, he must not enter any airport or board any airplane.

According to an FBI affidavit, Heatwole's signed e-mail "stated that he was aware his actions were against the law and that he was aware of the potential consequences for his actions, and that his actions were an `act of civil disobedience with the aim of improving public safety for the air-traveling public.'"

However, DiBiagio said Heatwole's conduct "was not a prank. This was not poor judgment. ... It was not a test. It was not a civil action. It was a very serious and foolish action."

Deputy TSA Administrator Stephen McHale said Monday's court action "makes clear that renegade acts to probe airport security for whatever reason will not be tolerated, pure and simple."

"Amateur testing of our systems do not show us in any way our flaws," McHale said. "We know where the vulnerabilities are and we are testing them. ... This does not help."

Guilford is a Quaker college with a history of pacifism and civil disobedience that dates to the Civil War. Heatwole is not a Quaker but shares many of the tenets of the faith, including a belief in pacifism, according to a February 2002 interview with The Guilfordian, the campus newspaper.

The student, a double-major in political science and physics, refused to register for the draft when he turned 18 as required by law, according to the interview. Instead, he returned a blank registration form to the Selective Service System with a letter explaining his opposition.

The FBI affidavit, obtained Monday by The Associated Press, said Heatwole breached security at Raleigh-Durham airport on Sept. 12 — the day after the two-year anniversary of the 2001 terrorist attacks. He did it again Sept. 14 at Baltimore-Washington International Airport.

His bags contained box cutters, modeling clay made to look like plastic explosives, matches and bleach hidden in sunscreen bottles, the affidavit said. Inside were notes with details about when and where the items were carried aboard. They were signed "3891925," which is the reverse of Heatwole's birthday: 5/29/1983.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, when 19 hijackers used box cutters to take over four airliners, box cutters and bleach are among the items that cannot be carried onto planes.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; nathanielheatwole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2003 11:16:01 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A college student who allegedly hid box cutters and other banned items on four airliners to expose weaknesses in U.S. security was charged with a federal crime Monday, and a prosecutor said he committed a "very serious and foolish action."

Yea, sooo serious that they forced a release upon him!

2 posted on 10/20/2003 11:19:15 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Now they can go back to doing cavity searches on Grandma.
3 posted on 10/20/2003 11:19:36 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove; EGPWS
This is the "suspect"... Looks real scary, huh? He'd last about two seconds in prison.


4 posted on 10/20/2003 11:22:13 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Hey! I was in high school band with that guy twenty years ago!
5 posted on 10/20/2003 11:23:26 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Amateur testing of our systems do not show us in any way our flaws," McHale said. "We know where the vulnerabilities are and we are testing them. ... This does not help."

Of course it doesn't help. The bureacrats want the public to think that it's now extremely difficult to smuggle weapons/bombs onto an airliner, thanks to their new police powers and federal airport SS. Heatwole has publicly exposed the lie--and for that, they will never forgive him.

6 posted on 10/20/2003 11:26:37 PM PDT by sourcery (Moderator bites can be very nasty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
prosecutor said he committed a "very serious and foolish action."

Yup - he embarassed the federales.

7 posted on 10/20/2003 11:28:28 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
This is the "suspect"... Looks real scary, huh? He'd last about two seconds in prison.

Perhaps HE should have given THAT scenario more thought before performing such a "selfish" and "stupid" act?

I would wager a guess that this act of stupidity on his part didn't come from his parents or friends...if he has any friends.

8 posted on 10/21/2003 12:02:06 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; sourcery
I believe this young man did something good for the U.S., out of a real concern for public safety. He did not have any evil or criminal intentions. He did not even try to hide his identity. But his methods were wrong. This is a sad case, really.

And ambrose is right. This young man would not last in prison.

In the law, there is a doctrine known as "Mens Rea." The idea is that some "criminal intention" must be found in an act for the act to be considered criminal conduct. The doctrine has a long history in the English common law. But now we have strict liability statutes and you may violate a statute even though you have no actual criminal intent. Federal law is all strict liability and if you step over the line you will reap a very hard penalty.

The prosecution of this young man is all about protecting and saving the airlines. 'Nuff said about that issue.

Hope the Feds decide to give him a break. Otherwise he will spend very hard time in prison.

9 posted on 10/21/2003 2:22:23 AM PDT by ex-Texan (My tag line is broken !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Yes, we pardon real criminals and put those in jail who are harmless. The Criminal Just-Us System. What a damn laugh.
10 posted on 10/21/2003 4:05:12 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
but if we actually have to find out the real cause of the problem instead of scapegoating someone who is pointing out the flaws, well then, the terrorists have won!


/sarcasm

11 posted on 10/21/2003 4:13:57 AM PDT by anka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Amateur testing of our systems do not show us in any way our flaws," McHale said.

Funny, it sure looks that way to me.

12 posted on 10/21/2003 4:20:40 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
In the law, there is a doctrine known as "Mens Rea."

Thanks for the explanation, but do you not, like, think we didn't see, like, "Legally Blond?" ;)

13 posted on 10/21/2003 4:22:22 AM PDT by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
......It was not a test. It was not a civil action. It was a very serious and foolish action." ................


It was a very serious test that is pointing out the foolishness of a US Attorney.
14 posted on 10/21/2003 4:31:25 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
If he had hidden a bag of finger nail clippers, he would really be in trouble.
15 posted on 10/21/2003 5:19:59 AM PDT by jwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert
This young man is unquestionably guilty a very serious crime. He has held our rulers up to public ridicule and displayed their incompetence. For this he will almost certainly be imprisoned for several years in an institution where he will be raped repeatedly. Serves him right.
16 posted on 10/21/2003 5:23:45 AM PDT by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
However, DiBiagio said Heatwole's conduct "was not a prank. This was not poor judgment. ... It was not a test. It was not a civil action. It was a very serious and foolish action." Deputy TSA Administrator Stephen McHale said Monday's court action "makes clear that renegade acts to probe airport security for whatever reason will not be tolerated, pure and simple." "Amateur testing of our systems do not show us in any way our flaws," McHale said. "We know where the vulnerabilities are and we are testing them. ... This does not help."

Unbelievable! What a--holes!

17 posted on 10/21/2003 5:27:15 AM PDT by suijuris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
and a prosecutor said he committed a "very serious and foolish action."

Yep he sure did. He showed TSA and the government as a flock of fools. Being pompous self-important fools, they are naturally very sensitive about this.

18 posted on 10/21/2003 5:31:06 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Amateur testing of our systems do not show us in any way our flaws," McHale said. "We know where the vulnerabilities are and we are testing them. ... This does not help."

A quick timeline -- kid puts items on plane on day 1, kid e-mails TSA on day 1 and tells them which flights were compromised, and in what way -- SWA employees find items on day 40 (more or less) -- TSA forwards e-mails to FBI on day 41.

Now, tell me about the bureaucratic vulnerability. The test isn't only that something got by the screener. The test is also how the TSA reacts to information. Bureaucratic behavior is predictable, inefficient, and defensive in nature.

19 posted on 10/21/2003 5:46:21 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
"Amateur testing of our systems do not show us in any way our flaws," McHale said.

Hmmm... if an amateur can do this, imagine what a pro could do.

Meanwhile, my fiance's 80 year-old Danish grandmother gets pulled aside for a secondary inspection. I feel so much safer.

20 posted on 10/21/2003 6:34:30 AM PDT by Modernman ("I'm just a simple man, trying to make my way in the universe."- Jango Fett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson