Posted on 01/14/2015 11:18:47 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
On Jan. 4, New York Times' Frank Bruni kicked off the new presidential race with an analysis of a likely - some say inevitable - Bush / Clinton rematch (Jeb vs. Hillary). Predictably it covered little that those outside The Political Class likely even found compelled to read. What, after all, is there to say of such a matchup?
If (another) Bush runs against (another) Clinton, and no one can tell them apart, will anyone notice? How many beyond the politically passionate — that is: those whose votes are ensured no matter who each party fields — will care who wins?
These are the points Bruni fails to mention, and they are key. Recall the Bill Clinton / Bob Dole debates: two quasi-clones tried in vain to convince us that there was a significant difference between them....
(Excerpt) Read more at pennlive.com ...
How could Jeb POSSIBLY fight his Sister-in-Law??? BJ Clinton is the Bushie’s brother....therefore Hillary is their sister-in-law!! What kind of conservative would want a FAMILY FIGHT????? Certainly not I!!
Look at dem Bushes out there
They're movin
I'll bet there's a white woman of color behind everyone of them.
We are a one party country: The LibRino or Librino party. We have faux campaigns, faux debates and it doesn’t matter who wins we end up with the same thing.
Bush / Clinton 2016!
Clinton / Bush 2020!
Uniparty Rules!
Let’s start the Family Feud!!!!!
NO!! One of them would WIN!!
Clinton and Warren are both Alinsky extremists.
...and the horses they rode in in; or maybe not the horses, they can’t help it.
Don’t know about Jeb, but Hillary rode into Washington on an ass, not a horse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.