Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Never lie to me’: Bush to Daschle
The Hill ^ | 10/15/03 | Albert Eisele

Posted on 10/14/2003 6:27:34 PM PDT by Jean S

A new memoir by Minority Leader Tom Daschle says Senate Democrats were actively courting two Republicans — John McCain of Arizona and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island — as most likely to switch parties and give them control of the evenly divided Senate when Jim Jeffords of Vermont informed them he was ready to do so.

The heretofore untold sequence of events that led to Jeffords’ dramatic decision to bolt the Republican Party in May 2001 and become an Independent is disclosed for the first time in Daschle’s book, which covers the tumultuous two-year period following President Bush’s disputed election in November, 2000.

The book by the South Dakota Democrat, Like No Other Time: The 107th Congress and the Two Years That Changed America Forever, was written with co-author Michael D’Orso and is scheduled to be published next month.

The details of Jeffords’s decision, which ruptured his ties with the White House and many GOP colleagues and made Daschle majority leader, are among a number of insights Daschle provides into the inner workings of the Senate, his reaction to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and the bioterrorism attack that exposed 20 of his aides to deadly anthrax spores and caused the Hart Senate Office building to be closed for months.

Daschle also offers some harsh judgments of congressional Republicans and the Republican Party as well as veiled criticism of Vice President Al Gore and several Democratic Senate colleagues.

They include:

• His “complex and layered” relationship with the man he replaced as majority leader, Trent Lott (R-Miss.), who he said was so shocked by losing control of the Senate “that he could hardly finish a sentence” and could not accept the fact he had to share power in a 50-50 Senate.

• His admission that he initially underestimated George W. Bush and his grudging concession that he “is an undeniably effective communicator, not unlike Ronald Reagan” who “knows where he stands and is smart enough to understand what he needs to do in order to frame and express his stance on a particular subject.”

• His implicit criticism of Gore’s personality: “Al Gore’s breadth and depth of knowledge, his experience, his grasp of the issue were clearly superior [to Bush]. But people liked Bush.” However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election.

• His undisguised concern about “the rabidly fierce ideology” and “crusader-like zeal” of Bush’s top advisers, including Vice President Cheney, Karl Rove, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz, among others.

• His disappointment with “moderate” Democratic colleagues such as Zell Miller of Georgia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Max Baucus of Montana, John Breaux of Louisiana, Evan Bayh of Indiana and Tom Carper of Delaware for their willingness to go along with Bush and the Republicans on key issues.

• His low opinion of his former Senate colleague, John Ashcroft (R-Mo.), whose fitness to serve as attorney general he questions because he has “openly and defiantly used the power of his positions to advance his right-wing ideology.”

• His disdain for former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) who he said was bent on “demonizing” Democrats and portraying them as not only wrong or misguided but “evil,” and his scathing criticism of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), whom he accused of ruling “by fear, by discouraging any form of dissent among his membership, and by punishing those who dare to disagree.”

• His revelation that he intended to run for president himself in 2004 until he decided, after enduring “excruciating” inner turmoil, that he did not want to risk giving up his Senate seat and could not run for president and lead his caucus “in a new Senate that had an aggressive and extremely empowered Republican majority.”

Daschle also recounts his meeting with President-elect Bush in his Capitol office in January 2001.

“Until then, I never noticed his Texas swagger,” Daschle writes. “Perhaps it was the fact that in order to enter my suite in the Capitol, you actually need to pass through a set of swinging saloon-style doors. The combination of Bush’s confident strut, his self-assured manner, and those saloon doors swinging shut behind him all combined to create an image of a new sheriff in town. Which, in essence, he was.”

Nevertheless, Daschle confesses that he was troubled when Bush, after expressing the hope that they could work together as closely as Bush had with Bob Bullock, his Democratic lieutenant governor in Texas, said, “I hope you’ll never lie to me.”

“That statement caught me up short. What an unusual concern to express in such a meeting.… I’ve often wondered since then what George Bush might have been told about me that would make him begin this conversation, this relationship, from an implied position of mistrust.”

The catalyst for Jeffords’ decision in May 2001 was a meeting in late March between him and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Daschle writes.

The two men met in Dodd’s office on a Friday afternoon in late March “to discuss an amendment on child care. But they wound up talking about Jim’s friction with Bush and with the Republican leadership, Daschle writes. “At one point in the conversation, Jim wondered aloud if there was any room left for him in the Republican Party.”

“Chris could hardly stay in his seat,” Daschle recounts. “As soon as Jim left, Chris got on the phone and tracked me down in my office. ‘I think there’s something going on here,’ Chris said. ‘I think we really need to begin talking to him.”

Dodd’s phone call precipitated a carefully orchestrated behind-the-scenes effort by Daschle and other Democrats, including Vermont’s Patrick Leahy, to persuade Jeffords to defect. The effort was aided by White House snubs of Jeffords and by fellow Republicans, notably Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Pete Domenici of New Mexico, who undercut his authority as chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

Daschle believes that the key precipitating event occurred when Budget Committee Chairman Domenici informed him in early May that there was nothing for special education in the president’s education bill.

“That’s when I started making personal overtures, calling Jim, commiserating with him, and letting him know we were willing to talk whenever he was,” Daschle writes. “He came by my office a couple of times for brief chats … but we were very careful about that. I never came near him on the Senate floor itself or, for that matter, in any location where the press or Republican members might see us.”

Then, on the evening of Monday, May 14, Assistant Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada told Daschle that Jeffords wanted to meet with them in his hideaway office in the Capitol the next morning.

“It was 7 a.m. when Harry and I arrived at Jim’s hideaway that Tuesday morning, and Jim got right down to business. he had three primary concerns, and they could be summarized as: cows, committees and co-workers.”

