To: NYC Republican
I think that the housekeeper for Rush Limbaugh may have meant her tale to do him ill, but in fact, she may have saved Rush Limbaugh's life. for which I thank her. I have seen more than one person addicted to pain killers, and it is not a criminal act, for it is an act to try to escape unbearable pain. I hope this all works out for the good.
2 posted on
10/13/2003 7:25:47 PM PDT by
tessalu
To: All
DANG FREEPERS KEPT ME FROM BECOMING THE WORLD'S GREEN KING!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/13/2003 7:27:25 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: NYC Republican
More Ruch stuff to read later.
4 posted on
10/13/2003 7:29:59 PM PDT by
dix
To: NYC Republican
It's so easy to throw stones......
5 posted on
10/13/2003 7:30:22 PM PDT by
GregB
To: NYC Republican
The only "Lexus-Nexus" reference Rush made to drugs (culled from all of his transcripts reposited there) was one in 1995, made BEFORE his back surgery, I believe.
I've always listened to Rush and I've never heard him "lecture" anyone on drugs. He goes off on the Medicare prescription drug issue ("Why should a person of average income end up paying for Bill Gates' drug prescriptions?") but I've never heard address the issue of illegal/prescription drug use one way or the other.
7 posted on
10/13/2003 7:31:38 PM PDT by
soozla
(Twoallbeefpattiesspecialsaucelettucecheesepicklesonionsonasesameseedbun!!)
To: NYC Republican
First, let me say I will concede that, generally speaking, people don't like to be "lectured to." No one tells other people how to live with greater zeal than a liberal tells other people how to live.
8 posted on
10/13/2003 7:32:35 PM PDT by
stevem
To: NYC Republican
Dang - this article is good. It states well the difference between those who seek, and those who deny, a higher moral authority.
Bump.
To: NYC Republican
Libs only "tolerate" those who share their views. Anyone else is deemed "intolerant". (Ironic!) Oh, and the unwritten rule is "never tolerate Christians."
12 posted on
10/13/2003 7:46:58 PM PDT by
I'm ALL Right!
(He is no fool who would give what he cannot keep to gain what he can never lose. - Jim Elliot)
To: NYC Republican
A well written article. It clearly points out the lefts indignation and intolerence towards conservatives. A growing trend from the liberal establishment. Forty years of this crap is enough.
14 posted on
10/13/2003 7:49:44 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: NYC Republican
bttt
16 posted on
10/13/2003 7:50:49 PM PDT by
Roberts
To: NYC Republican
It's not that libs don't believe in morality, it's only the way they define it that they differ. They are very intolerant of anyone who doesn't agree with each and every one of their screwball theories and positions on social and poltical matters. They hate old-fashioned morality and ethics and want to substitute their own new age crapola. Remember libs wrote the book on political correctness and are the first ones to start name-calling when they lack a legitimate argument...something they are unfamiliar with. The idea that libs are tolerant and do not judge people is absurd and risable on the face of it.
31 posted on
10/14/2003 5:25:21 AM PDT by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson