Posted on 07/01/2015 8:45:08 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
A leftover from Friday’s candidate forum in New Hampshire via Eliana Johnson. I had a sense of deja vu watching this clip, and not just because I’ve blogged roughly a thousand Rubio statements on immigration over the past two years. Didn’t he … give almost this exact answer to Bob Schieffer on “Face the Nation” back in April, up to and including his endorsement of a path to citizenship as the final step in a three-stage immigration reform process? Come to think of it, he did! I wrote about it at the time. In fact, as far as I know, Rubio has never once opposed citizenship for illegals since he joined the Gang of Eight in early 2013. Johnson claims in her post that “he’s said he regrets his support for the failed Gang of Eight bill” since then, but I’m not sure I’d describe his position that way. What he’s said is that he’s come to realize that a comprehensive bill is politically impossible in Congress right now and that only a security-first piecemeal solution has any hope of passing. He’s never said, as far as I know, that he “regrets” joining the Gang or that he feels Obama and Schumer were untrustworthy partners. The distinct impression he’s given is that if the politics in Congress changed and comprehensive reform was suddenly viable again, Rubio might be onboard for that — in theory. In practice, he’d vote no because that’s what’s required of him to stay on the right’s good side in the presidential sweepstakes. But he’s never formally disclaimed comprehensive immigration solutions as inherently flawed or not worth doing (again, as far as I know). It’s the politics that makes them non-starters, not the policy.
What makes this not so newsy, though, isn’t the fact that Rubio has given the answer before but rather that, realistically, he can’t oppose a path to citizenship at this point. Having already voted for one when he voted for the Gang of Eight bill, what possible reason could he give now to oppose it? “I no longer trust illegals to become responsible Americans”? If he said that, he’d be all but admitting that he got suckered by Obama and Schumer, not a quality GOP voters want in a would-be president. To some extent he’s like Romney defending RomneyCare — better to disagree with the base and come off as resolute in the rightness of your position than cave and admit you were a chump before. Beyond that, Rubio’s playing a long game. He’s lining up members of the GOP’s pro-amnesty donor class to fund his coming war with Jeb and he’s selling himself as a guy who, by dint of his ethnicity and his work on the Gang of Eight, can pull in Latino voters in a way that no other GOP nominee could. If he suddenly comes out against citizenship, he’d be crapping away those strengths just to try to earn a little extra cred from conservatives, most of whom like him fine anyway and might actually lose respect for him if he tried to pander too shamelessly. The most he’s willing to do to mollify righties, I think, is what he’s doing here, emphasizing that security must come first and insisting that illegals should have a long go-to-the-back-of-the-line path to residency (and eventually citizenship) rather than an accelerated “special” path as part of a mass amnesty. What other answer could he give that would do him more political good, knowing that donors and Latino swing voters will be irritated the more hawkish he gets?
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Doesn’t the Donald also despite all his bluster about it?
I don’t see what the issue is.
I too, support a path to citizenship for Illegal Aliens.
1.) Register with the authorities as an illegal alien.
2.) Leave the country.
3.) Get back at the end of the line to come back in.
4.) Allow US authorities to evaluate your application keeping in mind that you deliberately broke the law entering the country illegally.
So, I too support a path. Probably not the same one that Rubio supports, I would guess.
Why not? He needs the corporate donor money like most of the others do.
Why not? He needs the corporate donor money like most of the others do.
Why, yes, you’re an idiot, Marco.
They aren’t illegal immigrants. They are criminals.
However we decide to settle the residency status of people who crossed our border in violation of the law, who stayed here in violation of the law and who now hold jobs here in violation of the law, we must NEVER allow them to have the right to vote.
That sanction is to respond to their violation of the law and to pay back the politicians who view immigrants who openly violate the law merely as future voters.
There are already LEGAL paths to citizenship. Why should illegals get preferential treatment?
Well, does it go thru Mehhiccco City???
If not, Faahgeddabaaat it.
Trump supports a path to citizen for illegals. But he is “brave.”
No America's fault that Mexico sucks so bad.
I to support citizenship for illegals like POS Rino Rubio.
I support them being citizens at some country south of the USA border.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.