Posted on 08/26/2014 7:41:51 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
DAVID PLOUFFE: Well, she would -- if she runs, and she's got to make that decision, she'll be the strongest non-incumbent candidate we've ever seen in history of American politics, certainly in the modern primary system.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
My Gosh, these people are determined to drag and push HHH (credit to Tom Blumer) down our throat.
For those who think HHH unelectable, after Obama, even a dung pile with teleprompter is electable.
Of course, it’s easy to list all the many important things Daniel Plouffe has been right about in the past.
Guess he forgot about Ike and how he destroyed the Rats as a Non-Incumbent.
The Nazis love “history”. Especially when THEY can make it up. This is horse****.
Has this idiot actually seen her on the campaign trail? Does he remember the 2008 campaign? Does he think someone else claimed to be “dead broke”?
Bill just wants access to more interns.
I hope Hillary Benghazi Clinton runs, and I hope she gets the nomination.
Ike was a media darling hauled out to prevent Robert Taft, a real conservative, from getting the nomination.
Dear Plouffy,
Hillary? Uh, no. That would be Sarah Palin, and don’t
you forget it.
That was Obama, remember?
Sure Ms Inevitable would be. Just like President Hillary was in 2008.
==
The same DEMOCRAT faction(s) that interrupted her last trek to her coronation are also working behind the scenes even now to make sure she has similar derailment should she run again.
“...she’ll be the strongest non-incumbent candidate we’ve ever seen in history of American politics”
Does that history include 2008 when Hillary lost the nomination to a relatively unknown and astonishingly unqualified Senator from Illinois?
How I wish there was any chance of the Republicans running a good conservative candidate against her. Hillary is eminently beatable, but if she’s running against Jeb Bush “What difference, at this point, does it make?”
I guess some fop like Romney could lose to her, but I suspect a RINO would always find a way to lose.
She was in a much stronger position in 2008 and flubbed it. This time, I don’t see a viable option on their side (although I am still shocked that Obama was considered viable in 2008).
Our side will likely trip over themselves as they have been constantly doing the past decade and let her cruise to victory. Only if a strong candidate rises up and builds a movement in spite of the incompetency of the party apparatus.
He was not an incumbent.
Plouffe
(noun)
1. The sound made when one takes a healthy Obama in a Port-A-Jon
Ike, at least, had a resume with genuine accomplishments.
Hillary is to the left what Palin is to the right.
And both have an equal chance of winning.
It just hit me, she is to the democrats what Bob Dole was to the Republicans. “My turn” isn’t gonna cut it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