Daschle agreed to oppose efforts to eliminate the government’s dairy policy and Reid volunteered to step aside so Jeffords could become chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, and to let him bring along all his staffers.

Daschle and Reid and their aides watched on television two days later as Jeffords announce his decision in Vermont, without knowing for certain what he would do.

“When Jim reached the point in his speech where he said, ‘I will make this change and will caucus with the Democrats for organization purposes …,’ the room exploded with cheers. You could hear us out in the halls.”


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: daschle; dasshole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
Then, on the evening of Monday, May 14, Assistant Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada told Daschle that Jeffords wanted to meet with them in his hideaway office in the Capitol the next morning..... “It was 7 a.m. when Harry and I arrived at Jim’s hideaway that Tuesday morning....

What is this "hideaway office" thing? I never heard about these before.
Does every Senator have a "hideaway office", and if so, what for??

22 posted on 10/14/2003 6:49:52 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
he says at least twice in this story how he underestimated what president Bush ment by his demand for honesty and clear communication. too bad, so sad. you are history. but only for a few weeks in ten years daschle is a trivia questions.
23 posted on 10/14/2003 6:54:37 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Maybe it's like a fort, or tree house kind of thing. You know, for the guys ... NO WOMEN ALLOWED!

Or it could be something else but I'd have to ask you your age before I tell you.

24 posted on 10/14/2003 6:56:44 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
• His low opinion of his former Senate colleague, John Ashcroft (R-Mo.), whose fitness to serve as attorney general he questions because he has “openly and defiantly used the power of his positions to advance his right-wing ideology.”

It is absolutely no surprise that a scumbag like Dascle would have a low opinion of a decent and honorable man like Ashcroft. Talk about polar extremes! And it could have been Ashcroft or any of about fifty other people who warned Bush that Daschle was a liar.

25 posted on 10/14/2003 6:57:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"His disdain for former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) who he said was bent on “demonizing” Democrats and portraying them as not only wrong or misguided but “evil,”..."

Newt didn't have to do anything, Little Tommy Dasshole and his Democrap "Hate the United States" Party do so by breathing!
26 posted on 10/14/2003 6:57:57 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumption
Harry Reid and Jim Jeffords?? Ewwwww....
27 posted on 10/14/2003 7:00:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Bump and thanks for posting this!
28 posted on 10/14/2003 7:04:03 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (Democrats recycle: bad ideas, bad policies, bad people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
I guess he means that Gore didn't order the Army to surround the White House. How big of him.
29 posted on 10/14/2003 7:07:01 PM PDT by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
Or the lawsuit against her to establish the liability for the deaths of those doctors because of her slipshod policies and pocketing money? I guess what frosts me is that Tommy is married to someone who presents a conflict of interest with his position as a Senator, as well as Dorgan in ND, who is married to a lobbyist who appears (or did in the past) in front of committees on which he sits!
30 posted on 10/14/2003 7:08:39 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (Democrats recycle: bad ideas, bad policies, bad people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
Or the lawsuit against her to establish the liability for the deaths of those doctors because of her slipshod policies and pocketing money? I guess what frosts me is that Tommy is married to someone who presents a conflict of interest with his position as a Senator, as well as Dorgan in ND, who is married to a lobbyist who appears (or did in the past) in front of committees on which he sits!
31 posted on 10/14/2003 7:08:39 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (Democrats recycle: bad ideas, bad policies, bad people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
Sorry about the double post, sometimes my happy finger gets away from me!
32 posted on 10/14/2003 7:09:10 PM PDT by alwaysconservative (Democrats recycle: bad ideas, bad policies, bad people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I am sure it will be as widely read as Jim Wright's book.

And marketed in the same manner !

33 posted on 10/14/2003 7:12:45 PM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
“That statement caught me up short. What an unusual concern to express in such a meeting.… I’ve often wondered since then what George Bush might have been told about me that would make him begin this conversation, this relationship, from an implied position of mistrust.”

He didn't have to be told anything. It was mere observation, Mr. Daschle.

34 posted on 10/14/2003 7:13:11 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
However, he credits Gore with acting in the nation’s best interests by not challenging the results of the 2000 election.


35 posted on 10/14/2003 7:13:55 PM PDT by Samwise (There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

36 posted on 10/14/2003 7:15:18 PM PDT by Michael121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: leprechaun9
"His disdain for former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) who he said was bent on “demonizing” Democrats and portraying them as not only wrong or misguided but “evil,”..."

Hilarious stuff ... the Left INVENTED this technique! Just precious!

37 posted on 10/14/2003 7:16:53 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
"Did I miss something? Didn't Gore challenge the results of the 2000 election"


...That ridiculous statement kinda jumps out at you doesn't it?
...Two people who had good reason to challenge an election but didn't: Richard Nixon-1960 and John Ashcroft in Missouri in 2000.
38 posted on 10/14/2003 7:18:54 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
Didn't Gore challenge the results of the 2000 election?

You gonna believe your own lyin' eyes or Daschle?

Daschle was so upset about Bush telling him not to lie. If you don't believe him, then he will really be deeply disappointed and saddened.

39 posted on 10/14/2003 7:18:58 PM PDT by BillF (Support Our Troops http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/997137/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Geez, this is total drivel. Which tells me Daschle must have actually wrote it since it's his psychotic style.

And he proves, yet again, that liberals like him to nothing but accuse others of the EXACT things they themselves do to everyone else.

What hypocrisy and total BS.

I hope the people of South Dakota wake up and put this guy where he belongs in 2004...an asylum.
40 posted on 10/14/2003 7:22:21 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Wake Up America, You're Dreaming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson