Posted on 10/14/2003 9:49:03 AM PDT by Coleus
Why I Believe in Divorce
By Janet L. Folger
"Why I believe in divorce" is not a column I would have anticipated writing-especially at the unveiling of National Marriage Protection Week. You see, divorce is at the root of many societal ills; just not this one.
The case is regarding Terri Schindler-Schiavo-a 39-year-old Florida woman who became disabled following an unexplained incident 13 years ago. Terri’s parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, have spent their retirement fighting for her life. But it’s worth it, they say, when they see her smiling face light-up every time they see her.
They love her, but don’t have any say in her care because she is still legally married to Michael Schiavo-Terri’s legal guardian.
The problem? Terri’s husband, Michael has been living with another woman he calls his "fiancée" for nearly ten years. He’s even fathered a child by her, and there’s another on the way. Can you say "conflict of interest?"
According to a sworn affidavit, Carla Sauer Iyer, R.N., who cared for Terri at the Palm Garden of Largo Convalescent Center from April 1995 to July 1996, Michael isn’t all too pleased that his wife is still alive. He was frequently overheard to say statements like: "Has she died yet?" and, "When is that b---- going to die?" Just the kind of guardian any father would want for his daughter.
Why doesn’t he just divorce her and move on?
Well, one theory is that not only is Michael her legal guardian, he is her rich legal guardian. He was awarded over a million dollars in a malpractice settlement-$750,000 of which was earmarked for Terri’s rehabilitative care. Except the money never went for Terri’s rehabilitative care; it is being spent on legal fees to remove all of her care-including her food and water.
Question: How do you get rid of your wife and still keep all of her money?
Surprisingly, it takes only three easy steps:
1. Hire an attorney that thinks starving a disabled woman is a good idea. Enter George Felos. At an appeals court hearing in August 2001, Felos set a high standard for personhood: "The litmus test," he said, "is whether or not a person can bring a spoon to their mouth." Nice guy-setting a standard for personhood that would empty out every nursing home, rehab and daycare center in the country.
2. Find a neurologist who thinks starving a disabled woman is a good idea. Enter Ron Cranford. He’s declared more people to be "vegetables" than you’ll find at the salad bar in a Bob’s Big Boy. A clever strategy when you want to throw people away as easily as you would scrape off your plate.
3. Find a judge who thinks starving a disabled woman is a good idea. Enter Judge George Greer of Florida’s 6th Circuit Court who has ordered Terri to be starved to death on Wednesday, October 15th at 2:00 p.m.-despite the plea from Terri’s parents and Governor Jeb Bush to try and feed her by mouth before starving her outright. But Judge Greer didn’t know if that would work. He doesn’t know, because he wouldn’t let them try it. By the way, Judge Greer is up for re-election. Not sure how you’d vote? Try skipping food and water for a week and see how you feel.
But wait, there’s more. According to Iyer’s sworn affidavit, "Any time Terri would be sick, …with a … fluid buildup in her lungs, colds, or pneumonia, Michael would be visibly excited, thrilled even, hoping that she would die. He would say something like,
‘Hallelujah! You've made my day!’ …‘I'm going to be rich!’ and would talk about all the things he would buy when Terri died, which included a new car, a new boat…among
other things."
Starvation and dehydration is so brutal, so agonizing, we wouldn’t do it to the most hardened criminal on death row. In fact, if you did it to a dog, you’d go to jail for cruelty. But for a disabled woman, that’s another matter. When Terri made her wedding vow, "till death do us part," I’m pretty sure this is not what she had in mind.
So let’s review our choices:
Starve a dog: go to jail-Do not pass "go;" Do not collect $200.
Starve a disabled woman-Collect $1.3 million, a new car, a new boat, and a new family.
But before Michael can take that new boat for a test run, lawyers on Terri’s behalf are filing for divorce. Pick a reason, any reason, adultery and starvation, are two that come to mind. Don’t get me wrong, I’m against divorce as a rule, but if given a choice between divorce or death by starvation and dehydration, I can tell you which curtain I’d pick. My closing argument before the court? Duh.
Folger is President of Faith2Action www.f2a.org
She is in such dire circumstances right now that it seems to me that divorce from a spouse who has sought and received permission to kill her is permissible. I don't know about remarriage after divorce, but her very life is on the line right now. It's so late now that I wonder why they didn't think of it sooner.
Perhaps a death penalty for adulterers might not be such a bad idea after all. It is interesting to me that a society that views adultery as legally non-punishable is also a society in which the innocent are condemned to death and the guilty go free.
Cordially,
Why has it taken 13 years to file for a divorce? When hubby refused to provide her with rehabilitative services, this should have been the next move! There must be more to this action than we are being told.
.
Terri Schiavo is clinically brain-dead, after a heart attack more than ten years ago. Doctors state she can and will never recover. Her husband has said that she did not want to be left on life support. The courts agree with him, and have repeatedly ordered that her wishes be carried out. Her feeding tube is scheduled to be removed at 2pm (Florida time) this coming Wednesday.The comments which follow are even more odious.In spite of all this, her maiden family, the Schindlers, have been attempting to keep Terri hooked up on life support. And Randall Terry, who founded "Operation Rescue", is organizing their protests.
I could make smart remarks about Randall Terry having gotten involved, but I'll leave that up to the readers' comments. I will instead say that I understand all too well the grief that drives the Schindlers to this. And because I understand, the Schindlers' actions disgust me that much more. I could never keep a brain-dead relative alive against his or her wishes just to ease my own grief. That would be the height of selfish arrogance. It's better to mourn with a clear conscience.
No, that's too reasonable for the Schindlers, or for Randall Terry. Instead, they're vilifying Terri's husband, Michael Schiavo, claiming he abused her and purposefully withheld treatment from her. I guess there's no better way to deal with grief than by slandering someone who's also busy grieving.
The Schindlers and Mr. Terry are also picketing the hospice taking care of Terri Schiavo, carrying signs. Allegedly, one of the signs says, "Is this hospice or Auschwitz?" Don't that beat all? Comparing their family's legal fight to the Holocaust? As if their actions weren't outrageous enough already.
Fortunately for the Schiavos, the Schindlers have used up almost all of their legal options. Even the U.S. Supreme Court has already refused to give them a hearing. Hopefully, Terri Schiavo will soon be granted the dignified death she wanted from the start.
Did you read the article?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.