Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Boyd's Ideas. Why Bush will win 2004
May 5,2003 | self

Posted on 05/04/2003 6:25:31 PM PDT by calebcar

I recently read and recommend Boyd: The Fighter Pilot who changed the Art of War. by Robert Coran. It is about John Boyd, the man probably most responsible in the change in American fighting from Viet Nam to Gulf II.

I won’t go into detail but he emphasizes four factors: initiative, flexibility, harmony and speed. This is opposed to what he calls “Hey diddle diddle, straight down the middle (an example being Normandy).” The essential goal is to get inside the opponents thinking so as to cause confusion and ambivalence. Think of a fighter pilot who knows what his adversary id going to do before he does it, The adversary sees this happen a couple of times and gets paralyzed.

I think Boyd’s thinking is ingrained in the Bush administration. Coran described Dick Cheney when he was Secretary of State in the Gulf Was meeting regularly with Boyd. He says he overrode Schwartzkoff (sp?) in creating military strategy based on Boyd’s ideas. Boyd also fought continuously for more nimble military hardware. He thought that lots of high tech stuff cost too much in weight, fuel, and other trade offs. He was therefore fighting Pentagon brass and politicians who viewed procurement as pork and fancy toys. His thinking mirrors Donald Rusted in his recent battles with General White and others.

Not only is the Bush administration conversant with these ideas and have a leader with the intelligence to use them but they also have what I think is an insurmountable advantage in implementing them. Maneuver warfare-with the need for immediate decision-making requires delegating responsibility downward. This requires tremendous trust. People need to work together for a long time, know their mission, believe in their mission and have the same agenda. For many reasons I think Bush is much better able to create a team with these characteristics than any adversary.

I still have nightmares of the Clinton years. But I honestly think the advantages listed above will be very decisive in 2004.

I think one of the reasons the American military has been so successful throughout its history are that the American form of government is condusive to the culture necessary to enact Boyd’s principals. A link which shows this is Citizen Soldier on the U.S.S. Clueless website by Steven Den Beste http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2002/08/CitizenSoldier.shtml


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; election; johnboyd

1 posted on 05/04/2003 6:25:31 PM PDT by calebcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Jachques Defarge
I too have nightmares of the Clinton years. Oh how I loathed the low gas prices, booming economy, and the time where we had no major "war" to worry about

All of which you can thank Reagan. You can thank Clinton for the economy we have right now.

3 posted on 05/05/2003 8:56:30 PM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Jachques Defarge
We did have a war to worry about.We didn't worry and we got hit here in 1993,we got hit in Africa twice,we had the Cole bombing and we didn't worry.
5 posted on 05/05/2003 9:27:24 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Jachques Defarge
I bet you are happy to see the problem being addressed.It will be a problem we must deal with for years.
7 posted on 05/05/2003 10:03:39 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
You must be on a roll. Comments removed before I can even get a chance to read them. No surprise to me though, you are obviously a bitter Clinton fan.
8 posted on 05/06/2003 4:21:37 AM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billva
Give me a break .I did not remove his comment..He was a troll! His removed comment about was" blame it on Reagan".My tongue in cheek reply was what you read.Go read my posts.Clinton Fan?? The lowest blow,the deepest cut!
9 posted on 05/06/2003 4:33:33 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Sorry, I posted wrong and you misunderstood. My post was really meant for Defarge. Seems his comments get removed as fast as they get posted, and I was intending the jab for him. Pushed the wrong button and replied to you. For which I apologize.
10 posted on 05/06/2003 8:09:01 PM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: billva
No problem!I had seen him on another thread and suspected he was trolling.You could not have posted to him..someone blew the whistle. (Usually they at least try to be subtle.)
11 posted on 05/06/2003 8:18:25 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: billva
Clinton couldn't control his own member, less the economy, Bush is making the world safe, more important than the economy - you can't have an economy if arab terrorists have blown you up - and anyway once we get things going again and oil coming in you'll see the economy go through the roof.
12 posted on 05/09/2003 5:09:19 AM PDT by UmBongo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson