Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP lawmaker says 'out-of-the-box strategy' could give Trump an 'advantage' in impeachment hearings
Yahoo News ^ | Dec 8, 2019 | Kadia Tubman

Posted on 12/08/2019 3:38:07 PM PST by entropy12

While Trump has continuously blasted the impeachment inquiry, calling it a “one-sided sham process” and blocking his highest-profile officials from testifying before a Democratic-dominated House, the president has also said he would "love" for his administration officials to testify in the Senate.

“It will be fair in the Senate,” he said ahead of the first House impeachment hearing.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Florida; Issues; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: impeachment; mattgaetz; worstexcerptever
Please Freep this Poll. It is at the bottom of the page.
1 posted on 12/08/2019 3:38:07 PM PST by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“It will be fair in the Senate,”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sorry to say, I don’t share his confidence.


2 posted on 12/08/2019 3:47:51 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Murkowski already said the House impeachment inquiry was not fair. So that leaves only Willard Romney & Susan Collins as possible defectors.

No way 18 other republican senators are going to defect to the rabid democRats, who are desperate to remove Trump before he wins again in 2020.


3 posted on 12/08/2019 3:57:28 PM PST by entropy12 (You are either for free enterprise or for government price fixing. Can't be for both as convenient.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Well don’t trust Murkowski.


4 posted on 12/08/2019 4:19:37 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Ok, add Murky to the democrat column. That still leaves 17 more defectors needed. I am betting against it.


5 posted on 12/08/2019 4:25:53 PM PST by entropy12 (You are either for free enterprise or for government price fixing. Can't be for both as convenient.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

No I don’t expect 17 either for that matter neither do the Rats. What they really, really want is 4 rino traitors. That will give them a bipartisan majority to convict. They will use it is a propaganda club to beat on Trump with throughout the twenty campaign. We have heard Mitt has been working in the background to get some turncoats to join him. Maybe true maybe not.


6 posted on 12/08/2019 4:47:55 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

In the end, I think there will be no Republican defections either in the House or Senate.

And, off the top of my head, the three Democrat Senators most likely to acquit are Manchin, Jones, and Sinema.


7 posted on 12/08/2019 4:54:14 PM PST by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdzcm,.dadfjl,dz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

How is 4 defectors enough to convict? Senate needs 67 to vote to convict and remove from office. It is mission impossible. It is not simple majority like in the House of Reps.


8 posted on 12/08/2019 5:04:49 PM PST by entropy12 (You are either for free enterprise or for government price fixing. Can't be for both as convenient.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

It’s 67 to REMOVE. If the rats managed to get 4 traitors they would have a bipartisan majority that voted to convict. It’s strictly a PR victory because they would be well short of enough votes to remove. As I said they would use it as a club throughout the 20 campaign. This assumes the Rats lose no one. Watch Manchin and Jones. If Jones’s internals show he has a chance of re-election the rats may lose him because he must know if votes to convict he’s dead. Manchin could also be a no but he just got re-elected so it’s hard to say with him.


9 posted on 12/08/2019 5:18:24 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Mitt’s working as hard & fast as he can to impeach trump before ol mitt’s name turns up in this Ukrainian corruption


10 posted on 12/08/2019 5:46:21 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Actually 67 is 2/3 of 100 Senators. The constitution says they need 2/3 of Senators “Present”. So 2/3 of any number of Senators present to vote to convict or remove. If there is a plan to have lot of Republican Senators not show up, we could be in serious danger.

Also the Senate could offer “secret voting”. If that is offered, I guarantee you, lot of RINO Senators would vote in secret. A simple majority of 51 would be all it would take if they chose vote in secret.


11 posted on 12/08/2019 7:23:22 PM PST by Engedi (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

Yes, theoretically anything is possible. But while I am always fearing the worst from republicans, this time I feel sanguine about no removal of the POTUS based on how flimsy the “evidence” is.

Even Sen Murkowski said the House impeachment inquiry was ridiculously unfair.


12 posted on 12/08/2019 7:55:31 PM PST by entropy12 (You are either for free enterprise or for government price fixing. Can't be for both as convenient.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Engedi
Try running the numbers.

Right now we have 53-to-47 lead.

All 100 present--> 67 to convict.

Let's say we get 4 turncoats. So 51 to convict, 49 against.

By definition, ALL of the Dems wanting to impeach will show up; so will the turncoats.

So how many "closet RINOs" would have to stay away, to get 2/3 with less than everyone voting?

51 will have to be 2/3 of the number present.

51/2 is 25.5 so there'd need to be (round down so you exceed the threshhold) 3x25.5 = 76.5, or 76 present.

So you'd have to have all four turncoats, plus 24 other GOP Senators sitting out and not voting.

Do you REALLY think 24 Republicans are going to sit out to allow the conviction of a President with a > 90% approval rating from their own party (seeing the size of his rallies) less than a year before the election, with the economy going gangbusters?

For impeachment charges which don't even name crimes ("Obstruction of Congress" literally was MADE UP; and you cannot charge someone with "Obstruction of Justice" for their ASKING TO GO TO A COURT FOR AN OPINION).

SOD OFF SWAMPY.

13 posted on 12/11/2019 9:54:54 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: phoneman08

I think there will be defections among the Democrats in The House


14 posted on 12/11/2019 10:03:04 AM PST by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Engedi

Any plan to have the “moderate”/anti-Trump Republicans fail to show up would be almost as politically damaging to those Republicans as if they just came out and voted against the man. I just don’t see it happening.


15 posted on 12/29/2019 11:19:56 AM PST by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson