Posted on 11/23/2018 2:24:50 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
As the Trump Dynasty stumbles into misrule and failure, how long before the first well-known journalist gets murdered?
With the president designating the news media as enemies of the people, unstable personalities like pipe-bomb mailer Cesar Sayoc and the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter have been shaken loose from their moorings.
Imitators surely will follow.
Not that theres anything new about it. Soreheads have been menacing journalists since the invention of newspapers. Recently, a man in Mountain Home, Arkansas, was charged with terroristic threatening after repeated phone calls targeting CNNs Don Lemon.
I wondered if he was the same idiot who used to call my home 20 years ago threatening rape and mayhem. At age 39, he appears too young. But more about that to come.
Two things are different about the current menacing climate: One is that left-wing cranks have gotten involved. Fox News host Tucker Carlsons wife was recently menaced by a crowd of anti-fascist protestors at their home. Activists affiliated with Smash Racism D.C. banged on the door, chanting, We know where you sleep at night!(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at chicago.suntimes.com ...
They have propagated hatred against many, but now cry foul as they are criticized in society. No one is advocating for violence against journalists. Many are, however, advocating for a redo of the media, with a focus on truth and neutrality. They have applauded the reform of so many things and professions in society, but now balk when it has become irrefutably clear that it is way past time for reform of their vehicle for stature and relevancy.
Establishment journalists, like judges (Im looking at Justice Roberts, but also at the SCOTUS injunction in Bush v. Gore against using the fact that SCOTUS found that the Supreme Court of Florida had been cooking the books for Gore as precedent for the proposition that sometimes courts are not objective), affect to believe their professional colleagues to be objective, no matter what. The First Amendment does not aim to create a journalism establishment; to the contrary it aims to keep members of the press independent. 1A explicitly, of course, makes journalists independent of government - but then, the authors of 1A had no example of the sort of non-governmental monopoly journalism which arose in the mid-Nineteenth Century.does not establish a ceiling over the rights of the people. Rather, as
- Amendment 1:
- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
makes plain, it is to be understood only as a floor under our rights.
- Amendment 9:
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Since the people had independent newspaper printers at the time of the ratification of 1A, and 1A intended to keep that situation, I argue that the people had (and we still have) a right to independent newspaper printers (and speakers) - and that a law against monopoly which was valid to break up Standard Oil is valid to break up a journalism monopoly. And that the First Amendment is not a defense against a suit under the Sherman AntiTrust Act against monopoly journalism.
What is the monopoly which transformed journalism in the second half of the Nineteenth Century? The Associated Press. Why? Because the AP wire is a virtual meeting of all major journalism in America. And because
People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations (1776)It is naive in the extreme to assume that, in over a century and a half, journalists have never found any incentive to practice on the credulity of the public. They have - and they do so precisely by posturing as objective when in fact they are knowingly negative. Anyone who thinks negativity is objectivity is a cynic.
“Donald Trumps base is itching for a fight”
Are we ever!
If “itching for a fight” means bringing justice to Hillary, Brennan, Comey, Mueller, Strzok, Page, and Rosenstein, then, sure.
These morons are just reflecting. They all want violence against conservatives but that would be bad, so therefore the conservatives must be trying to cause violence against them. It follows then that that they must protect themselves by attacking before the conservative attack them.
Nah.
Tunnel vision and memory loss affected the author’s take on things - can’t see Antifa or recall how it’s the Left , being abetted by the Media, that causes the most mayhem and has been doing so for as long as both existed with a big uptick from the ‘60s on....
The Donalds base is more than fed up with the congress and senate doing everything they can for a one world ideology.
How about America first?
And as for these a-hole judges, many need dragging behind an American made pick em up truck down a rocky road.
"How many Americans have to be murdered by illegals before effing 'journalists' give a damn?"
When extremist Jamal Khashogg was murdered we need to remember that - on average - fewer journalists working in the Untied States are murdered than journalists in other parts of the world.
Wow. So much for the peaceful left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.