Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump Says He May Ted Cruz to Disqualify Him: 'I Already Have a Lawyer'
People Magazine ^ | February 16, 2016 | Tierney McAfee

Posted on 02/16/2016 10:26:20 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

So go ahead, Trump. Make Ted’s day. Trump looks like a half wit, now. He might as well go all out and show the world he is a spoiled punk.


81 posted on 02/16/2016 11:19:42 AM PST by Jukeman (God help us for we are deeper in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

You gonna admonish Trump to stop?


82 posted on 02/16/2016 11:25:36 AM PST by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Give Trump a serious reprimand for his permanent record, k?


83 posted on 02/16/2016 11:26:20 AM PST by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman

“k?”

I believe your alphabet soup is missing some letters.


84 posted on 02/16/2016 11:28:08 AM PST by Politicalkiddo ("Death be not proud, one short sleep past, we wake eternally, and death shall be no more.."- J.Donne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“Not the attitude of someone 20 pts ahead.”

That’s not the point. There’s a principle involved.


85 posted on 02/16/2016 11:28:52 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Romans 8:38-39)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman
You gonna admonish Trump to stop?

No, Trump if free to issue all the empty threats he wants to.

86 posted on 02/16/2016 11:29:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“That’s why I really don’t care about Cruz’s status.”

Figures. A cheater supports a cheater.


87 posted on 02/16/2016 11:31:05 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Romans 8:38-39)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GunHoardingCapitalist

I’ve said the same thing on here many times and, up to this point, the standard response has been, “He [Trump] doesn’t have standing...” So which is it?

If Cruz is determined to be ineligible, so be it. But, although Trump has a brilliant legal mind, I’ll put my very fragile faith in the legal system ahead of my faith in “I’ll sue you” Trump.


88 posted on 02/16/2016 11:31:34 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

“That’s not the point. There’s a principle involved.”

Yeah, and Trump is “Mr. Principles” in the flesh. Give me a break. We all know that Trump is petty and cannot stand to be challenged. If Cruz weren’t a threat, Trump wouldn’t be fanning out his underwhelming plumage in order to try and scare Cruz away.


89 posted on 02/16/2016 11:34:18 AM PST by Politicalkiddo ("Death be not proud, one short sleep past, we wake eternally, and death shall be no more.."- J.Donne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

None of us wants the issue of eligibility or citizenship. Right now, the Dems are standing back and letting us duke it out regarding Cruz’ and Rubio’s eligibility. But we shouldn’t think for one minute that if one of them were to get the nomination, the Dems wouldn’t be on him like stink on a turd to take him and the RNC to court. We’d be tied up in court drama for months. I’ve heard they have the papers drawn up already just to pull out if needed.

If that happens, our side will not win! The lower courts are stacked with liberals. Then it would go as high as SCOTUS, like Bush v. Gore did. SCOTUS is not a complete body now so that would force us to let Obama push through his choice just so there would be a 9-judge panel.

God help us if Cruz or Rubio should prevail. It’ll be a hot mess in America for months and months.


90 posted on 02/16/2016 11:35:30 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Romans 8:38-39)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Trump has a lawyer.... sheesh... I wonder if that will scare CRUZ??? Trump is all show. It’s a carnival... step right up and see the guy with the crazy hair... he has a lawyer too!

Of course, Trump has a lawyer. Hell, he has several all of whom are charging him thousands of dollars per hour to chase after his latest whim. As long as Trump pays the bills, he could find an attorney who would take the law of gravity to court.

91 posted on 02/16/2016 11:35:55 AM PST by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee
And from what has been read at an earlier date - both parents were able to vote in Canadian elections.

Your reading comprehension needs work. The document that was posted showed a list of POTENTIAL voters - basically just a list of the residents of a certain area who MAY have been eligible to vote. It was the responsibility of the people who got the list to canvass the area and determine if the people on the list were a) eligible to vote and b) if so, registered to vote. Oh and by the way, that list was from 4 years AFTER Ted was born. So even if they had been eligible to vote in Canada at that time, it has no impact on whether or not Ted is a US citizen from birth.

Mac-do your homework before attempting to write about something you seem to know very little.

Seems like you need to follow your own advice...

92 posted on 02/16/2016 11:36:47 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

There aren’t any. It’s interpretation and belief. I listen to Trump and come to the same conclusions Cruz does. A snake oil salesman puts out his pitch and you believe him or you don’t. With Trump, I don’t. Is that a lie? Nope, because it’s what I truly believe (along with Cruz and a bunch of other folks), right or wrong. Which is why I vote we go easy on each other. Each side (except for the paid trolls) is probably as sincere as it gets. There’s no value in us destroying each other. That only helps our common enemy.

Peace,

SR


93 posted on 02/16/2016 11:37:17 AM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

“When you got your opponent down, go for the kill.”

So, as president should Trump go for the kill against every other person who questions his judgment? Say, 200 million “others”?


94 posted on 02/16/2016 11:40:18 AM PST by DaxtonBrown (wrote Harry Reid.s only biography www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Johnny B.

95 posted on 02/16/2016 11:41:25 AM PST by reegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GrouchoTex
(3) If he talks a lot about it but does nothing, which is where we are now. This puts the seed of doubt in voters minds about Cruz, but doesn’t actually lead to a resolution, which would play out as points (1) and (2).

But doesn't stalling on this issue and threatening a lawsuit that never comes undermine his supposed decisive, can-do nature? Trump is supposed to be a man of action but on this issue all he does is talk.

96 posted on 02/16/2016 11:42:27 AM PST by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

He’s just pulling Ted’s chain. :-)


97 posted on 02/16/2016 11:48:22 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

I’m wondering if this lawyer is the same lawyer he had “look into it” and said it was all fine. No problem. Different day, different position. All because Cruz had the temerity to rise in the polls and give him a run for his money.


98 posted on 02/16/2016 11:53:41 AM PST by buckeye49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

Be careful what you wish for - if Trump sues Cruz for his constitutional ineligibility (i.e. Cruz is NOT a nbc), Cruz just might be disqualified from competing for the presidency!
Trump would be doing everyone a favor if he does -
1. Cruz will be declared eligible or not, freeing him to pursue his dream job, or not, freeing his supporters the fear/anxieties from Cruz’s own refusal to address this issue;
2. Trump would have done the jobs for the democRATS, who will have to disqualify Cruz if/when he is the nominee.
3. Trump would have done the jobs for the GOPe who want to remove Cruz, 1 of their ‘unloved’ contenders!
4. Trump would have done ‘We the People’ the greatest favor by clarifying what exactly a natural born citizen is, so we can wipe obama off the US history and eliminate all his policies and appointees..., and going forward, we can abide by the Constitution 100%, by allowing only the nbc to run for the presidency.
5. Trump would be the hero of all time for being the one and only influential person with ‘standing’, and the courage to address this issue once and for all, bringing an end to the huge fight on what nbc is.

However, bear in mind the court and Congress will NOT address this issue -
The Courts always hide behind ‘no jurisdiction’ or ‘no standing’ or ‘it is a political issue’ or delay forever till they can declare it ‘moot’....
Congress, well, will do its best to avoid this issue and pass it back to the courts....

Before the R nominee is named, the court will say the plaintiff has not sustained any ‘harm’ yet, so will not rule on the case,
After the nominee is named, the court will say it is too late, it is moot, you should have sued before he is nominated.....

Oops, I should not have revealed that Trump does not have much chance of winning in court on this issue, but I cannot lie.

If you yell that Trump should stop talking and just sue Cruz now, you are either smart enough to know Trump will not get the nbc term defined by the court despite all his efforts/time/money, OR deep down you wish Trump, your chosen candidate’s opponent, will do something to remove the uncertainties surrounding your candidate.


99 posted on 02/16/2016 11:55:09 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republic_Of_Maine

Cruz has a great case for being NBC. Jus sanguinis (right of blood) applies, even if jus soli is the dominant means. As for those who’ve studied the Constitution, what about these guys?

Section 101(a)(23) INA (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(23)) provides that the term “naturalization” means “the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.” Persons who acquire U.S. citizenship at birth by birth abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents who meet the applicable statutory transmission requirements are not considered citizens by naturalization.

That’s from the State Department”s Foreign Affairs Manual. They’re not binding legal authority, but they’re supposed to know, and they are no friend of Cruz.

So, here’s the question: if Cruz is not a citizen by naturalization, as the FAM quote suggests, what one other possibility remains?

Whereas your NBC definition comes from ... where? No citation? Your personal opinion? Are we still a nation of laws? Or are we becoming a nation of poorly supported personal opinions?

Peace,

SR


100 posted on 02/16/2016 12:01:38 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson