I never thought Romney was most likely to win. In my opinion Herman Cain would have been a tough opponent to Barack Obama. An adult versus a juvenile. A successful businessman versus a community organizer.
After Cain was swift boated with bimbo eruptions from Chicago (shhh Chicago mafia is alive and well) I thought Newt would be best in debates with Obama.
In 2016, any one of Cruz, Walker, Jindal, Rubio, or Paul will be all tough against Hillary in debates. Things are looking up.
You talk about this as though you’re talking about sports. ‘Winning’ seems to be your primary objective here.
What’s the point of ‘winning’, if your candidate is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal with an R velcroed to his sleeve? Do you really think such a person is going to govern much differently than any Democrat?
At least two of the names on your list (Rubio and Paul) should be crossed off, due to the fact that both have already joined the Dark Side in Washington. Electing either of them would be almost as bad as electing the Dem.
Well it is the Republicans turn, so
Rafael Cruz (R)
Piyush Jindal (R)
Marco Rubio (R)