Don’t bet on it.
Once Hillary cinches the nomination, the riots from the Bern-Outs will begin.
I see overturned cars, looting and burning.
No one with a right mind is going to want to be part of that nonsense.
What this doesn’t point out is that Hillary’s negatives are almost as high as Trumps. I think Republicans who don’t like their candidate are much more likely to hold their nose, show up to the polls, and vote for the candidate.
It doesn't matter if Donald Trump beats Ted Cruz, or if Ted Cruz beats Donald Trump, or if the nomination is handed to someone else. Whoever it is will end up as the standard-bearer of the party of Judas.
When will conservatives tire of the betrayal?
The republican party is determined to lose by undermining those leading.
I have never heard so much vehemence on “conservative” radio towards the republican candidates.
Whatever popularity the Current Occupant may have is irrelevant. Herself, the presumed front-runner among the Democrats, is not particularly popular in her own right, and has nowhere near the popularity within her particular demographic (white females) that the Current Occupant had (and has) within his particular demographic (Americans of African descent).
And without the overwhelming popularity within the given demographics, there is a vanishing probability of electoral success.
Fraud, however, is always a backstop option.
Apparently the movers and shakers are counting on being able to move relatively undetected in their nefarious machinations.
It doesn’t matter if Donald Trump beats Ted Cruz: the Democrats are going to win
_______________________________________________
It doesn’t matter if Donald beats Ted - or Ted beats Donald - or none of the above.
The GOP-e will find a way to muck it all up and whoever is the nominee - will lose to the Democrats.
The headline is misleading, it uses the word win. Win implies competition. American DC establishment politics is criminally preordained thus there is no competition.
What, other than getting another byline, and thus trying to justify a salary, is the purpose of articles like this? Do we not vote because some pundit/journalist (from the UK no less) has said its already decided? Should we just avoid the cost of an election?
Very tired of it.
“A glance through the numbers since the end of the Second World War shows that in six open seat elections (ie without an incumbent) the three candidates who followed presidents with approval ratings below 50 per cent all lost.”
What that hell does that mean?
The mud fight among the 17 children of Republican candidates is probably the worst exhibit of non-Presidential stature ever seen in modern politics.
Makes me sick that we couldn’t find better candidates.
who are the D’s gonna win with?
Hillary the Liar (who has more baggage than American Airlines)
or
Bernie the Red?
(Actually, I think Bernie could win...at least he has lots of people enthused to vote for him, whereas Hillary has almost zero support in the D party membership)
Trump will crush Hillary, who can barely beat an old socialist.
Trump will win NY and upset all of the apple carts. He has run from the beginning as a New Yorker (his rough attitude, take no prisoners approach), works in New York, and NY loves celebrities.
Then it will be over.
Hillary is INCREDIBLY weak. I think either Trump or Cruz could beat her.
I have three nieces voting for Bernie, they voted for Obama, they will not vote for Hillary.
The left hated Reagan. They pulled every hate card against him. I’m sure he polled horribly. But yet he won.
More nonsense from the Euroweenies at the Telegraph. No, we don't need to pay any heed to their advice.
Of course they will!
HilLIARy has DOZENS of people showing up to see her, and they line up for MINUTES until they give up and leave when she is late.
“extraordinary proposal that women who have illegal abortions should be punished”
What’s extraordinary about it? If abortion is made illegal (after pigs grow wings), you have to do something to the perpetrators, or making it illegal is stupid.