HUFFPOLLSTER: Third Party And Undecided Voters Could Break For Donald Trump

The Huffington Post ^ | September 1, 2016 | Natalie Jackson and Ariel Edwards-Levy

[Gaffer]

Smart people call this “frantic, fitful night sweats.”

[Zathras]

HuffAndPuf now realizes the only way left is to get Gary into the debate.

[circlecity]

Important to keep in mind that there really are very, very few “undecided” voters. Studies have show that something like 90% of voters in Presidential elections who call themselves undecided end up voting for the same party they did in the last election.

[sparklite2]

Would Puffington Host put news of
President Trump back in the entertainment
section where his candidacy dwelt?

[scottinoc]

On immigration, by a wide 77-19 percent margin, voters support setting up a system for illegal immigrants currently working in the United States to become legal residents over deporting them

Yeah, no. Unless they polled only Wall Street fat cats.

[Savage Beast]

All they need is a good excuse.

[VanDeKoik]

And the plaster finally is starting to crack and fall away from the media narrative.

[TigerClaws]

That’s the only reason Bill won. Ross Perot.

I’m hearing Gary Johnson ads all the time now on conservative radio. Clintons likely funding it.

Trump should give a mill to Jill Stein. Those are Bernie voters.

[kabar]

Or not voting at all. Black turnout will not reach the levels of 2008 and 2012.

[jjotto]

I’m pretty sure both Johnson and Stein ran in 2012 too. Together they’re unlikely to get 2% this time either.

[Vince Ferrer]

Trump has become the Freddy Kruger of Hillary’s dreams. Every time Hillary falls asleep, he goes out and grabs more voters.

[TADSLOS]

Could = Has, Is and Will.

[Zarro]

We call them “clueless Obama voters”. Soon to be “brainless Hillary voters”.

[Vigilanteman]

Undecideds (including soft third party voters) always tend to break for the challenger, don’t they?

[Williams]

I do NOT believe 80% of Americans want to legalize illegals.

[uncbob]

Or not voting at all. Black turnout will not reach the levels of 2008 and 2012.

massive turnout wasn't really needed in those elections

Look for 110%-120% in big cities this time

[RayChuang88]

If they haven't done so already. After two awful public speeches by Hillary Clinton in the last eight days, everyone now noticing her not being very hale, and increasing calls to shut down the Clinton Foundation before it becomes an international mess, no wonder why Hillary's poll numbers are falling and could really nosedive soon.

And the Left will completely regret supporting her in the first place, when they should have "groomed" a much younger candidate with a lot less political baggage years ago.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Blatantly lying, the polls are the exact opposite, 70% want enforcement.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I heard a bunch during Rush’s show today.