[tessalu]

I think that the housekeeper for Rush Limbaugh may have meant her tale to do him ill, but in fact, she may have saved Rush Limbaugh's life. for which I thank her. I have seen more than one person addicted to pain killers, and it is not a criminal act, for it is an act to try to escape unbearable pain. I hope this all works out for the good.

[Bob J]

SHe sold her story to the National Enquirer. There are no good intentions when one does that.

[davisfh]

"I think that the housekeeper for Rush Limbaugh may have meant her tale to do him ill, but in fact, she may have saved Rush Limbaugh's life. for which I thank her. I have seen more than one person addicted to pain killers, and it is not a criminal act, for it is an act to try to escape unbearable pain. I hope this all works out for the good."

I've had similar thoughts, tessalu. In fact, I think that Rush's housekeeper may have imperiled herself in that the authorities often go after the supplier and not the addict. If she was his supplier as it appears, she may be looking at jail time herself.

[Tabi Katz]

Exactly. Ever notice how the Tolerance Police have no tolerance for someone who is suffering and in pain?

[For_God_and_Country]

"I think that the housekeeper for Rush Limbaugh may have meant her tale to do him ill, but in fact, she may have saved Rush Limbaugh's life. for which I thank her. I have seen more than one person addicted to pain killers, and it is not a criminal act, for it is an act to try to escape unbearable pain. I hope this all works out for the good."

Tess,

Im sorry to disagree with you, (if the story is accurate) Rush did commit a criminal act. If he was given prescription medication by a Doctor and took it in overdoses, that is not a criminal act. Rush illegally purchased narcotics that he did not have a legal prescription for. This difference between Rush and a street junkie is that Rush has the fiscal resources, to be able to illegally purchase legal narcotics, instead of relying on a street corner dealer.