Skip to comments.
"Pay No Attention to the Woman Behind the Curtain!!!!": Attending Terri Schiavo's Appeals Hearing
Not Dead Yet ^
| April, 2003
| Rus Cooper-Dowda
Posted on 10/16/2003 11:44:47 AM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: nickcarraway
Then the judge drew us all back into "Oz" by asking, "Does Terri have a brain?"
It's apparent that judge is in need of one.
21
posted on
10/16/2003 3:47:04 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: nickcarraway
He mentioned yet again that asking for a ham sandwich would prove Terri should live. Only the Cowardly Lion would be so afraid of reduced capacity and the inability to eat a sandwich by himself!
This guy's a complete effing moron or deliberately evil patch of scum. There are many, many thousands of people who live on total parenteral nutrition that is infused intravenously (not in a tube to the stomach as in Terri's case) and NEVER ask for a ham sandwich. For the most part, they don't have to worry about being classed as not worthy of living for not being able to eat a ham sandwich because they would be able to tell such a twit to P.U.A.R. and, if necessary, take up arms to defend their lives. The only people interested in doing this for Terri are precisely the people the "guardian" is trying to keep at arm's length. Gee, one wonders what could be motivating him so strongly to get her dead. Could it be the possibility of a more full recovery and regaining some ability to communicate in an unambiguous fashion?
22
posted on
10/16/2003 4:05:38 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: aruanan; All
Here's an interesting sentence:
The husband's attorney's final stance was that allowing Terri to continue to live "would be bad public policy." He held it would be an abuse of legal discretion to let Terri continue.
23
posted on
10/16/2003 5:48:12 PM PDT
by
oneday
To: oneday
Make that two interesting sentences. :-0
24
posted on
10/16/2003 5:50:24 PM PDT
by
oneday
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: All
26
posted on
10/16/2003 8:51:56 PM PDT
by
Sunshine55
(Save Terri Schindler-Schiavo)
To: oneday
The husband's attorney's final stance was that allowing Terri to continue to live "would be bad public policy." He held it would be an abuse of legal discretion to let Terri continue.
Yes, in other words, this person should die because to kill her would be good public policy even though she's not committed any capital offense, or even tried to do so, as someone else is suspected of having done.
27
posted on
10/16/2003 9:24:05 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: nickcarraway
Email Jeb with the the subject No Votes for Jeb 2008
jeb@jeb.com
28
posted on
10/16/2003 9:26:36 PM PDT
by
Diva Betsy Ross
((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
To: No More Gore Anymore
29
posted on
10/16/2003 9:28:37 PM PDT
by
Diva Betsy Ross
((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
To: TigersEye
BUMP
To: No More Gore Anymore
will do
To: nickcarraway
"The Judge asked the husband's attorney if the doctor promoting Terri's death was someone the court could trust. The answer was affirmative based on academic research and that the doctor in question had studied every person who has ever come out of a PVS state."
I knew for certain that is not true. I am one and I have never heard from him.
Bump for all those who think 'doctors' and 'judges' should have the right to decide that Terri's life is not worth living, and should be ended.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tsk_b/Act/17/31.html
EUTHANASIA AS BIG BUSINESS TO REPLACE MANUFACTURING, TECHNOLOGY [MY TITLE]
http://www.hospicepatients.org/hospwp.html
32
posted on
10/17/2003 7:24:45 AM PDT
by
Ethan_Allen
(Gen. 32:24-32 'man'=Jesus http://www.preteristarchive.com/Jesus_is_Israel/index.html)
To: joesnuffy
WHERE IS THAT VIDEO??? Why isn't it all over tv and the internet??
33
posted on
10/17/2003 7:25:36 AM PDT
by
bonfire
To: oneday; aruanan
"Here's an interesting sentence:
The husband's attorney's final stance was that allowing Terri to continue to live "would be bad public policy." He held it would be an abuse of legal discretion to let Terri continue."
___________________________________________________________
CORRECTION TO MY POST ABOVE:
I knew for certain that is not true. I am one and I have never heard from him.......THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN QUOTES. I HAVE NEVER BEEN PVS, AND I WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO WRITE LIKE THAT AUTHOR, EITHER!
34
posted on
10/17/2003 7:31:34 AM PDT
by
Ethan_Allen
(Gen. 32:24-32 'man'=Jesus http://www.preteristarchive.com/Jesus_is_Israel/index.html)
To: bonfire
Why isn't it all over tv and the internet?? Do you really need to ask?
35
posted on
10/17/2003 7:31:47 AM PDT
by
BSunday
To: nickcarraway
I don't normally like to comment on the eternal destiny of others, but I'm pretty sure Judge Greer is going to burn in hell.
36
posted on
10/17/2003 7:36:14 AM PDT
by
BSunday
To: nickcarraway
SO is Jeb Bush going to offer a stay of execution for this innocent woman or does he lack a HEART?
37
posted on
10/17/2003 7:36:39 AM PDT
by
nmh
To: BSunday
Um, yes. Why is that video not on Terri's site?
38
posted on
10/17/2003 7:38:18 AM PDT
by
bonfire
To: nickcarraway
And meanwhile we all wait the weeks it will take before we know if this time the court let her out of the ongoing tornado of need and depravation.
The last word should be either deprivation (in which case it would be redundant, following "need") or depravity, which, given the judges and attorneys who want her dead, is a more fitting description).
39
posted on
10/17/2003 7:41:14 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: bonfire; joesnuffy
Um, yes. Why is that video not on Terri's site? I was mistaken earlier in thinking you were referring to the big eyes video. As to why the sitting up in bed video is not on the web, ask their webmaster. That is, if such video does exist. In fact, post #7 doesn't mention a video of said event, only that the parents said that it happened.
40
posted on
10/17/2003 8:17:10 AM PDT
by
BSunday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson