Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Donald Trump's vicious attack on George W. Bush was so brutally effective — and brilliant
The Week ^ | February 14, 2016 Th | James Poulos

Posted on 02/15/2016 9:57:09 AM PST by entropy12

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last
To: entropy12

I also supported taking out Saddam. In hindsight, it was a mistake for the reasons you cited.

“Islam is a religion of peace”

That’s what Bush really lied about.

It goes in the face of ALL historical evidence, not to mention their own book.


21 posted on 02/15/2016 10:07:39 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

What about Gulf War 1? Didn’t that begin all this nonsense? The UN was in the middle of monitoring following the war and there were no fly zones. Our politicos agreed there were WMDs in those years (ie..Clinton). GWB wanted the UN resolutions to mean something and hold Saddam to account. My bottom line question would be, what would have happened with total annihilation in GW 1? Secondly, what would be the case today if we had maintained a strong presence in Iraq the past 8 years?


22 posted on 02/15/2016 10:08:57 AM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Durbin

I am willing to bet half my social security check, that Trump will eviscerate Hillary on Iraq war vote, her failure of record as secretary of state, her husband’s dis-respect for women and her tolerating it, white water, quick profits in options trading, millions in donations from foreign countries to Clinton Foundation, etc etc.


23 posted on 02/15/2016 10:09:11 AM PST by entropy12 (Who is the ONLY candidate NOT controlled by Goldman Sachs & CFG & COC & Robert Mercer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

And Bush’s naivete in thinking Arabs could handle freedom.


24 posted on 02/15/2016 10:09:33 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

Gulf War I was stupid. Who cares about Kuwait, just another backwards Islamic country anyway.


25 posted on 02/15/2016 10:10:24 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: agrarianlady

Trump has made it clear he is against abortions performed by planned parenthood. PP also provides a ton of health services to poor women, so there are some good aspects in PP.


26 posted on 02/15/2016 10:11:03 AM PST by entropy12 (Who is the ONLY candidate NOT controlled by Goldman Sachs & CFG & COC & Robert Mercer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I supported the Iraq invasion, not because I gave a damn about about WMDs, but because I wanted fear put into the hearts of the Muslim world and Hussein was a POS anyway. However, my support began to die for a few reasons: 1) silly rules of engagement, 2) Bush calling Islam a “religion of peace”, 3) a complete lack of a plan for after we took out Hussein. Even just leaving would have been a plan, but Bush decided to lollygag in Irag for years building schools and playgrounds while our guys got shot and blown up. Oh, and let’s not forget 4) Bush simply REFUSED to defend the invasion, ever, allowing the Left to stack talking point upon talking point against Republicans until Obama or some other Marxist a-hole became inevitable.


27 posted on 02/15/2016 10:11:52 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You are 100% correct.

I did supported the war but I’m pissed off at the way George didn’t say crap about Obama when he started to draw troops out of Iraq.

I’m ticked off at how quiet he was when the country needed him to stand up against the commie/muzz humping bastard who sits in the white hut.

One of the reasons why I like Trump. What ever he says, he stands by it right or wrong and will defend himself.


28 posted on 02/15/2016 10:12:01 AM PST by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram; LS; stephenjohnbanker
Neither one of Bush/s two wars had anything to do with American interests....its what the neo-cons wanted.

The political buzz was Bush had met w/ the neos BEFORE the election..... and cut the deal to invade BEFORE the election....to get their votes.

The deal also included the neos catbird seat in the WH....in the Office of Special Ops setup by Bush especially for them.

29 posted on 02/15/2016 10:13:24 AM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

kudos to you. it’s hard to continue to use your head in the midst of so much unfounded emotion.

in my case, all i can plead is ignorance, inexperience and prideful stupidity—some of it willful. garbage in, garbage out.


30 posted on 02/15/2016 10:14:16 AM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

Gulf War I was another stupid adventure. We spent the money, to dislodge Saddam from Kuwait. The rich Kuwaiti sheikhs simply went to London, lived in luxury, and came back when we made it safe for them.

What did we gain? ZERO! ZILCH! NADA!

What difference does it make if we buy oil from Kuwaiti sheikhs or Saddam? Let the middle-east fight it out among themselves. They can not drink the oil. They MUST SELL IT.


31 posted on 02/15/2016 10:14:45 AM PST by entropy12 (Who is the ONLY candidate NOT controlled by Goldman Sachs & CFG & COC & Robert Mercer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
PP also provides a ton of health services to poor women,

That is a LIE.

32 posted on 02/15/2016 10:14:49 AM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

invading iraq didn’t destabilize the middle east. abandoning iraq destabilized the middle east.


33 posted on 02/15/2016 10:15:01 AM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
With 20-20 hindsight, it is abundantly clear, it has completely destabilized the middle-east. ISIS would be impossible under Saddam regime.

The invasion was not a mistake. The "nation building" was the mistake. Iraq would have been fine had we toppled Saddam and then left well enough alone. We didn't. We had to attempt to impose Christian ideas (such as equality) onto a Muslim Culture.

Paul Bremmer is the man responsible for screwing up Iraq. His decision to disband the Iraqi army was one of the biggest pieces of idiocy of which I have ever heard. It was only exceeded in stupidity by his decision to ban all Bathe party members from government employ.

But what really screwed up the middle east is electing an unqualified simple minded petulant fool, just because the the thought of having a "black" president gave Liberal Media Democrats Orgasms.

That was the real disaster for the middle east, and indeed for the larger world beyond it.

34 posted on 02/15/2016 10:15:04 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar; entropy12
One of the reasons why I like Trump. What ever he says, he stands by it right or wrong and will defend himself.

...And he does it like a boss! :)
35 posted on 02/15/2016 10:15:08 AM PST by hawaiianninja (Palm note to self: "Prepare for some serious 2016 house cleaning. Trump/Cruz or Cruz/Trump 2016!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
With 20-20 hindsight, it is abundantly clear, it has completely destabilized the middle-east”

Please don't repeat this Democrat talking point on this forum. The destabilization happened after a certain affirmative action President vowed to withdraw all troops during a very sensitive and a previously estimated generation of US support for the duly elected democratic regime .

And let us get rid of another talking point, the presence of WMD. Even the NY Times admitted their presence there by reaffirming the intelligence reports given to Bush Sr, Clinton and Bush Jr.AND embraced by almost every coalition partner and their own intelligence services

36 posted on 02/15/2016 10:15:43 AM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
We have a pragmatist in Trump, a man who boldly and brilliantly solves problems...." Think I can’t get Mexico to fund the wall?

Well I got the media to fund my campaign!

Checkmate.

37 posted on 02/15/2016 10:16:07 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

the weekly standard is a worthless RINO rag . . . unless it says something supportive of trump.


38 posted on 02/15/2016 10:16:10 AM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

So, what we learn is that we had to hit Muslims as hard as Saddam and Khaddafi were.


39 posted on 02/15/2016 10:16:15 AM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

And Kuwait is still an Islamist hellhole stuck in the seventh Century, we sent our boys to fight and die for that?


40 posted on 02/15/2016 10:16:18 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson