Statement by Jim Robinson Regarding the State of our Free Republic

October 20, 2003 | Jim Robinson

[nhoward14]

Thank you for your effort and vision. Continued blessings for you and your family.

[Quix]

But sometimes one wonders at some of the stuff put forward on occasion.

[Chad Fairbanks]

Yikes! That IS bad! Even Seattle isn't that bad, I don't think! Wow!

Of course, Seattle also has an office of Pravda, a statue of Lenin, and now a Seattle company supplies everything the ChiComs need to run their daily propaganda sheet...

[truthandjustice1]

"Ummmm... how can there be a 'history'? I mean, you're new around here, right? ;0)"

I can read the Bible like anyone else, right?

[winker]

Mr. Robinson I can only Amen! what you have written here. I know you to be fair in your assessments. I would appreciate when you are able that you would give us your opinion on Two critical issues facing this country. First: How do you read and comprehend the Patriot Act as it is currently presented and Second: Do you see The NWO linked in any way to George W. Bush's Administration or is it a carry over of Daddy's Administration that has never been properly addressed to the American People. In other words do you view these two items as a real threat to Freedom and Liberty? Winker!

[alrea]

Thank you for this wonderful site.

bump

[Chad Fairbanks]

Ahhh... OK, I though you meant that you and OWK had a history... and based on that, I figured, well, never mind. It was a naughty thought that I'll not repeat ;0)

[OWK]

Implying he was a retread was not a coercive attempt at forcing him to be quiet? So much for your Sola-No-Force-No-Fraud rule, eh?

You do understand that when we speak of "no initiated force"... we're talking about physical force, or the threat thereof...

No... of course you don't.

[Bob J]

Only from a federal standpoint. I believe States do and should have the right to establish laws regarding the disposition of their representatives terms.

[PhiKapMom]

Thank you much!

[Madame de Winter]

Jim,

Read your article, read it again, and read it a third time. ALso read over 250 posts. I see you are angry. Just to condense points I took away from your article:

-The Clintons are evil, because they want turn us into a socialist/totalitarian state and give us up to UN rule.

-The DemocRats are evil, because they want to close our churches, take away our guns, and kill unborn childre.

-The DemocRats must be destroyed, because the contol the press and judicial nominations,

-You have been bismerched on your intergrity, probably over all those this silly posts over what you're doing with all the money from that pledge drive.

-This socialism started with FDR...

Here are my responses, cogent and probably middle of the road. Our Constituiton does provide for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But what you ar advocating is a one party system, which as student of history make wonder, what is going to happen to other half of American(those who vote dem).

The pursuit of happiness is about disagreeing and the system of government is about compromise to level that is the least odius to all invovled. That's what's great about this country and all countries under their form of democracy.

Also what you do do with the money is your own busness...

[Viking2002]

Jim, you are not a nutcase, to be sure. Liberals in this country have evolved from emotionally-distraught pacifists and naive 'do-gooders' into a wholly evil, Godless, self-serving cabal of vapid totalitarians with designs on the minute-by-minute existence every last man, woman, and child alive on this planet.

They must be defeated at any cost. ANY, if the Republic is to survive.

[Bigun]

I haven't had a lot to say on FR of late but I think YOU know my position on these matters Jim!

GREAT POST! and thank you again for the finest site on the web!

[Sam Spade]

you've got mail...

[Quix]

And communism is also but ONE of the evils the enemy uses so skillfully.

[Bob J]

Thank God we have a majority on the SC to stop them. All these boneheads talking about how Bush is no different than Gore are crying crocodile tears. If Gore got to nominate 2 SC Justices with a Dem Senate behind him, we'd have another 40 years of wandering in the desert.

[truthandjustice1]

and the American Way

Indeed it is. Can you find room for an ex-Navy Viet Nam vet? And I don't mean Jim Rob. I chide, but I enjoy. Mr.Fairbanks is the same way. Were you Netanuprez?

[truthandjustice1]

"It was a naughty thought that I'll not repeat ;0)"

darn, you're clever!

[Bob J]

Yes, and we see how much good that is in getting our Justices seated.

We need a filibuster proof congress, then we'll see some real slowing...maybe even stopping and turning.

[AppyPappy]

Unfortunately, it appears Bush isn't having any luck with judges.