Video quote”...He isn’t TrustTED... business failures...”
After Obama, I will NEVER vote for a president who does not meet the constitutional requirements to be president no matter how good his ads may be. Ted Cruz is a usurper, just like Obama, and he has no business in this race.
McCain the Maverick! Remember that?
Clever, but it seems more pro hillary than anti Trump, pro Ted
Alternate History is a literary genre. What if Ted Cruz had become president? Mildly interesting to speculate.
Pffftt. Please.
What part compares Cruz’s 22 people in the audience to Trump’s thousands?
cruise: GLOBALISTS unite!
Is Cruz trying to help Trump? Some of the things he attack Trump with in this piece actually make Trump look good. This is why all these negative attack ads don’t seem to work against Trump. Things considered negatives to INSIDERS are actually positive to outsiders
LOL, love the snarling, moustache-twirling Huma...very authentic portrayal.
Pathetic! Why would Hillary ask about stopping Ted Cruz when Cruz can’t beat Trump!
If it’s that good, he must have had it done in New York.
Besides which, there is absolutely NO possible way for Cruz to win 1237 delegates, nor stop Trump now; NONE!
And from what I've seen of and about Cruz, this primary season, he'd be one of THE worst EVER presidents of this nation, IF he was eligible to run for the office, which he is NOT!
Bookmark
Pretty weak effort. Many of the things said about Trump could be said for Cruz. I do like the Hillary and Huma characters though. Trump can use them in the future.
If you happen to agree with the title of the article, “Web Ad Is One Of The Best Things You’ll Ever See”, that would go a long way towards explaining why you are as delusional as the advertisement defeaTED Cruz, the illegal Canadian citizen candidate.
Trump is the only shot anybody has, any time soon, at a president who isn't owned by Wall St. fat-cats. The rest, both parties, are totally owned as Bill Bennett notes and, in my view, one more Wall St. owned presidency would finish this country.
In particular, somebody like Sanders or Martin O'Malloy would have to totally sell out to get anywhere close to the white house.
Trump has not come down on the wrong side of a meaningful issue so far to my knowledge. Issues he's on the right side of include the Russia/Putin issues and the greentard/Malthusian issues and all dems are on the wrong side of at least one of those.
He is the only shot you will ever have of seeing those 28 pages of that 9/11 report.
As Justin Raimondo at antiwar.com notes, DT's instinctive dislike for frivolous uses of the US military goes all the way back and is not just words which he has started mouthing for this particular campaign. Any of he other candidates, in my view, would be likely to get us into a major war.
The remaining big issue is that of money and banking and that should be an easy sale for people like Ellen Brown. Trump has spent 40 some years amassing a personal fortune while simultaneously watching bankers walk off with the lion's share of every deal that ever goes down other than cash on the barrel head; he could not possibly harbor any love for those bastards.
In fact the bankers have just now declared total war on the guy:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/donald-trump-wall-street-220141
Trump in fact strikes me as being so far towards what many are looking for that the establishment is likely to resort to extreme measures to prevent him from serving as president.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/bill-bennett-they-will-kill-trump-before-they-let-him-be-a-president.457721/
At this juncture, we're snaffed so badly that I'm not interested in a candidate who DOESN'T scare the idiots. This fear is behind the tidal wave of propaganda against trump, even as it is behind the propaganda against Vladimir Putin and Russia.
How does the party of Franklin Roosevelt come to a point at which all they can offer the American people is a choice between a witch and a bum??
The dem party has abandoned any thought of competing in any sort of a marketplace of ideas and tries to win via technique and gaming, including attempting to simply import voting blocks for themselves and, sooner or later, that sort of an approach to politics drives brains and talent out of the picture; there simply isn't any sort of natural selection for brains and talent within the party under those circumstances.
points out that Cruz can make the case for himself as the embodiment of what the American people say they’re looking for in a president. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And who now will suddenly believe Lyin’ Ted? He is like the former president Nixon, full of dirty tricks. He is a man who says one thing and does another, and has shown the kind of president he will be by his bad faith conduct during this nominee election cycle. It all started with Iowa when Ted lied to get Ben Carson’s delegates, by fraudulently stating that Carson was exciting the race.And it when on and on from there.
So now people are going to believe what Cruz says about himself as the embodiment of an American president?He is the embodiment of Nixon.
Cruz might possibly one day make a good head of the CIA, after he matures a little into some semblance of sophistication, where he can author his dirty tricks to use against foreign enemies instead of against Americans, but Cruz by his horrible conduct, has proven to everyone that he is not presidential material, just as Nixon was not.
Trump on the other hand has run a frugal campaign with great success, stretching his dollars ad infinitum, showing that he is a man who can use money properly and efficiently.That’s what our government needs, not a man like Cruz who dishonestly tries to spend his way into office through “advertising.”
VOTE FOR TRUMP ( Not for the Nixonian Cruz)