Skip to comments.
Microsoft launches 'leak-proof' e-mail
BBC News ^
| October 19, 2003
| BBC
Posted on 10/19/2003 11:42:20 AM PDT by Recourse
Microsoft launches 'leak-proof' e-mail
How the new Office software will look
The latest version of Microsoft's popular Office software will, the company claims, allow users to send e-mails that will "self-destruct" after a set time. The development is designed to improve security - and avoid potentially embarrassing messages coming back to haunt senders.
Microsoft says users will also be able to restrict who is allowed to read an e-mail - and prevent recipients from forwarding messages to other users or printing them off.
The new software - known as Information Rights Management - could potentially be used by governments and companies to prevent leaks of sensitive information.
Private e-mails
Several Wall Street analysts and bankers have been reprimanded or sacked in recent years for sending potentially incriminating electronic messages.
In the most high profile case, Merrill Lynch technology analyst Henry Blodget was forced to resign after investigators discovered he had been actively promoted stocks he privately rubbished in e-mails as "junk".
In the UK, government special adviser Jo Moore was sacked after she sent an e-mail describing 11 September 2001 as a good day to "bury" bad news.
More recently, private e-mails messages from members of the British Government and the BBC have been disclosed by the Hutton inquiry into the death of Dr David Kelly.
Regulators
Microsoft says Office 2003, which is to be launched on Tuesday, will allow users to "time stamp" e-mails, ordering them to be deleted on a set date.
But any organisation planning to install the new software may run into opposition from regulators.
In the United States, destroying e-mails is a federal offence, regarded in a similar light to shredding documents.
Earlier this year, brokers Morgan Stanley were fined $1.65m for failing to keep e-mail records.
The company says the deletions were an oversight, rather than a deliberate attempt to obstruct financial investigators.
Office 2003 also includes software intended to protect confidential information held in Microsoft Excel or Word programmes.
It is also designed to make it easier to read messages online, rather than printing them out, through a new viewing pane.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: computersecurity; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
1
posted on
10/19/2003 11:42:20 AM PDT
by
Recourse
To: Recourse
leak-proof With Windows 95 we had code name 'Chicago'. What's this one, code name 'Huggies'?
2
posted on
10/19/2003 11:46:32 AM PDT
by
TrappedInLiberalHell
(Hillary walks into a bar. Let's hope it leaves a nice bump on her forehead.)
To: Recourse
avoid potentially embarrassing messages coming back to haunt sendersYeah like that one from the Clintonistas about killin Vince Foster.........:o)
3
posted on
10/19/2003 11:50:53 AM PDT
by
Squantos
("Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex.")
To: Recourse
4
posted on
10/19/2003 11:51:15 AM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: Recourse
So Microsoft wants to make it easier for people to evade legal action. Gee, I wonder why that is? Could this be a feature developed out of internal need?
To: Recourse
Here we go with the MS bashing...
6
posted on
10/19/2003 11:58:50 AM PDT
by
ryanjb2
To: TrappedInLiberalHell
The latest version of Microsoft's popular Office software will, the company claims, allow users to send e-mails that will "self-destruct" after a set time.... ... just like their operating system.
7
posted on
10/19/2003 12:01:13 PM PDT
by
HAL9000
To: Recourse
Hmmmmmm.
The "Martha Stewart" insiders protection plug-in?
How creative!
8
posted on
10/19/2003 12:01:32 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: ryanjb2
Here we go with the MS bashing... Can you explain how criticising a feature of most value to criminals constitutes "microsoft bashing"?
Please?
9
posted on
10/19/2003 12:03:18 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: HAL9000
after a set time.... ... just like their operating system. Oh how I wish it was at a set time instead of random intervals.
10
posted on
10/19/2003 12:07:24 PM PDT
by
Flyer
(We now return you to my regular tag line)
To: Publius6961
Can you explain how criticising a feature of most value to criminals constitutes "microsoft bashing"? Sure - go out and bash the companies that already sell this feature as an after-market plug-in for all sorts of e-mail programs. We use an after-market plug-in that does this exact same thing in our line of work. And if you want, you can go out and buy it yourself. I can make messages available only for a limited period of time, I can make them unforwardable, I can set it so you can't copy or paste any part of the message. I can also set it so the e-mail is destroyed after it's read - all sorts of nifty stuff.
11
posted on
10/19/2003 12:09:52 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
To: Publius6961
In a related story Glock now plans to offer a 20$ handgun that features no serial numbers, a new barrel that prevents all rifling on a bullet, a new coating that prevents dusting for fingerprints, and can only fire armor piercing bullets. It's called the Ghetto Blasting Cop Killer 400.
Glock will be marketing it towards hunters.
/sarcasm
Hehe...
12
posted on
10/19/2003 12:15:05 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(No! Don't throw me in the briar patch!!!!!)
To: Tennessee_Bob
good golly, it's like you're living in a Mission Impossible episode :>
13
posted on
10/19/2003 12:15:45 PM PDT
by
proust
To: Bogey78O
I'd like a gun made out of chocolate.
14
posted on
10/19/2003 12:16:42 PM PDT
by
proust
To: proust
now, if only the phone would self-destruct after ten seconds, then I wouldn't have to take any more phone calls.
15
posted on
10/19/2003 12:16:46 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
To: Recourse
Once again, Microsoft makes absurd marketing claims. The following quote from the above article proves the point. Move your cursor over that text and you will see that it changes from a Text Select icon to an Image Select icon.
There is nothing in the software that will prevent screen captures. An underling, who wants to protect himself from possibly becoming a scapegoat in the future, can easily do a screen capture of an email that instructs him to do something questionable (just as I captured the above text from the article) and then print that image for archive or even for publication.
Just more of Microsoft's marketing lies... er... propaganda.
16
posted on
10/19/2003 12:23:55 PM PDT
by
Action-America
(Best President: Reagan * Worst President: Klinton * Worst GOP President: Dubya)
To: HAL9000
"self-destruct" after a set time.... ... just like their operating system."
BWAHAHAHGAHAHA!
BTW, I just found a virus on my computer...it's named "WINDOWS"....
FMCDH
17
posted on
10/19/2003 12:25:20 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
To: Tennessee_Bob
What about screen captures? Or having a VCR hooked up to the video card?
18
posted on
10/19/2003 12:35:39 PM PDT
by
JoJo Gunn
(Liberalism - Better Living through Histrionics ©)
To: Publius6961
"Can you explain how criticising a feature of most value to criminals constitutes "microsoft bashing"?"
Just because criminals can use it doesn't mean it doesn't have legitimate uses. Many attribute the worse motives to whatever Microsoft does. Well other software companies apparently have a similar product.
19
posted on
10/19/2003 12:36:20 PM PDT
by
ryanjb2
To: JoJo Gunn
What about screen captures? Or having a VCR hooked up to the video card? Sure, you can do a screen capture. You can also edit screen captures. I seem to remember a picture that made national news with Daschle pledging with the wrong hand - ring a bell?
As far as hooking up a VCR to a video card - that would be kind of difficult if the card isn't made to have a video card attached. Would also be kind of difficult to explain exactly why you have a VCR attached to your computer while you're at work - if you're not in a line of work that requires one. Myself, I'm not - I work at a pharmacy benefits manager - no need for a VCR or a capture card there.
20
posted on
10/19/2003 12:41:40 PM PDT
by
Tennessee_Bob
(LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson