Warren doesnt have Clintons ethical baggage?
She is a crook like Clinton, just not as big a crook.
Warren? No.
She won’t even be the 2020 nominee.
NO WAY! SHE VERY UNPOPULAR in her home state!
Tucker’s good at debating lefties, but that doesn’t mean his political instincts are worth anything.
I love the Tuck but he be wrong.
There is so much about her to make fun of. Trump would have had a field day.
Like Obama, Warren is an academic turned senator who has done nothing but run her mouth. But I guess that appeals to a certain type.
But if Tucker and Hugh ( who is not on my hit parade BTW ) might unconsciously be playing "Herb Adams" the 1980 Hockey Coach of the US Olympic team, as he told his guys, I don't about these Russians, I think they are beatable. etc etc. He was planting seeds to their success.
If they plant a seed that she thinks it's hers and she keeps yapping for the next 2 years and makes the DNC and her career even more of a mess, brilliant! smashing!
i very seriously doubt that Fakeahauntus could have beaten DJT. she’s a fraud down to her very identity (just like Obama was...and the LAST thing most Anericans want is another president who lies so much that s/he even lies about Themselves!)
but the commentator is correct insofar as the idea that someone OTHER than HilLIARy should have run for the D’s
Sounds like somebody just cucked the Tuck. Not good.
That’s about the dumbest thing Tucker has ever said.
I think Trump won in 2016 for the same reason that Obama won in 2008. Their respective opposition was so weak and/or so damaged that the winner became the lesser of two evils.
Hillary’s campaign was doomed when it was leaked that she and Was-a-man/Sgt. Schultz had conspired to rig the primaries against Bernie Sanders. While she kept most of her die-hard “we need a woman. any woman” supporters, those Democrats that were more of the Bernie mold (i.e. the far, far, FAR leftists) just sat on their hands in November. While it meant very little in the deep blue or blood red states, those lost votes in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were most likely the difference between a Trump and a Clinton victory in those places.
And as for McCain? Well, we could write a “War and Peace” length book on his problems in 2008 and beyond. Just leave it at “he sucked as a candidate” and Palin, like her or not, provided just too much cannon fodder for the in-the-tank press that year. Like they needed any more.
Obama wasn’t even an instructor. He was an adjunct lecturer - basically a fill-in substitute.
I was most worried about Biden/Warren. When they met in October 2015, I was sure they were working out a deal.
I wish I knew why it failed. Probably Fauxcahontas didn’t want to be #2.
Anyway, we dodged a bullet there. I do not share the low opinion of most people here about Biden’s political talents.
Every time I start to give Tucker a second/third/etc. chance, he shows his true colors again.
If you think that Tucker than you are just another talking head who really doesn’t yet understand what happened. Trump rode a wave that has never been seen in American politics before. He would have beaten any Democrat but FDR. Warren comes from the same smug arrogant cut as Clinton and would have had the same stupid advisers who would have sent her to the same states. Tucker guy, do you really think Warren would have appealed to blue collar MEN anymore than Hillary Clinton did? Please stick to doing interviews as political pronouncements seem to be a bit over your head.
And also, he never held a tenure-track position. He was an adjunct instructor-he may have been hired to teach a course or two for a couple of ten week quarters.
What a horrid thought.