To: aruanan; All
Here's an interesting sentence:
The husband's attorney's final stance was that allowing Terri to continue to live "would be bad public policy." He held it would be an abuse of legal discretion to let Terri continue.
23 posted on
10/16/2003 5:48:12 PM PDT by
oneday
To: oneday
Make that two interesting sentences. :-0
24 posted on
10/16/2003 5:50:24 PM PDT by
oneday
To: oneday
The husband's attorney's final stance was that allowing Terri to continue to live "would be bad public policy." He held it would be an abuse of legal discretion to let Terri continue.
Yes, in other words, this person should die because to kill her would be good public policy even though she's not committed any capital offense, or even tried to do so, as someone else is suspected of having done.
27 posted on
10/16/2003 9:24:05 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: oneday; aruanan
"Here's an interesting sentence:
The husband's attorney's final stance was that allowing Terri to continue to live "would be bad public policy." He held it would be an abuse of legal discretion to let Terri continue."
___________________________________________________________
CORRECTION TO MY POST ABOVE:
I knew for certain that is not true. I am one and I have never heard from him.......THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN QUOTES. I HAVE NEVER BEEN PVS, AND I WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO WRITE LIKE THAT AUTHOR, EITHER!
34 posted on
10/17/2003 7:31:34 AM PDT by
Ethan_Allen
(Gen. 32:24-32 'man'=Jesus http://www.preteristarchive.com/Jesus_is_Israel/index.html)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson