Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals love Limbaugh's pain
WorldNetDaily ^ | 10-13-03 | Barbara Simpson

Posted on 10/13/2003 1:42:22 AM PDT by ambrose

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35050

Monday, October 13, 2003


THE BABE IN THE BUNKER Barbara Simpson


Liberals love Limbaugh's pain


Posted: October 13, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Barbara Simpson


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Liberals lost one and won one last week, leaving them crying and laughing.

They lost California to Arnold Schwarzenegger - a landslide in the recall election. That's the loss and the reason for anger, tears and political concern.

On the other hand, conservative talk host Rush Limbaugh told his listeners, as he signed-off on Friday, that he's addicted to prescription pain drugs.

That's a win for liberals. You can hear the laughing and gloating across the country and it's heard with a vengeance on liberal talk shows. As if professional jealousy isn't enough to engender the mountains of hate, they just love tearing conservatives apart when they find out they're human.

The media are acting like kids on a sugar binge. While liberal (read that Democrat) media hate that Arnold won the recall election, they secretly love it because, in their heart of hearts, they're celebrity whores and love the Hollywood glitterati. Arnold Schwarzenegger is nothing if not that, even though he's now governor.

But the Limbaugh situation is entirely different. This is personal and human, but it's being treated with ruthless cruelty by liberals, who not only hate what Limbaugh stands for but hate his very success. They detest that one individual, simply by doing a good job of articulating the conservative point of view, has been able to touch millions across the country. It galls them even more that he's No. 1 in ratings and got rich in the process. Oooh.

They smelled blood two weeks ago when racial sensitivity hit the fan with his observation on ESPN, a job he had for the main purpose of making observations about sports. He stepped in a politically correct pile by saying something evident. To avoid more controversy, he resigned.

Almost at the moment that story hit the headlines, another broke in Florida: His former housekeeper alleged she had provided Rush with painkillers without prescriptions. Limbaugh said he'd say nothing until he knew more about what was transpiring. Newspapers said an official investigation was ongoing.

Rush was torn apart for saying nothing, yet under the circumstances, it was exactly the correct thing to do. He said nothing until Friday when he took about four minutes of his program to tell listeners that he's addicted to prescription painkillers. He told of unsuccessful back-surgery several years ago, which left him with chronic pain and, now, two herniated discs. This is big-time pain.

Rather than risk further surgery - which can leave the patient worse or even paralyzed - he chose to take medicine prescribed by his physician. Along the way, he became addicted and said that he twice entered medical facilities to break the habit - to no avail.

His decision now is to take a month off to enter a 30-day treatment program to try to break the habit. He asked for listener support and their prayers.

So what does he get from the liberal media? Attacks. There's no sympathy for his medical ordeals. He's equated with street junkies and his addiction compared to guy in the alley mainlining heroin.

Yes, chemically, street drugs and prescription drugs are similar and yes, the effect of opiates on the body may be the same, but liberals just miss the point. Lots of points. Deliberately.

They won't cut him any slack because he's spoken out against use of illegal drugs. Sorry guys, there is no comparison. The people using illegal drugs do it for the high ? becoming a junkie is a built-in risk.

But liberals take it further: They want him thrown in jail. And, ON TOP OF THAT, it serves him right because he was outspoken about illegal drug use!

People in pain use prescriptions drugs to enable them to live as normally as possible. There's no high involved, just relief. They want the pain gone and the doctor can help.

Of course, there's an addiction risk. For heaven's sake, you can become addicted to over-the-counter cough medicine! That isn't the issue. For pain relief, the trick is balancing that with the point of addiction. Sometimes it doesn't work. But to excoriate Rush because he slipped over that line is monumentally cruel.

But liberals choose to be cruel, even if they sacrifice their own humanity. The same people who have compassion for the dregs of humanity on the street and for animals and insects cannot find an ounce of compassion for Rush.

And we know why. He committed the greatest sin: He's a conservative.


Barbara Simpson, "The Babe in the Bunker" as she's known to her KSFO 560 radio talk-show audience in San Francisco, has a 20-year radio, television and newspaper career in the Bay Area and Los Angeles.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: barbarasimpson; liberals; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Political Junkie Too
I guess those liberals are hanging out with the Law and Order and Moral Rectitude Conservatives...
81 posted on 10/13/2003 12:08:07 PM PDT by UncleJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
Oh, I understand when he's being serious and when he isn't. I've listened closely for years. I've heard his "I've given up Bush and can now vote for Clinton show from 92". I've heard his post 96 debate shows where he's amazed that Gore managed to out debate Kemp (Unbelievable). I've heard his parodies like Hey Paula, Philander in Chief and so forth. I'm not the typical dimwit he gets on the air who says they know what he is all about and then can't answer his little quiz. Fact is, he often makes tongue in cheek comments beyond top and bottom rejoins. And yes I've been on his show as describing myself as a moderate and him telling me more than once that I am a true conservative and not a moderate(July, 02 2 o'clock hour, but forget exact date). I listened when you used to be able to tell but no one knew when he was in Fla and NYC because of sound quality. I heard him explain the Vanity Fare article, why listerners shouldn't be upset with the Playboy interview (exposes him to more people) his explanation of his not having voted for Reagan and much more. Again, I'm not a newby and I do understand the show.
82 posted on 10/13/2003 1:26:21 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Then surely you must have recognized Rush's "I can be trusted with your wives and daughters in a Motel 6" comments as him joshin' around.
83 posted on 10/13/2003 1:48:08 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: UncleJeff
When Couric's husband died from colon cancer, she did a series of reports on colon cancer and her own colonoscopy. So when a prominent person admits addiction to prescription pain medication because of severe back pain, did Couric do a series of reports on chronic back pain and how Americans cope? No, she ridiculed the person because he's a conservative Republican.

-PJ

84 posted on 10/13/2003 3:38:42 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Wait a minute, did I get sentenced to be Katy Couric's spokesman??

When did this happen?? Why wasn't I notified?? Who negotiated my obscenely large salary/benefit package??

Personally, I would have given Rush considerably more credit had his admission (and trip to rehab) been a bit more "voluntary". This is too much like a conversion to Christianity as the sword falls.

I can't speak for Couric until that first check gets here. I'll have a statement at that time...

85 posted on 10/13/2003 5:41:01 PM PDT by UncleJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
Nice try, but this doesn't get Rush off the hook. Just read the emails he wrote published in the tabloid: "Going out with a bang." Rush clearly enjoyed the fun effect that OxyContin gave him.

Were Rush's e-mails published in the National Enquirer?

86 posted on 10/13/2003 5:52:27 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I could be wrong but it seems that Rush's creativity has declined over the past few years. I can't put my finger on it exactly, but one indicator are fewer 'skits' that is one of his trademarks.
87 posted on 10/13/2003 5:56:36 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I wouldn't be surprised to find out the RATS are behind Rush's outing. I believe this is a well orchestrated maneuver to destroy him.

88 posted on 10/13/2003 6:47:23 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (The CA recall's biggest losers are the three musketeers: the RATS, the LAT, and the National Inquire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Did the Rats get him hooked, then spend years supplying him with his daily fix??

You can't be "outed" if you aren't doing anything wrong, and blaming someone else for your troubles, or those of your heroes, almost guarantees a recurrence of the problem.

89 posted on 10/14/2003 8:00:49 AM PDT by UncleJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
Were Rush's e-mails published in the National Enquirer?

Yes. And it sounds just like him.

90 posted on 10/14/2003 6:30:41 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson