Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does Obama Have on Comey?
Self

Posted on 07/06/2016 1:28:46 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Everyone who knows anything about the way organized crime and the Democrats knows that Obama wouldn't appoint Comey to his position in 2012 with leverage.

What does Obama have on James Comey?


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: rats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

GOOGLE “Comey + Whitewater”


41 posted on 07/06/2016 2:53:40 PM PDT by soozla (Truth prevails, regardless of who is willing to accept it ~ now or later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

I think when the FBI discovered that Obama was included on the SAP messages email chain along with possibly other high ranking administration officials that it was decided to bury the investigation.

Can you imagine the damage that this would have caused? (I know Freepers can) Bring down the president, and possibly future president, probably the SECDEF, and the directors of the CIA and NSA.


Agree. O will protect himself first, and he knows Hilly would out him if an indictment was brought.


42 posted on 07/06/2016 3:00:00 PM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

More good insight. I don’t think he really had a reasonable choice. Face it, he’s no George Washington. Neither are you or I.


43 posted on 07/06/2016 3:00:27 PM PDT by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride

Exactly....


44 posted on 07/06/2016 3:03:15 PM PDT by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Someone should post this little tidbit in it’s own thread from the FBI website. It is from the FAQ section:

>>Does the FBI work through U. S. Attorneys?

Yes. Although the FBI is responsible for investigating possible violations of federal law, the FBI does not give an opinion or decide if an individual will be prosecuted. The federal prosecutors employed by the Department of Justice or the U.S. Attorneys offices are responsible for making this decision and for conducting the prosecution of the case.<< https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs


45 posted on 07/06/2016 3:03:36 PM PDT by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Comey wasn’t going to take out the Democrat presidential candidate over a server. It wasn’t going to happen.

That isn’t the fix. The fix is making sure FBI investigates the holy heck out of the server while ignoring the several hundred millions in bribe money sitting in Clinton bank accounts.

During the Clinton years we learned, we had a PHD course, in using investigations to cover up a scandal. You can spend millions investigating something, you can have hundreds of agents out investigating, but you just set the parameters so that whatever they find doesn’t cross any boundaries you don’t want crossed.


46 posted on 07/06/2016 3:30:47 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Nothing


47 posted on 07/06/2016 3:35:15 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

He could have laid out the gory details like he did and not made recommendations. That is what’s weird to me.


48 posted on 07/06/2016 3:43:09 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Comey or bukaki, same thing.


49 posted on 07/06/2016 3:44:54 PM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Hillary rode Air Force One to North Carolina with Obama the same day for a campaign stop. The optics would have been horrible if she had been indicted. There is no way in hell this would have been planned if the knew for certain that she would not be indicted. The lack of indictment is a function of Obama. I just do not know how he did it.


50 posted on 07/06/2016 3:57:03 PM PDT by cpdiii (DECKHAND ROUGHNECK MUDMAN GEOLOGIST PILOT PHARMACIST LIBERTARIAN , CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: StAntKnee

Yeah that was Obama telling us that he thinks we are stupid. And if we are not, so what? There is no way we can prove he is lying.


51 posted on 07/06/2016 4:07:05 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: shotgun
No down side for us but if you’re Comey and you have this information he had to think about his life and those of his loved ones...

Sure there's threat from the political caste yelling You sold us out, now die! -- but if the issues are as big as I suspect then, as info comes out, he and quite possibly his family are going to be labeled as one of them and put on the "ok to kill list" by a non-trivial percentage of 300 million Citizens.

This isn't entirely due to the emails, but instead what they connect to. For example she had Special Access Program (SAP; somewhat like compartmentalized security, as I understand) info on her server, and that the email directly and explicitly ties into the Clinton Foundation and it's operations which include international money-laundering, selling influence/favor, and apparently [I have yet to find the original ref] human trafficking. (Remember these are all on an international scope, so it's possible that things like the treasonous "Iran deal" were bought through the Clinton Foundation.)

One FBI agent leaked the info that it's not the emails we should look at, but the Clinton Foundation, he also said that the corruption was huge and essentially implied it reached all the high-level politicians and bureaucracies (Link), predicting that there would be information revealed that would likely start a second Civil/Revolutionary War and/or give legitimate cause for other nations to declare war on the US.

52 posted on 07/06/2016 5:03:25 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

He needn’t have anything. They’re both fecking democrats.


53 posted on 07/06/2016 7:40:29 PM PDT by Rannug ("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson